Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,156
- 48,799
- 3,565
In previous cases the identity of the cops is made public along with their public and private recordDid you see the video? Is her family pressing charges? Are we filing charges against them? Then there is no accuser you have a right to face.Did your elevator stop on the wrong floor?Same reason they don’t give trump intelligence briefing like they do Obama, bush and carter. Can’t trust trump.I assume the primary reason his name has not been released is the likelihood that a fatwa would be issued by the Trump jihadis. Understandable.No, because you trumpeciles will kill him since you think that she did not commit a criminal act and was involved in a "lovefest" tour of our Capitol.Should the Pelosi Inquisition identify and question the man to shot and killed ashley babbit?The GOP ran and hid when they had a chance to be a part of this, on their terms.Why did republicans turn down an independent investigation by a commission outside of congress when all the requests of how the commission should be set up, made by republication leader mccarthy, were met?
Trump called McCarthy after the commission deal was made, to cancel it, not to do it???
WHY OH WHY?
What are Republicans so AFRAID of the public funding out? I just don't get it?
Part of the reason they did that was obviously to condemn anything that is found.
They're pretty transparent. And it does make you wonder what they expect to be found.
But I'm all for getting getting every bit of information that pertains to the day. If they choose to keep his name secret, I can see that.
What else do you do if a former potus can’t be trusted?
This topic is about an unidentified individual with a gun who shot an unarmed protester on 6-1.
The police said it was a good kill. Justified. How come you always agree with 5he cops when it’s a black but when it’s a trump insurrectionists, you suddenly don’t back the police. Interesting
Not so in the babbitt case