So just what does China manufacture?

[RKMBrown]

Why don't you explain and while you are at it, how does it relate to Republican Policies?

The bill written by the dumbocrats did nothing to bring jobs to America. It replaced a stupid tax break for outsourcing with an even dumber tax break for insourcing. Outsourcing and insourcing have nothing to do with offshoring and onshoring.

Out-sourcing is contracting outside your company to get work done for you company. For example, out-sourcing your Payroll and Accounting to a payroll, and accounting companies.

In-sourcing would be the opposite of that such as creating a payroll department in your company to replace the payroll company you were working for.

The bill YOU REFERRED to was voted down by the republicans because it was INSANELY STUPID AND DID NOTHING TO REDUCE OFFSHORING.

Off-shoring is the movement of jobs to foreign lands. This bill did nothing about that topic other than having a wrongly written title. Which is typical of the dumbocrats.

I missed the part about Republican Policies. Unless you agree with Republicans that we should subsidies moving jobs to China. Regardless of what they say, it's what the do that tells the entire story.

What makes you think offshoring is a republican thing? What makes you think moving jobs to china is a republican thing? Was it all the money china gives to the democrats to continue this process?

 

[Londoner]

plus the chinese are little more than slaves to the government

Bingo. American workers can't underbid slaves and still maintain the demand requirements of economic growth.

Also, the canard about regulations is no longer as relevant. The point of the Reagan Revolution was to put business inside government because (we were told) corporations know best what regulations are needed. [This was a cornerstone of Reaganomics and it prefigures the utter corruption of K Street, which has created a pay-to-play rats nest ]

You understand lobbying right? Corporations pay handsomely to influence the regulatory process. Research the regulatory capture that has happened in say Pharma. Companies like Eli Lilly have created the most profit and monopoly friendly regulations imaginable. But they also pump money into Conservative Messaging which hides this fact through the endless bullhorning of brutal regulations.

It's a big fucking scam, and it depends on the manipulation of voters who are stupid enough to believe that the corporations who pour trillions of dollars into the pockets of politicians are [wait for it] being persecuted by those same politicians. This garbage doesn't even rise to the level of Orwellian Double Think. It takes a genuine fucking moron to believe the tired Ayn Rand talking points about the Stalinist state confiscating the family business. Everyone knows that Reaganomics reversed the relationship, that is, business now owns the state.

 

[Two Thumbs]

plus the chinese are little more than slaves to the government

Bingo. American workers can't underbid slaves and still maintain the demand requirements of economic growth.

Also, the canard about regulations is no longer as relevant. The point of the Reagan Revolution was to put business inside government because (we were told) corporations know best what regulations are needed. [This was a cornerstone of Reaganomics and it prefigures the utter corruption of K Street, which has created a pay-to-play rats nest ]

You understand lobbying right? Corporations pay handsomely to influence the regulatory process. Research the regulatory capture that has happened in say Pharma. Companies like Eli Lilly have created the most profit and monopoly friendly regulations imaginable. But they also pump money into Conservative Messaging which hides this fact through the endless bullhorning of brutal regulations.

It's a big fucking scam, and it depends on the manipulation of voters who are stupid enough to believe that the corporations who pour trillions of dollars into the pockets of politicians are [wait for it] being persecuted by those same politicians. This garbage doesn't even rise to the level of Orwellian Double Think. It takes a genuine fucking moron to believe the tired Ayn Rand talking points about the Stalinist state confiscating the family business. Everyone knows that Reaganomics reversed the relationship, that is, business now owns the state.

yes its all Reagans fualt

The biggest and longest economic growth in history is his fault

clintons nafta had nothing to do with it, magically
vast regulations, driving profits down and killing off small competition, had nothing to do with it, magically

You really shouldn't get your "facts" from the dnc.

 

[Mr. H.]

Looks to me some retards don't understand the difference between off-shoring, out-sourcing, on-shoring, in-sourcing, ...

Why don't you explain and while you are at it, how does it relate to Republican Policies?

Hey, idiot... Democrats are after 100 year old tax provisions that encourage investment in the oil and gas industries. The same tax provisions utilized by other industries, yet oil and gas is singled out for the chopping block. Obama wants to suck over $40 billion from these industries simply because he doesn't like them. It's estimated that 1.5 million sector jobs are at stake along with 30% of domestic oil and gas production. You're such a buffoon.

 

[Londoner]

yes its all Reagans fualt

The biggest and longest economic growth in history is his fault

clintons nafta had nothing to do with it, magically
vast regulations, driving profits down and killing off small competition, had nothing to do with it, magically

You really shouldn't get your "facts" from the dnc.

Reagan's massive deficits and the fact that the US went from a creditor to debtor nation under his leadership put his boom in a different light. Reagan tripled the debt of Carter. This is partly why Bush 41 lost to Clinton, because the government began its long bondage to the Reagan debt, necessitating tax hikes.

Also, you actually should research the amount of debt families took on to keep pace during the Reagan years. Easy credit does wonders for an economy in the short term. As does cheap oil prices. Under Reagan oil went from $100 to $30.

But it's not all his fault. Under Ronnie government transitioned its assistance from the middle class disproportionately to the suppliers. Reagan argued that this would trickle down to middle class purchasing power. It didn't. Which is why middle class families borrowed like never before under Reagan. The continued to borrow under Clinton and Bush until they had nothing left but their homes.

And we all know what happened next.

 

[RKMBrown]

yes its all Reagans fualt

The biggest and longest economic growth in history is his fault

clintons nafta had nothing to do with it, magically
vast regulations, driving profits down and killing off small competition, had nothing to do with it, magically

You really shouldn't get your "facts" from the dnc.

Reagan's massive deficits and the fact that the US went from a creditor to debtor nation under his leadership put his boom in a different light. Reagan tripled the debt of Carter. This is partly why Bush 41 lost to Clinton, because the government began its long bondage to the Reagan debt, necessitating tax hikes.

Also, you actually should research the amount of debt families took on to keep pace during the Reagan years. Easy credit does wonders for an economy in the short term. As does cheap oil prices. Under Reagan oil went from $100 to $30.

But it's not all his fault. He assumed that of government transitioned its assistance from the middle class to the suppliers, that it would trickle down to middle class purchasing power. It didn't? Which is why middle class families borrowed like never before under Reagan. The continued to borrow under Clinton and Bush until they had nothing left but their homes.

And we all know what happened next.

Typical lib. Making up facts as they go along. Urinating every which way.