So let me get this straight, Secretary Clinton...

[Jarhead]

According to Secretary Clinton, she opted to have her own personal server for she did not want to have two devices.....one for personal and one for government business...

Soooo......

Her tech people were tech savvy enough to set up a personal server that is secure and usable for classified information BUT they are tech naïve to the point where they were not aware that a device can have a multitude of email addresses on it from a multitude of servers?

 

[Jarhead]

Furthermore, she claims to have about 60,000 emails during her tenure as Secretary of State...and she claims about half of them were personal...

So she had about 30,000 emails over 4 years.

Lets do the math.....

That is about 7500 emails a year

That is about 144 a week

That is about 21 emails a day.

Really?

Only 21 emails a day for government business? ANd that is the reason she had to set up a private server?

 

[jon_berzerk]

simply she is not believable

she also makes a big deal that the state department has

the other end of the emails she sent out so they are safe -indeed

however she neglects to talk about her emails to foriegn countries

private citizens and other state officials who also "opted" to have

a personal off radar email

 

[Jarhead]

Does she have so little respect for the intelligence of the American People that she believed she can claim she did it for convenience when, in fact, it would have been much more convenient, much less expensive and much more secure to have both her personal email address and her government email address on the same device?

Bear in mind....she assured us that her server was secure because she had the secret service monitor it regularly. Did they monitor this separate server for free?

 

[ScienceRocks]

If it is breaking the law, it is breaking the law. Time for it to be enforced.

 

[Jarhead]

If it is breaking the law, it is breaking the law. Time for it to be enforced.

It was not breaking the law. It was against the rule of the administration, but no law on the books about using a personal server.

 

[Katzndogz]

She must believe on some level that every email address needs its own device. Maybe she thinks that all those emails would make the device too heavy to lug around. Or she knows better and just expects everyone else to believe it.

 

[Katzndogz]

The law that Clinton broke was the same one Petraeus broke.

 

[Jarhead]

She must believe on some level that every email address needs its own device. Maybe she thinks that all those emails would make the device too heavy to lug around. Or she knows better and just expects everyone else to believe it.

She was not the one who set up the server. Her tech people did. They knew dam well it is a one minute process to set up a second email address from a second server on her hand held.

So yes, she knows better and simply expects her supporters to believe her.

And they will.

 

[depotoo]

She has that little respect. She doesn't realize how obvious her lying body language is.

Does she have so little respect for the intelligence of the American People that she believed she can claim she did it for convenience when, in fact, it would have been much more convenient, much less expensive and much more secure to have both her personal email address and her government email address on the same device?

Bear in mind....she assured us that her server was secure because she had the secret service monitor it regularly. Did they monitor this separate server for free?

 

[Jarhead]

The law that Clinton broke was the same one Petraeus broke.

That depends.....did the Obama administration have her sign the affidavit stating that she released all government related material, including emails, paper documents, pens, computers, etc.....or was she given a pass.....
Patraeus signed that document. The White House has not disclosed whether or not she was offered a pass on it.

 

[Seawytch]

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

 

[Jarhead]

She has that little respect. She doesn't realize how obvious her lying body language is.

Does she have so little respect for the intelligence of the American People that she believed she can claim she did it for convenience when, in fact, it would have been much more convenient, much less expensive and much more secure to have both her personal email address and her government email address on the same device?

Bear in mind....she assured us that her server was secure because she had the secret service monitor it regularly. Did they monitor this separate server for free?

Body language? Who needs to look at body language. Her words were transparent enough. "I did it for convenience because I did not want to carry 2 devices"......that is a lie. She did not need to carry 2 devices.

 

[Jarhead]

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

Easy out for the likes of you.

Why address the lie she told. It doesn't matter.

You are one of those folks that will believe something no matter how ridiculous it sounds....as long as it is said by Hillary.

 

[depotoo]

No, I think Seawytch knows the truth, just as some others do. They are just tasked with trying to cover for her and others.

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

Easy out for the likes of you.

Why address the lie she told. It doesn't matter.

You are one of those folks that will believe something no matter how ridiculous it sounds....as long as it is said by Hillary.

 

[bripat9643]

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

Powell is a Democrat stooge.

 

[Zander]

Bottom line - She intentionally used her personal e-mail so that she could control what the public (through FOIA requests) could see. That was her goal all along....

The "two devices" tale is not even a plausible ruse.......She's not nearly as good a liar as Bill.......

 

[Seawytch]

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

Easy out for the likes of you.

Why address the lie she told. It doesn't matter.

You are one of those folks that will believe something no matter how ridiculous it sounds....as long as it is said by Hillary.

I'm one that knows the Clinton "scandal" machine is just getting cranked up...by the cranks.

A GOP candidate for President is actually under indictment...but Hillary's email address is a "scandal"?

 

[Jarhead]

General Colin Powell summarized: there is no there there.

Easy out for the likes of you.

Why address the lie she told. It doesn't matter.

You are one of those folks that will believe something no matter how ridiculous it sounds....as long as it is said by Hillary.

I'm one that knows the Clinton "scandal" machine is just getting cranked up...by the cranks.

A GOP candidate for President is actually under indictment...but Hillary's email address is a "scandal"?

still ignoring the fact that she lied about her reason for her "private server"......

Not at all curious as to why she opted to lie.

Don't care that she lied.

She is Hillary.

We get it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

All you had to do was watch her eyes, eyes are a give away when someone lies, they dart and avoid contact. We have six children....I know this