So much for the promised free speech on Twitter

[Harpy Eagle]

Your aversion to this exposes your innate desire to allow foreign influence on our elections when you don't like something...

 

[FA_Q2]

^
You forgot the irony image. This is a good one:

Ohhh, sneak edit

 

[dblack]

I provided a link directly ...

mkay

 

[Tommy Tainant]

They need to pay their $20. That will sort it all out.

 

[struth]

mkay

haha your inability to accept reality is why you are referred to as a cult over at the demafasict party

 

[struth]

the point being you didn’t realize the 1st amendment didn’t apply to foreign govts and their trolls? wow

 

[FA_Q2]

the point being you didn’t realize the 1st amendment didn’t apply to foreign govts and their trolls? wow

Or a private company.

Oops...

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Damn, this thread failed fast.

Yep the whine fest flopped

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And where did you meet this alleged "very prominent member of the MAGA troop", Hmm?

Linky-loo-?

It's that famous guy we heard about for 6 years unnamed sources

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Or a private company.

Oops...

But when government and private companies work together what do we call it?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I was told by a very prominent member of the MAGA troop that any restrictions means it is not free speech.

Was he incorrect?

Yes - and lying.

The doctrine of free speech concerns only the relationship between government and those governed, not between or among private persons and private entities – such as social media.

How Twitter edits its content in no manner ‘violates’ or ‘restricts’ free speech.

The ‘free speech’ rhetoric from conservatives is nothing but a rightwing temper tantrum because social media won’t allow conservatives to propagate misinformation, lies, and hate speech.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yep the whine fest flopped

Nope, it worked to perfection.

When Twitter was banning people you all agreed with it was an attack on free speech, when they do it to people you do not agree with it is the best thing since slice bread.


My work here is done.

 

[progressive hunter]

What happened to anything allowed?

MAGA porn, hate for Trump: China-based accounts stoke division

Twitter has disrupted three China-based operations that were covertly trying to influence American politics in the months leading up the midterm elections by amplifying politically polarizing topics, according to a trove of data released by the social media giant to researchers and The...

www.yahoo.com

Twitter has disrupted three China-based operations that were covertly trying to influence American politics in the months leading up the midterm elections by amplifying politically polarizing topics, according to a trove of data released by the social media giant to researchers and The Washington Post.

The operations spanned nearly 2,000 user accounts, some of which purported to be located in the United States, and weighed in on a wide variety of hot-button issues, including election-rigging claims about the 2020 presidential election and criticism of members of the transgender community. Two of the three networks favored the U.S. right and one skewed left. At least some repeated pro-China narratives aimed at an American audience.

who said anything would be allowed???

 

[Nostra]

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What happened to anything allowed?

MAGA porn, hate for Trump: China-based accounts stoke division

Twitter has disrupted three China-based operations that were covertly trying to influence American politics in the months leading up the midterm elections by amplifying politically polarizing topics, according to a trove of data released by the social media giant to researchers and The...

www.yahoo.com

Twitter has disrupted three China-based operations that were covertly trying to influence American politics in the months leading up the midterm elections by amplifying politically polarizing topics, according to a trove of data released by the social media giant to researchers and The Washington Post.

The operations spanned nearly 2,000 user accounts, some of which purported to be located in the United States, and weighed in on a wide variety of hot-button issues, including election-rigging claims about the 2020 presidential election and criticism of members of the transgender community. Two of the three networks favored the U.S. right and one skewed left. At least some repeated pro-China narratives aimed at an American audience.

By the way....


Your squad is traveling this week to get beat by the train wreck in College Station. We actually found a serviceable QB, JUST IN TIME.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

But when government and private companies work together what do we call it?

Government action.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

By the way....


Your squad is traveling this week to get beat by the train wreck in College Station. We actually found a serviceable QB, JUST IN TIME.

We have a QB, just no defense.

Who would have thought this game would be between two cellar dwellers?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

We have a QB, just no defense.

Who would have thought this game would be between two cellar dwellers?

Right?

It's a gimp fight.

The good new for you is that your coach has a lot of upside. Jimbo is a stubborn, washed up mfer that will require $120 per barrel to buy out.

C'mon Joe. Keep fucking up the supply.

 

[badger2]

what's the bullshit? are you denying what our own intel community found?

Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat Update for the American Public

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ODNI News Release No. 29-20 August 7, 2020 Statement by NCSC Director William Evanina: Election Threat Upda...

www.dni.gov

Many foreign actors have a preference for who wins the election, which they express through a range of overt and private statements; covert influence efforts are rarer. We are primarily concerned about the ongoing and potential activity by China, Russia, and Iran.

• CHINA – We assess that China prefers that President Trump – whom Beijing sees as unpredictable – does not win reelection. China has been expanding its influence efforts ahead of November 2020 to shape the policy environment in the United States, pressure political figures it views as opposed to China’s interests, and deflect and counter criticism of China. Although China will continue to weigh the risks and benefits of aggressive action, its public rhetoric over the past few months has grown increasingly critical of the current Administration’s COVID-19 response, closure of China’s Houston Consulate, and actions on other issues. For example, it has harshly criticized the Administration’s statements and actions on Hong Kong, TikTok, the legal status of the South China Sea, and China’s efforts to dominate the 5G market. Beijing recognizes that all of these efforts might affect the presidential race.

And you conveniently leave out the more pathologically serious parts of the above article: '....continue to support DHS and FBI....'

There are other takes on this CIA-Dem-sponsored propaganda:

https://twitter.com/WashburneAlex

'....(yesterday): 'Docs show Facebook and Twitter closely collaborating with the Dept. of Homeland Security, FBI, to police "disinfo." Plans to expand censorship on topics like withdrawal from Afghanistan, origins of COVID, info that undermines trust in financial institutions....'

 

[martybegan]

Nope, it worked to perfection.

When Twitter was banning people you all agreed with it was an attack on free speech, when they do it to people you do not agree with it is the best thing since slice bread.


My work here is done.

Who on the left, comparable to someone banned on the right, has recently been banned by twitter?