So progressives want “sanctuary cities”, uh?

[danielpalos]

nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

10USC246

I certainly dont' take you seriously.

"The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. "

Guess if you are under 17, or over 45, you aren't a member of the Militia.

Guess if you don't belong to the National Guard, you aren't a member of the Militia.

Anything else you'd like shot down?

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People.

States have second dibs.

The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

One voice out of dozens, and few agreed with him.

Few remember him, except for that one statement.

and even in those days, Militia consisted of able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

No women, no disabled, no men over the age of 45.

Instead of regurgitating liberal talking points, why don't you do some research.

See what Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc said about the militia

whatever can you mean? that understanding of the composition of the militia under the common law for the common defense, was ratified at the Convention.

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

 

[danielpalos]

In post #164, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) attempts to cite the U.S. Constitution.

how fortunate the People are, our Founding Fathers put it in writing.

However, when challenged on the U.S. Constitution, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) suddenly ignores the U.S. Constitution altogether in the very next post (#165) and instead claims that a quote from George Mason is suddenly and magically the law of the land:

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People. States have second dibs. The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

Folks...you just can’t make this stuff up. At no point did anyone claim who had first “dibs” on a state militia. After being thoroughly schooled by WillHaftawaite, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) immediately resorts to a straw man.

Furthermore, George Mason’s off-the-cuff remark is not law. The U.S. Constitution is. You’ve been owned once again, PRT.

lol. it was Not, off the cuff; that was the understanding that was ratified at the Convention, regarding the composition of the militia.

Seems they knew the composition of the militia far better than you.

The People are the militia.

 

[Auld Phart]

In post #164, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) attempts to cite the U.S. Constitution.

how fortunate the People are, our Founding Fathers put it in writing.

However, when challenged on the U.S. Constitution, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) suddenly ignores the U.S. Constitution altogether in the very next post (#165) and instead claims that a quote from George Mason is suddenly and magically the law of the land:

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People. States have second dibs. The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

Folks...you just can’t make this stuff up. At no point did anyone claim who had first “dibs” on a state militia. After being thoroughly schooled by WillHaftawaite, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) immediately resorts to a straw man.

Furthermore, George Mason’s off-the-cuff remark is not law. The U.S. Constitution is. You’ve been owned once again, PRT.

lol. it was Not, off the cuff; that was the understanding that was ratified at the Convention, regarding the composition of the militia.

Seems they knew the composition of the militia far better than you.

The People are the militia.

The 'Militia' was only made up of PART of the people, as previously pointed out

 

[Auld Phart]

I certainly dont' take you seriously.

"The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. "

Guess if you are under 17, or over 45, you aren't a member of the Militia.

Guess if you don't belong to the National Guard, you aren't a member of the Militia.

Anything else you'd like shot down?

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People.

States have second dibs.

The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

One voice out of dozens, and few agreed with him.

Few remember him, except for that one statement.

and even in those days, Militia consisted of able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

No women, no disabled, no men over the age of 45.

Instead of regurgitating liberal talking points, why don't you do some research.

See what Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc said about the militia

whatever can you mean? that understanding of the composition of the militia under the common law for the common defense, was ratified at the Convention.

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

 

[danielpalos]

In post #164, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) attempts to cite the U.S. Constitution.

how fortunate the People are, our Founding Fathers put it in writing.

However, when challenged on the U.S. Constitution, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) suddenly ignores the U.S. Constitution altogether in the very next post (#165) and instead claims that a quote from George Mason is suddenly and magically the law of the land:

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People. States have second dibs. The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

Folks...you just can’t make this stuff up. At no point did anyone claim who had first “dibs” on a state militia. After being thoroughly schooled by WillHaftawaite, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) immediately resorts to a straw man.

Furthermore, George Mason’s off-the-cuff remark is not law. The U.S. Constitution is. You’ve been owned once again, PRT.

lol. it was Not, off the cuff; that was the understanding that was ratified at the Convention, regarding the composition of the militia.

Seems they knew the composition of the militia far better than you.

The People are the militia.

The 'Militia' was only made up of PART of the people, as previously pointed out

Well regulated militia is specified, not the unorganized militia.

 

[danielpalos]

The federal government has first dibs on the militia of the People.

States have second dibs.

The People are the Militia.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

One voice out of dozens, and few agreed with him.

Few remember him, except for that one statement.

and even in those days, Militia consisted of able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

No women, no disabled, no men over the age of 45.

Instead of regurgitating liberal talking points, why don't you do some research.

See what Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc said about the militia

whatever can you mean? that understanding of the composition of the militia under the common law for the common defense, was ratified at the Convention.

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

 

[Auld Phart]

In post #164, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) attempts to cite the U.S. Constitution.
However, when challenged on the U.S. Constitution, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) suddenly ignores the U.S. Constitution altogether in the very next post (#165) and instead claims that a quote from George Mason is suddenly and magically the law of the land:
Folks...you just can’t make this stuff up. At no point did anyone claim who had first “dibs” on a state militia. After being thoroughly schooled by WillHaftawaite, the PRT (Paid Russian Troll) immediately resorts to a straw man.

Furthermore, George Mason’s off-the-cuff remark is not law. The U.S. Constitution is. You’ve been owned once again, PRT.

lol. it was Not, off the cuff; that was the understanding that was ratified at the Convention, regarding the composition of the militia.

Seems they knew the composition of the militia far better than you.

The People are the militia.

The 'Militia' was only made up of PART of the people, as previously pointed out

Well regulated militia is specified, not the unorganized militia.

agreed

and the militia consisted of able bodied males between the ages of 16-45.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. it was Not, off the cuff; that was the understanding that was ratified at the Convention, regarding the composition of the militia.

Seems they knew the composition of the militia far better than you.

The People are the militia.

The 'Militia' was only made up of PART of the people, as previously pointed out

Well regulated militia is specified, not the unorganized militia.

agreed

and the militia consisted of able bodied males between the ages of 16-45.

the federal militia.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

New York merely codified the common law understanding, ratified at the convention.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788

 

[Auld Phart]

One voice out of dozens, and few agreed with him.

Few remember him, except for that one statement.

and even in those days, Militia consisted of able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

No women, no disabled, no men over the age of 45.

Instead of regurgitating liberal talking points, why don't you do some research.

See what Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc said about the militia

whatever can you mean? that understanding of the composition of the militia under the common law for the common defense, was ratified at the Convention.

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

 

[danielpalos]

whatever can you mean? that understanding of the composition of the militia under the common law for the common defense, was ratified at the Convention.

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

 

[Auld Phart]

You cant read.

the right to keep and bear arms was given to the people, because those that signed the Constitution KNEW that militias were made up of ONLY able bodied men between the ages of 16-45.

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

 

[Unkotare]

Deport the illegals and give the jobs to Americans.

Build our economy bigger and stronger.

Which jobs? Which Americans?

In AMERICA....ALL jobs should be an AMERICANS job?
Is that confusing for you?

Apparently logic is confusing for you.

Why do you always dodge like that? ....

What “dodge”?

???

 

[danielpalos]

That is the federal militia act, not the common law for the common defense.

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

 

[Auld Phart]

have a link for the 'common law for the common defense' you're talking about?

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

women had the right to vote?

Blacks had the right to vote?

you keep throwing shit against the wall, and I:

 

[danielpalos]

Calling the militia is the draft. Congress can draft the militia.

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

women had the right to vote?

Blacks had the right to vote?

you keep throwing shit against the wall, and I:

being illegal to our own laws, doesn't imply we should be hypocrites, to less fortunate illegals.

 

[Auld Phart]

the draft?

Which only takes males between the ages of 18-26?

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

women had the right to vote?

Blacks had the right to vote?

you keep throwing shit against the wall, and I:

being illegal to our own laws, doesn't imply we should be hypocrites, to less fortunate illegals.

off topic

 

[danielpalos]

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

women had the right to vote?

Blacks had the right to vote?

you keep throwing shit against the wall, and I:

being illegal to our own laws, doesn't imply we should be hypocrites, to less fortunate illegals.

off topic

Sanctuary requires morals?

 

[P@triot]

Congress can change the law and pick any of the People, they choose.

But they haven’t, snowflake.

 

[Auld Phart]

think they are going to pick males that aren't able bodied?
Females?
anyone over a certain age? 40 maybe?
under a certain age?

so damn easy to pick apart your weak arguments

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception. the right wing is simply, reading comprehension challenged.

our federal Constitution is both gender and race neutral, from Inception.

women had the right to vote?

Blacks had the right to vote?

you keep throwing shit against the wall, and I:

being illegal to our own laws, doesn't imply we should be hypocrites, to less fortunate illegals.

off topic

Sanctuary requires morals?

what are you talking about?

The discussion is about militias.

you're way off topic.

(tho, considering how much you DON'T know about militias, I can see why you're trying to derail the thread)

 

[P@triot]

being illegal to our own laws, doesn't imply we should be hypocrites, to less fortunate illegals.

They aren’t “less fortunate” they are “more criminal”.