RollingThunder
Gold Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 4,818
- 525
- 155
That's for damn sure. You actually seem to be more of an anti-scientist who's completely clueless and just parrots propaganda you get off of denier cult blogs.Some of the environmentalist's scare stories stay in fashion and some don't. I mean, whatever happened to "acid rain"?
Environmental regulations. Whatever happened to knowing about a topic before posting? Limits on SO2 reduced the "acid rain" problem, just like banning CFCs led to the shrinking of the ozone hole. Funny how many deniers talk about "junk science". That's what they said about the two examples I gave. They just can't help being on the wrong side of science, history AND logic again, now that we're talking CO2 and GHGs.
I am not a scientist.
You make it quite obvious that you are unable to tell the difference between shit and shinola. You should be concerned with removing the oil corp propaganda poop from your skull.I'm sure that a scientist can tell the difference between dog poop and cow poop. If it's on my shoe, I'm not concerned so much with the origin as the removal.
No little dufus, CO2 levels are directly related to the current abrupt global warming/climate changes. That is because CO2 is a powerful greenhouse gas. Too bad you're too ignorant and ideologically brainwashed to understand that fact. Virtually all of the actual scientists on Earth understand it though which is why no one with more than half a brain takes you denier cult retards seriously.The content of CO2 in the air may be tangently(sic) related Climate Change.
If you keep listening to Rush, your brain will eventually wither up into something resembling a dried monkey turd. Or perhaps it already has.The connection of CFC's to the Ozone Hole may be related, but while the science is compelling, the hole is bigger than it was when the CFC's were banned. Go figure. The hole disappears and reappears every year. Every year. The wailing warnings always seem to leave that part out.
You seem to imagine that problems involving the release into the atmosphere of man-made gases in large quantities over long periods of time will clear up almost instantly as soon as we make some reduction in those releases. LOL. You have no conception of the volume of gases involved or the physics governing that gas's interaction with the rest of the atmosphere or the time scale that will be necessary to return the system to something like the previous 'normal'.
Dr. Paul Newman, a senior research scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center:
"The Antarctic ozone hole will reach sizes on the order of 8-10 million square miles nearly every year until about 2018 or so," said Newman. "Around 2018, things should slowly start improving, and somewhere between 2020 and 2025, we'll be able to detect that the ozone hole is actually beginning to decrease in size. Eventually the ozone hole will go back to its normal level around 2070 or so."
***
Last edited: