🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

So Trump is at war with the NFL........and NBA

Jesus couldn't help Tebow throw a pass. Nice kid. Yugely entertaining. Like a freaking pinball out there. But he couldn't pass, and he couldn't stay healthy taking a pounding in the NFL running that weird read option thing

Tebow was at his best improvising
Making something out of a broken play

But his QB skills running an offense were marginal

But he prayed in public, he could have Tom Brady skills and you would still hate him, we all understand who and what you are.
You’re an imbecile. Many players pray in public. Tebow can’t make a team because he sucked, not because he prayed.

share_prayer.jpg


same reason Kaepernick doesn't have a job.
That’s correct. So what?
 
He is very popular with voters...:eusa_dance:
He is? Most voters voted against him.


the illegal and dead ones voted against him. Your problem is that he is accomplishing things, doing what he promised during the campaign, making our country strong again, respected again, creating jobs, solving problems, and most off all-----------proving that liberalism is a scam that has never worked and never will.
Your hallucinations about illegals does nothing to alter the reality that most voters voted against him. And sure, he’s accomplishing things... like making sure hurricane victims who have no food, water, medicine or shelter have plenty of paper towels. Meanwhile, his biggest campaign promises remain MIA .... lock her up, build that wall, and repeal ObamaCare.

:dance:


you are a pathetic victim of the left wing media lies. Open your eyes, you are being scammed.
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
 
Jesus couldn't help Tebow throw a pass. Nice kid. Yugely entertaining. Like a freaking pinball out there. But he couldn't pass, and he couldn't stay healthy taking a pounding in the NFL running that weird read option thing

Tebow was at his best improvising
Making something out of a broken play

But his QB skills running an offense were marginal

But he prayed in public, he could have Tom Brady skills and you would still hate him, we all understand who and what you are.
You’re an imbecile. Many players pray in public. Tebow can’t make a team because he sucked, not because he prayed.

share_prayer.jpg


same reason Kaepernick doesn't have a job.
That’s correct. So what?


so nothing, just stating a fact.
 
He is? Most voters voted against him.


the illegal and dead ones voted against him. Your problem is that he is accomplishing things, doing what he promised during the campaign, making our country strong again, respected again, creating jobs, solving problems, and most off all-----------proving that liberalism is a scam that has never worked and never will.
Your hallucinations about illegals does nothing to alter the reality that most voters voted against him. And sure, he’s accomplishing things... like making sure hurricane victims who have no food, water, medicine or shelter have plenty of paper towels. Meanwhile, his biggest campaign promises remain MIA .... lock her up, build that wall, and repeal ObamaCare.

:dance:


you are a pathetic victim of the left wing media lies. Open your eyes, you are being scammed.
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.
 
the illegal and dead ones voted against him. Your problem is that he is accomplishing things, doing what he promised during the campaign, making our country strong again, respected again, creating jobs, solving problems, and most off all-----------proving that liberalism is a scam that has never worked and never will.
Your hallucinations about illegals does nothing to alter the reality that most voters voted against him. And sure, he’s accomplishing things... like making sure hurricane victims who have no food, water, medicine or shelter have plenty of paper towels. Meanwhile, his biggest campaign promises remain MIA .... lock her up, build that wall, and repeal ObamaCare.

:dance:


you are a pathetic victim of the left wing media lies. Open your eyes, you are being scammed.
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
 
Tebow was at his best improvising
Making something out of a broken play

But his QB skills running an offense were marginal

But he prayed in public, he could have Tom Brady skills and you would still hate him, we all understand who and what you are.
You’re an imbecile. Many players pray in public. Tebow can’t make a team because he sucked, not because he prayed.

share_prayer.jpg


same reason Kaepernick doesn't have a job.
That’s correct. So what?


so nothing, just stating a fact.
Great, so then we’re in agreement. It doesn’t matter if you kneel down to pray or you kneel down to protest, if you suck, you won’t work in the NFL. And Tebow sucked, that’s why he’s not playing. Not because he was publicly religious.
 
Your hallucinations about illegals does nothing to alter the reality that most voters voted against him. And sure, he’s accomplishing things... like making sure hurricane victims who have no food, water, medicine or shelter have plenty of paper towels. Meanwhile, his biggest campaign promises remain MIA .... lock her up, build that wall, and repeal ObamaCare.

:dance:


you are a pathetic victim of the left wing media lies. Open your eyes, you are being scammed.
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.
 
But he prayed in public, he could have Tom Brady skills and you would still hate him, we all understand who and what you are.
You’re an imbecile. Many players pray in public. Tebow can’t make a team because he sucked, not because he prayed.

share_prayer.jpg


same reason Kaepernick doesn't have a job.
That’s correct. So what?


so nothing, just stating a fact.
Great, so then we’re in agreement. It doesn’t matter if you kneel down to pray or you kneel down to protest, if you suck, you won’t work in the NFL. And Tebow sucked, that’s why he’s not playing. Not because he was publicly religious.


yes, to a certain extent we agree. But the media and NFL treatment of Tebow and Kaepernick was greatly different. All this kneeling bullshit was started by Kaepernick, not Tebow.
 
you are a pathetic victim of the left wing media lies. Open your eyes, you are being scammed.
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
 
Spits the forum’s most unabashed liar.


Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:
 
Ummm, nope, that would be you.
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
 
LOL

What a pity really can’t do any better than pre-K, I know you are but what am I.


the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:
 
the truth is easy, except for brainwashed morons like you.
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
 
Sadly for you, your own posts betray you.


OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?
 
OK then cite one of my posts that was a lie. put up or shut up.
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.
 
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.


winger thinks the truth is funny. no surprise there.
 
Seriously? You wanna go down this dark, dingy road again?? Are you a glutton for punishment?

Ok, whatever... start here .... and then keep reading for the next 31 posts.

:lmao:


Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.
Repeating your lies doesn't magically make them true. :eusa_naughty:

Read it again, ya lyin' moron, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment..." It was the CIA, not Obama or Hillary, who came up with that assessment. And the CIA kept pushing that narrative for two weeks until they discovered more evidence it was an attack. That is why Rice appeared on news shows during those two weeks talking about the video starting a protest.

Your bullshit has been thoroughly debunked by the GOP's own investigations. You don't get to rewrite history now because you're a biased partisan -- which is obvious by your claim there was an "Obama/Clinton administration." There was no such thing, ya imbecile. There was the Obama administration and that was it. Hillary was just one of the members of it. And claiming they fed the story of the video to the CIA is based on nothing but you, a proven liar, saying that.

:dance:
 
Last edited:
Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.


winger thinks the truth is funny. no surprise there.
LOLOL

As if you tell the truth.

:lmao:
 
Nope, the "it was caused by a video" was started by Clinton and Obozo in order to cover up the FACT that there was a terrorist attack after they said that they had practically eliminated terrorism in Libya. They came up with that lie because they were scared shitless that it might hurt them in the upcoming election.

The entire world knows it was a lie and knows why they created it. But, like a good little sheep, you will continue to worship them as they shit on your head.

Liberalism is truly a mental disease.
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.
Repeating your lies doesn't magically make them true. :eusa_naughty:

Read it again, ya lyin' moron, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment..." It was the CIA, not Obama or Hillary, who came up with that assessment. And the CIA kept pushing that narrative for two weeks until they discovered more evidence it was an attack. That is why Rice appeared on news shows during those two weeks talking about the video starting a protest.

Your bullshit has been thoroughly debunked by the GOP's own investigations. You don't get to rewrite history now because you're a biased partisan -- which is obvious by your claim there was an "Obama/Clinton administration." There was no such thing, ya imbecile. There was the Obama administration and that was it. Hillary was just one of the members of it. And claiming they fed the story of the video to the CIA is based on nothing but you, a proven liar, saying that.

:dance:


you are pathetic, who did the CIA report to during that time? you are not only a pathetic partisan, you are a naïve asshole.
 
LOLOL

Now you’re arguing with the GOP. They say you’re a gullible idiot because our intelligence community was pumping that information to the White House and State Department...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.


http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

:dance:


OK, great. that doesn't change the FACT that the "it was caused by a video" bullshit was a creation of the Obama/Clinton administration. Do you think Rice just appeared on all the news shows with that story on her own? Do you think the CIA sent her out with that story?

I understand that you have your head completely up Obama's ass, but come on, think.
Lying moron, what part of, "the Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment...," do you not understand?

Ignorant asshole! the narrative about the video was created by the Obama/Clinton administration and the CIA was directed to parrot it. It was only revealed as a lie as a result of the committee hearings. The "intelligence" to support the video theory was PLANTED by the administration. Wake the fuck up and see the world as it is, not as some fantasy planted in your tiny brain by your masters.


winger thinks the truth is funny. no surprise there.
LOLOL

As if you tell the truth.

:lmao:


99.9% of the time. the other 0.1% I try to piss off stupid liberals, and it works.
 

Forum List

Back
Top