So Trump's campaign doesn't have enough funding to July. This is hilarious for two reasons.

[Pogo]

I thought he was going to self fund this campaign? and now the campaign will not air ads for two months for lack of money?

Two problems. One, he needs to explain why he isn't funding like he said he would. Two, This is a ridiculous management problem and I thought Trump was a successful businessman with a degree from Wharton?

Guess he ran the campaign like a casino.

Or an airline.
Or a travel site.
Or a vodka.
Or "steaks".
Or a magic vitamin pyramid.
Or a board game.
Or a magazine.
Or a football team.

etc etc etc....

And Hillary will run her campaign like her marriage or bengazi.

I don't see a "Hillary" in the title.

It's weird how somebody writes "Trump" and they pronounce it "Hillary". I guess the letters are all "silent". Like "Raymond Luxury Yacht" pronounced as "Throatwarbler Mangrove".

Reading -- a lost art.

 

[Pogo]

He DID self finance the primary. And he won, now its a new race with new rules.

He did not "self-fund" the primaries. He used the $7 million plus he received in donations, and he "loaned" his campaign money. Once the Republican Party money kicks in, he repays those loans, to himself, and the whole thing has cost the Donald nothing, zip, nada.

And then he sues the RP for daring to let candidates run against him.

Like he did that author who dared to estimate his wealth lower than his bullshit, like he did Palm Beach County for planes flying over his estate (three times), like he got that analyst fired for (accurately) predicting his casino would fail, etc etc etc.

Trump has 169 Federal lawsuits pending, the man is a tort lawyer's dream come true.

Rump is an attorney-porn star.

 

[boedicca]

Adelson just gave 100 million.

Uh when exactly? It couldn't have been all that recently.

Also, oh great, 100 million from one donor. That's democracy in action right there!

Like how the Blood Minerals company from Canada have the Clinton Foundation $100M....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Clinton Foundation money can only be directed to charities, not a political campaign like a super-pac can.

The Clinton Foundation is a slush fund graft machine, bub.

NO ONE that has made that allegation has offered any proof at all. The Foundation records do not indicate fraud of any type and can be downloaded by anyone and inspected.

You are incredibly naive. Try breaking through your Prog Bubble.

http://nypost.com/2016/05/17/first-look-at-explosive-hillary-documentary-clinton-cash/

 

[Dragonlady]

I thought he was going to self fund this campaign? and now the campaign will not air ads for two months for lack of money?

Two problems. One, he needs to explain why he isn't funding like he said he would. Two, This is a ridiculous management problem and I thought Trump was a successful businessman with a degree from Wharton?

Guess he ran the campaign like a casino.

Or an airline.
Or a travel site.
Or a vodka.
Or "steaks".
Or a magic vitamin pyramid.
Or a board game.
Or a magazine.
Or a football team.

etc etc etc....

And Hillary will run her campaign like her marriage or bengazi.

Really bad analogies. A marriage isn't a political campaign, nor is an embassy attack. And Hillary didn't "run" Benghazi.

Hillary has run her candidacy in a very professional manner. She hasn't resorted in insults and innuendo. She talks about policy, unlike Trump, and she's not pulling idea which violate the Constitution, or international law out of her ass.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Uh when exactly? It couldn't have been all that recently.

Also, oh great, 100 million from one donor. That's democracy in action right there!

Like how the Blood Minerals company from Canada have the Clinton Foundation $100M....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Clinton Foundation money can only be directed to charities, not a political campaign like a super-pac can.

The Clinton Foundation is a slush fund graft machine, bub.

NO ONE that has made that allegation has offered any proof at all. The Foundation records do not indicate fraud of any type and can be downloaded by anyone and inspected.

You are incredibly naive. Try breaking through your Prog Bubble.

http://nypost.com/2016/05/17/first-look-at-explosive-hillary-documentary-clinton-cash/

What's naive is someone depending on the NY Post for their information.

 

[boedicca]

Like how the Blood Minerals company from Canada have the Clinton Foundation $100M....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Clinton Foundation money can only be directed to charities, not a political campaign like a super-pac can.

The Clinton Foundation is a slush fund graft machine, bub.

NO ONE that has made that allegation has offered any proof at all. The Foundation records do not indicate fraud of any type and can be downloaded by anyone and inspected.

You are incredibly naive. Try breaking through your Prog Bubble.

http://nypost.com/2016/05/17/first-look-at-explosive-hillary-documentary-clinton-cash/

What's naive is someone depending on the NY Post for their information.

I'll take that as a compliment coming from a moron such as yourself.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Clinton Foundation money can only be directed to charities, not a political campaign like a super-pac can.

The Clinton Foundation is a slush fund graft machine, bub.

NO ONE that has made that allegation has offered any proof at all. The Foundation records do not indicate fraud of any type and can be downloaded by anyone and inspected.

You are incredibly naive. Try breaking through your Prog Bubble.

http://nypost.com/2016/05/17/first-look-at-explosive-hillary-documentary-clinton-cash/

What's naive is someone depending on the NY Post for their information.

I'll take that as a compliment coming from a moron such as yourself.

I heard that men and women will follow you anywhere, unfortunately, it's out of morbid curiosity.

 

[Iceweasel]

He DID self finance the primary. And he won, now its a new race with new rules.

He did not "self-fund" the primaries. He used the $7 million plus he received in donations, and he "loaned" his campaign money. Once the Republican Party money kicks in, he repays those loans, to himself, and the whole thing has cost the Donald nothing, zip, nada.

...and what's your source?

Google Trump campaign loan and pick from the plethora....
Trump Campaign Could Use Donations to Pay Back Mogul's $36M Loan

I don't do homework for anybody. Beyond that an op-ed staing what could possibly happen doesn't remotely back up your claims. I'm not a libtard, op-eds are opinion articles, not a fact so they don't work for me. Try again.

 

[Dragonlady]

You are incredibly naive. Try breaking through your Prog Bubble.

http://nypost.com/2016/05/17/first-look-at-explosive-hillary-documentary-clinton-cash/

So this is based on Peter Schweizer's book, the one which he even admits is based on his speculations and which he has no proof of anything written in it.

Reviews said the producers have added no new information to the widely discredited book. In the book Schweizer claimed that less than 10% of the money goes to charity, the rest goes to the Clintons. That claim has been demonstrated to be completely false.

The IRS has said that 80% of the Clinton Foundation donations go to the work the Foundation is doing. Clinton's Foundation doesn't donate to other charities. It does the work itself. African leaders have been very vocal in their praise of the work done by the Foundation.

But you won't read any of that. Any time someone praises a liberal, you put your fingers in your ears and sing "lalalalalalalala, I can't hear you".


Of course conservatives don't care whether anything is true or not, as long as it slams Hillary. After close to 30 years of lying about the Clintons, why stop now.

 

[Iceweasel]

He DID self finance the primary. And he won, now its a new race with new rules.

He did not "self-fund" the primaries. He used the $7 million plus he received in donations, and he "loaned" his campaign money. Once the Republican Party money kicks in, he repays those loans, to himself, and the whole thing has cost the Donald nothing, zip, nada.

...and what's your source?

Every newscast and article about his so-called "self-funding". You have to be living under a rock not to have seen or heard anything about this before now.

Your source is I should have seen it by now? Goddamn, you liberals are stupid and dishonest!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Add this to the long list of things republicans loved about Trump only to find out its a lie...and they still love it.

The lie I mean, they love it.

 

[guno]

Add this to the long list of things republicans loved about Trump only to find out its a lie...and they still love it.

The lie I mean, they love it.

That is why they are called rubes

 

[Slade3200]

He DID self finance the primary. And he won, now its a new race with new rules.

He did not "self-fund" the primaries. He used the $7 million plus he received in donations, and he "loaned" his campaign money. Once the Republican Party money kicks in, he repays those loans, to himself, and the whole thing has cost the Donald nothing, zip, nada.

...and what's your source?

Google Trump campaign loan and pick from the plethora....
Trump Campaign Could Use Donations to Pay Back Mogul's $36M Loan

I don't do homework for anybody. Beyond that an op-ed staing what could possibly happen doesn't remotely back up your claims. I'm not a libtard, op-eds are opinion articles, not a fact so they don't work for me. Try again.

Just use your common sense man or try google if you want stats it's all there. Trump ain't going into the hole for this campaign he is gonna profit like a mother fucker

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Adelson just gave 100 million.

No, he didn't. Donations to actual campaigns are limited to $2,600 per election.

He gave 100 million to a Super PAC that's supporting Trump.

You know, those things that Trump said he wouldn't use?

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

 

[Kat]

Adelson just gave 100 million.

No, he didn't. Donations to actual campaigns are limited to $2,600 per election.

He gave 100 million to a Super PAC that's supporting Trump.

You know, those things that Trump said he wouldn't use?

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Adelson just gave 100 million.

No, he didn't. Donations to actual campaigns are limited to $2,600 per election.

He gave 100 million to a Super PAC that's supporting Trump.

You know, those things that Trump said he wouldn't use?

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

Do you have a link to him qualifying his statements on self-funding being only for "the primary"?

Or did you add that qualifier yourself to combat the cognate dissonance?

 

[Kat]

Adelson just gave 100 million.

No, he didn't. Donations to actual campaigns are limited to $2,600 per election.

He gave 100 million to a Super PAC that's supporting Trump.

You know, those things that Trump said he wouldn't use?

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

Do you have a link to him qualifying his statements on self-funding being only for "the primary"?

Or did you add that qualifier yourself to combat the cognate dissonance?

Neither, and I said ''thought''.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, he didn't. Donations to actual campaigns are limited to $2,600 per election.

He gave 100 million to a Super PAC that's supporting Trump.

You know, those things that Trump said he wouldn't use?

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

Do you have a link to him qualifying his statements on self-funding being only for "the primary"?

Or did you add that qualifier yourself to combat the cognate dissonance?

Neither, and I said ''thought''.

Yeah, that's my point. What made you "think" that?

Was it because he actually said it, or just because you really want to believe it?

 

[Kat]

Trump has NO control over a super pac and you know that.

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

Do you have a link to him qualifying his statements on self-funding being only for "the primary"?

Or did you add that qualifier yourself to combat the cognate dissonance?

Neither, and I said ''thought''.

Yeah, that's my point. What made you "think" that?

Was it because he actually said it, or just because you really want to believe it?

I have no reason to want to believe anything if it isn't true. I THOUGHT I remembered him saying it. But, I have heard and read so much I was not sure. Hence ''thought''.
Do You have viable proof he is literally begging for money?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I know. But he does have "control" over whether he begs for their support or not, which is where the hilarious hypocrisy comes in.

First Trump said he'd self-finance his campaign. Then he said he'd mostly self-finance, but also accept small donations from individuals.

Now he's begging billionaires to fund Super PAC for him.

Thought he said that about the Primary, not the General.

Do you have a link to him qualifying his statements on self-funding being only for "the primary"?

Or did you add that qualifier yourself to combat the cognate dissonance?

Neither, and I said ''thought''.

Yeah, that's my point. What made you "think" that?

Was it because he actually said it, or just because you really want to believe it?

I have no reason to want to believe anything if it isn't true. I THOUGHT I remembered him saying it. But, I have heard and read so much I was not sure. Hence ''thought''.
Do You have viable proof he is literally begging for money?

Yep.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/14/us/politics/sheldon-adelson-donald-trump.html

They had a "private meeting", and now Adelson's gonna fund a Trump SuperPAC for $100 Million dollars.