Your desperation is duly noted! Please note the change in the official warmist dogma. The top one is from dr. Viner who's famous quote has been the butt of water cooler jokes for over a decade now...
Then look at the Nat Geo article. Notice how the warming (climate change) can make more snow? So, which is it? Does global warming make more or less snow? This is the falsifiability part here. It can do one or the other, but it can't do both. Do you now understand why? To their credit (I think even Nat Geo now understands that AGW theory is dead, they're just trying to cover their butts because they were big supporters of it) they interviewed Joe Bastardi, one of the best meteorologists out there, and an avowed sceptic.
"Global warming, the heating of the atmosphere by increased amounts of industrial gases, is now accepted as a reality by the international community. Average temperatures in Britain were nearly 0.6°C higher in the Nineties than in 1960-90, and it is estimated that they will increase by 0.2C every decade over the coming century. Eight of the 10 hottest years on record occurred in the Nineties.
However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".
"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said."
Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past - Environment - The Independent
As snowstorm-ravaged states on the U.S. East Coast dig out, scientists say the past week's "Snowpocalypse" could be a taste of harsh winters to comeand that, strangely enough, global warming may be to blame. Others aren't so sure.
More Mega-Snowstorms Coming -- Global Warming to Blame?
Thats why they have peer reviewed science so you can find out what they agree on instead of taking a quote from this guy and that individual.
I notice you never touch the peer reviewed stuff just random quotes and following with "Aha!" Dont look at a Nat Geo article. Or what Time mag said in the 70's. Tell me why the peer reviewed data is wrong.
Yeah, the problem with your assertion is they corrupted that process to where, in one now infamous case, the "peer reviewer" was the mans wife. With a record like they have, it's hard to take any of their "pal" reviewed papers seriously...don't you think?
