Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
100 million? Really? You seem unaware that overturning Roe does not make abortion illegal. It has no effect on all (100%) of women in states where abortion is legal. The real issue is a violation of the integrity of the Supreme Court.
If you don't like it, get the law in your state changed.
Cancer treatment does not kill a third person. You are afraid that some states will make abortion illegal. You don't want people to vote do you. How dare people in a state vote to make abortion illegal. Take that vote away.
Yes, and a clerk to the Supreme Court should exemplify the highest of standards. The leaker is guilty of an attack from within, and should be brought to justice.The first thing I think of is ethics. This was unethical at the very least, to leak a supreme court justices unpublished writings. This might have been something that was in the process of working its way through their system, and now it's been leaked, and therefore it's going to be hotly debated and could influence the supreme court decision.
Now, I'm sure you are going to say that's a good thing in this case. Do you really want law clerks doing things that can have adverse affects on the justices?
It also creates a trust issue. Now the justices are going to have to look over their shoulder on everything. Who's going to be the next person to leak one of our drafts?
It'd a bad thing when you have 1 unappointed law clerk that can upend the entire supreme court.
The punishment should be about the sane as for any other traitor.
Probably, but, where did the supreme court get the power to grant specific and individual rights in the first place? Where does scotus get the power to make a decision that forces the entire country to accept a specific procedure?
Healthcare should be a state issue, why does the federal gov need to be involved?
What if the federal government makes a law stating you must have a healthy lifestyle to get cancer treatment? Now the whole country is stuck with it, where if it was states rights, it won't affect you if you don't live in that state.
The problem with federal gov having that kind of unbridled power is, eventually they will make a law that you don't like. Remember, repubs also have majorities sometimes, too.
I'm thinking if it was a Republican, they did it knowing the democrats would spend all their money fighting this. Instead of campaigning for the up coming election.
The Supreme Court is all about the Constitution; not parties. Divulging state secrets is treason and always has been.
Yes, and a clerk to the Supreme Court should exemplify the highest of standards. The leaker is guilty of an attack from within, and should be brought to justice.
I suspect the charges will be determined once the traitor is identified, and I suspect if it’s a Republican, the Dems will be screaming for insurrection charges and life in prison. If it’s a Democrat, they will be holding him or her up as a hero, and elect him to Congress next session.
the other justices and their clerks---would know better and haven't leaked like this before. The logical conclusion is Jackson and her clerks.Seems there are different possibilities here.
One prevailing thought of course, is that it's a liberal clerk, who leaked it with the hope that once the justices see the massive outcry, one or more them might change their vote.
Another, is the idea that it's one of the conservative justices, who not wanting to see another situation like that occurred when Roberts got cold feet and changed his vote reaffirming Obamacare. By leaking the decision, it could put pressure on the conservative justices to stay the course and not be remembered like Roberts will always be remembered.
It won't make abortion illegal. Just puts it to the states to decide. As it should be. Also need to do it with education also.Actually this decision is the best thing that could have happened to Democrats for the upcoming election. Now every congressional election will be about a woman's right to choose. All those suburban Karens who were horrified their little angel was about to learn about imaginary CRT now has a REAL problem to worry about.
How is a decision they are about to inflict on us a "State Secret". This decision WOULD have come out in June. The only effect MIGHT be that Congress might vote to enshrine Roe into Federal Law before the decision is released, rendering it moot.
Absa-Fukin-Lutely!Smart Vegas Money says it was a Woke little Leftist law clerk - a dishonorable action that will - and SHOULD - cost the clerk his/her/its career in The Law.
Apparently you haven’t learned that a SCOTUS ruling is not a “right”.26 states will outlaw abortion or limit it the moment Roe is overturned. One shouldn't have to work to get a right women have enjoyed for 50 years.
Fetuses aren't people.
Yes, I am very worried women will be maimed when they get illegal abortions.
It won't make abortion illegal. Just puts it to the states to decide. As it should be. Also need to do it with education also.
Everyone notice that the Dems are OK with the leaker performing this egregious, unethical, and possibly illegal attack on the Supreme Court because they think the ends justifies the means - and, on another level, they hate America and are fine with ripping its institutions to threads?
If Democrats really do have dirt on Roberts, maybe concerning pedophile island, they can make him do whatever they want. When Trump is President again, he should devote the first month to draining the swamp. For starters, he needs to abolish the speech police, remove McCarthy and McConnell from leadership, and replace Roberts with a law-abiding judge that has nothing to hide.
I always found it strange how Roberts twisted himself into a pretzel to interpret Obamacare as constitutional. The Dems have something on him.If Democrats really do have dirt on Roberts, maybe concerning pedophile island, they can make him do whatever they want. When Trump is President again, he should devote the first month to draining the swamp. For starters, he needs to abolish the speech police, remove McCarthy and McConnell from leadership, and replace Roberts with a law-abiding judge that has nothing to hide.
No way .... Seriously doubt if any of the justices had anything to do with this. Some office boy who thought he was going to become an avenging angel.My best guess is John Robert's or a clerk for him.
He's a closet gay.... Which nowadays in itself isn't so bad.I always found it strange how Roberts twisted himself into a pretzel to interpret Obamacare as constitutional. The Dems have something on him.
Could be true. They certainly have something on him. That’s how Dems operate: blackmail.He's a closet gay.... Which nowadays in itself isn't so bad.
The problem is that I have seen what appear to be photographs of him entering a hotel with young men during his marriage.
Very true but not criminalThat’s to be determined. But violating the confidence of the Supreme Court, when one is a lawyer uphold to certain behavior, is certainly grounds for dismissal from the profession for life.
