Remarkably, the Socialist wants a challenger to the ultra liberal President Obama to serve as an anchor, of sorts, to stop the President's alleged drift to the RIGHT! ". . . I think one of the reasons the president has been able to move so far to the right is that there is no primary opposition to him . . . ."
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Sanders: Would be 'good' for Obama to face primary challenge - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room
This President (with a couple of exceptions which I concede) has been as far left as anybody could possibly be and still be an American President.
There has never been as far left a flaming lib in the Oval Office as this President.
Yet for the Socialist Senator from the lame State of Vermont, that's not far ENOUGH left.![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Putting his "reason" aside, who agrees with ol' Bernie?
SHOULD the President get a CHALLENGER from within the ranks of the liberal Democrat Parody?
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Sanders: Would be 'good' for Obama to face primary challenge - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room
This President (with a couple of exceptions which I concede) has been as far left as anybody could possibly be and still be an American President.
There has never been as far left a flaming lib in the Oval Office as this President.
Yet for the Socialist Senator from the lame State of Vermont, that's not far ENOUGH left.
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Putting his "reason" aside, who agrees with ol' Bernie?
SHOULD the President get a CHALLENGER from within the ranks of the liberal Democrat Parody?