Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A hundred posts by Abu afuc and not one quote or comment from the report this OP is based on!!!!23 posts by elektra and No posts about Solar being the cheapest... or Not.
Not a Single post Contradicting or even Addressing the OP.
I have put up Multiple Links including the OP and the top of the last page replete with Chart, etc, to prove my point.
He doesn't logically argue the point, and denies everything, just link bashes credible links like the IEA and Popular Science.
This is like 'debating' the Creationists/Evolution-deniers in the Science section.
What a mb!
elektra is a total washout/FRAUD with ZERO counterargument.
At least he's keeping my thread at the top of the section and UNWITtingly helping me forward my Title and put up more and more evidence, with still More Coming.
Nothing like a weak opponent (in this case NO opponent/empty basher) to help win a point.
Hope the next 10 pages are as easy as the first.
24 posts by elektra and No posts about Solar being the cheapest... or Not.A hundred posts by Abu afuc and not one quote or comment from the report this OP is based on!!!!
And yes, I get it, you are pleading for me to stop by pointing out you are at the top of the page.
Quote and comment on your link, moron!
www.wsj.com
Works fine for me. Maybe you're the problem...lolBusted link but congrats on breaking the 10 word barrier for a change.
From the search terms/link I can see it's about Federal O&G subsidies which I haven't brought up one way or another, and never alleged.
You may want to address your post to Old Rocks.
`
Except and again, You posted to me AS IF I made a claim of O&G getting subsidies.Works fine for me. Maybe you're the problem...lol
You laughed at my post that corrected the lie that oil and gas companies get subsidies. Why did you laugh, if you agreed with me?Except and again, You posted to me AS IF I made a claim of O&G getting subsidies.
I did not, nor close to it.
So YOU are still the confused one/problem.
(but keeping your posts 10 words or less, consistent with what you know about anything)
`
Yet you never quote or comment on the report that the "news" article you link to, refers to.24 posts by elektra and No posts about Solar being the cheapest... or Not.
Not a Single post Contradicting or even Addressing the OP.
I have put up Multiple Links including the OP and the top of the last page replete with Chart, etc, to prove my point.
He doesn't logically argue the point, and denies everything, just link bashes very credible links like the IEA and Popular Science.
This is like 'debating' the Creationists/Evolution-deniers in the Science section.
What a mb!
elektra is a total washout/FRAUD with ZERO counterargument.
-
IAC
Here is Another Link from just 3 days ago from my HOME Page: the Wall Street Journal.
"..THE COST
Solar has increasingly become one of the cheapest power sources, judged by the levelized cost of electricity—a way used to compare potential investments that considers the present cost of building a power plant against the power generated over its expected lifetime. Levelized costs are usually in price per megawatt-hour, or one million watts of electricity for an hour.
The levelized cost of solar photovoltaic systems has fallen to about $45 per megawatt-hour this year from $381 in 2010, according to IHS Markit. That makes it the CHEAPEST form of electricity on a Global basis, and doesn’t take into account tax breaks or other subsidies that governments may provide, which would push costs Down More. Coal-fired generation is around $55 per megawatt-hour, down from $62 in 2010.
Falling costs have made panels more affordable to a wider range of homeowners and has shortened payback times.".."
How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy?
There’s a lot of hype and confusion about carbon-free energy sources. Here’s a look at five of them: how much they produce, what they cost, and what obstacles they face.
What a Rout!
`
Here ya go!
World Energy Outlook 2020 – Analysis - IEA
World Energy Outlook 2020 - Analysis and key findings. A report by the International Energy Agency.www.iea.org
Keep Digging Little ****.
Let's go for WHIFF #21 (Excuse NOT to tackle THEE Thread topic) by elektra/bye elektra.
It absolutely was there, you saw/quoted it, and now the link is temporarily not working, but you had chance to read/cite/refute all and Any of it.I guess this will be my 25th post with abu afuc failing to comment, quote, or link to the report his/her entire OP is based on.
I followed your link and it is broken, leads to nowhere? I guess it is not up to the author of an OP to provide links they make claims from. It is not up to the author of an OP to quote a link so we can actually talk about something. It is not even up to the author of an OP to read what that dictate everyone else must read and believe and comment on.
You are a lazy fucking bastard that don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.
View attachment 563684
No you stupid ****.You laughed at my post that corrected the lie that oil and gas companies get subsidies. Why did you laugh, if you agreed with me?
You were saying?...lolNo you stupid ****.
That was Old Rocks who gave you a funny.
And now you post AGAIN to me AS IF I were he, despite me already correcting your mistaken identity once already.
Does 'Old Rocks' look like 'abu afak' to you LSD guy?
What a loon.
`
YOU were having a discussion with Old Rocks on the subsidy topic.You were saying?...lolView attachment 563718
If my posts are so irrelevant you need not scream and cry and rant so heavily against them.24 posts by elektra and No posts about Solar being the cheapest... or Not.
Not a Single post Contradicting or even Addressing the OP.
I have put up Multiple Links including the OP and the top of the last page replete with Chart, etc, to prove my point.
He doesn't logically argue the point, and denies everything, just link bashes very credible links like the IEA and Popular Science.
This is like 'debating' the Creationists/Evolution-deniers in the Science section.
What a mb!
elektra is a total washout/FRAUD with ZERO counterargument.
-
IAC
Here is Another Link from just 3 days ago from my HOME Page: the Wall Street Journal.
"..THE COST
Solar has increasingly become one of the cheapest power sources, judged by the levelized cost of electricity—a way used to compare potential investments that considers the present cost of building a power plant against the power generated over its expected lifetime. Levelized costs are usually in price per megawatt-hour, or one million watts of electricity for an hour.
The levelized cost of solar photovoltaic systems has fallen to about $45 per megawatt-hour this year from $381 in 2010, according to IHS Markit. That makes it the CHEAPEST form of electricity on a Global basis, and doesn’t take into account tax breaks or other subsidies that governments may provide, which would push costs Down More. Coal-fired generation is around $55 per megawatt-hour, down from $62 in 2010.
Falling costs have made panels more affordable to a wider range of homeowners and has shortened payback times.".."
How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy?
There’s a lot of hype and confusion about carbon-free energy sources. Here’s a look at five of them: how much they produce, what they cost, and what obstacles they face.
What a Rout!
`
Bullshit, you are a liar, I never quoted from your broken link.It absolutely was there, you saw/quoted it, and now the link is temporarily not working, but you had chance to read/cite/refute all and Any of it.
Now with the WSJ I posted, You want the reverse: the Link/Whole article and not just the relevant quote.
LOL.
YOU'VE WIFFED for the 25th, 26th, and 27th time on any chance of "Discussing it."
(another of your multi-post inadequacy/bury attempts)
I've been demanding discussion, while you just link bash.
WTF.
Now you say you want to "discuss" the topic?
You could have at ANY time.
You conspicuously avoided ANY topical discussion.
I've posted the IEA via carbonbrief in the OP, and (on demand) separately, PopularScience, and now the WSJ.
WTF!
Fact is you have ZERO to discuss after I DID discuss YOUR now non sequitur PolyS claim. (and RW conspiracy link)
YOU'VE WIFFED for the 25th, 26th, and 27th time on any chance of "Discussing it."
I've been demanding discussion, while you just link bash.
`
Why are you quoting my post which points out you WHIFFED on the thread topic for the 24th time, instead of the later one which (names my major links) and Points out you've Whiffed on the thread Topic for the 25th, 26th, and 27th time in one of your Multi-post burial attempts instead of saying Anything ON TOPIC. Dodging many Credible links, and any discussion of the cost of solar.If my posts are so irrelevant you need not scream and cry and rant so heavily against them.
Off topic? Polysilicon is off topic in a thread about Solar cells made from polysilicon.Because they are ALL off Topic, and as we both know, you're a Fraud.
You have never even addressed the thread topic.
Credible links? Your links are broke.Dodging many Credible links, and any discussion of the cost of solar.
And BTW, those are some might strange hours you keep.
RW posting from 2AM to 5AM. (to say nothing)
Credible links? Your links are broke.
You don't quote from your links.
Links don't mean shit, even more so when the author of the OP has not read or quoted from them.
www.iea.org
Don't confuse the OP with facts. He's from a third world shit hole where facts can be anything he is told.If you tax folks 10¢/kW-hr ... and charge them 2¢/kW-hr ... the cost is 12¢/kW-hr ... I'm just pointing out a rather lengthy article about how cheap solar is only has ONE sentence about the actual costs ...
