Solution to London machete terror attack:

Alot of muslim women from Yemen are coming over here for visits right before their due date..... The babies are born American citizens, get all the benefits of US citizenship, etc.. That has become a rampant problem. Again no news media stories about it. G-d forbid we should start telling folks what is going in here. People do not truly understand how many muslims have become us citizens who are not even living here. Many of these children are being raised in foreign countries for jihad and can come back under that us citizenship. Scary, eh? - J.
 
Last edited:
That is pretty disgusting, but I am assuming for now that they only mean to do that for a few days or a couple weeks? Cameron hot-footed it back from France because those Nigerians said they meant to start a race war, and so soldiers would be particularly vulnerable, presumably, if easy to identify.

I don't think it's awful to stop with uniforms for a few days till the situation calms. After that.................that would be creepy, I agree, if Britain has to hide its soldiers, its whites, its Christians, for fear they'll all be chopped up.

I hope to god thats not the case, I can't believe it.

How about wear the uniform and start wearing a gun with it instead? Now there is a novel idea for a soldier, eh? Let them start carrying weapons and for that matter start allowing the police over there to carry guns instead of those silly little batons they whirl around. Ridiculous!

I agree with you.
 
A typical liberal reaction @ Solution to London machete terror attack: ban uniforms | Human Events Sickening!
The horrific murder of a soldier by a pair of self-described jihadis, in broad daylight on the streets of London yesterday, posed quite a conundrum. London is already a gigantic “gun-free zone,” although according to some reports the jihad killers somehow managed to get their hands on a firearm anyway. The murder weapons were knives and cleavers, which are common household and garden implements. The murderers began their savage and cowardly attack by running the victim down with a car, but despite the best efforts of environmentalists, cars haven’t been banned yet. So… what can the British government ban in response to this attack?

Uniforms!

:cuckoo:
Democracy would have prevented the latest London terror attacks:

"London...

"The British Stop the War Coalition (StWC) held a protest in London which it claimed was the largest political demonstration in the city's history. Police estimated attendance as well in excess of 750,000 people[33] and the BBC estimated that around a million attended.[34] The protest was organised under the slogan "No war on Iraq - freedom for Palestine."

February 15, 2003 anti-war protest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
A typical liberal reaction @ Solution to London machete terror attack: ban uniforms | Human Events Sickening!
The horrific murder of a soldier by a pair of self-described jihadis, in broad daylight on the streets of London yesterday, posed quite a conundrum. London is already a gigantic “gun-free zone,” although according to some reports the jihad killers somehow managed to get their hands on a firearm anyway. The murder weapons were knives and cleavers, which are common household and garden implements. The murderers began their savage and cowardly attack by running the victim down with a car, but despite the best efforts of environmentalists, cars haven’t been banned yet. So… what can the British government ban in response to this attack?

Uniforms!

:cuckoo:

they already have some pretty stiff restrictions on long knives and such

perhaps it is time for a outright ban on them
 
NOW THE END BEGINS: What You Need To Know About Sharia Law

Sharia For Dummies. There may be some of you out there reading this article who have heard the term "sharia" but don't really know what it is. So we present to you 34 actual points of Sharia law to give you an idea what it would be live to live under it. Then you can decide for yourself if it's a good thing or a bad thing.


This is the true face of Islam in the UK, which many say will soon make it's way to the United States.

1- Jihad, defined as "to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion," is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.

2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.

3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.

4- A percentage of Zakat (charity money) must go towards jihad.

5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.


A Muslim woman receiving Sharia justice. She is about to be stoned to death.
6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.

7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph if he rejects Islam.

8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.

9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostate 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Vigilante street justice and honor killing is acceptable.

10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim, but will get it for killing a Muslim.

11- Sharia never abolished slavery, sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.

12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging even for crimes of sin such as adultery.


A Muslim man receiving Sharia justice - a public flogging which more than likely killed him.

13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims under the law. They must comply to Islamic law if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.

14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. But Muslims can curse non-Muslims.

15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.

16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.


A young boy in Iran got caught stealing bread in a market, and this was his punishment...


...having his hand crushed under the wheel of a moving truck....


Is this "justice" to you? Or is it barbaric cruelty? You will notice the man with the microphone on the right, holding the boy's arm in place while the truck rides over it. source - Trosch.org


17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or bathhouse attendants. Women in low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.

18- A non-Muslim cannot rule -- even over a non-Muslim minority.


19- Homosexuality is punishable by death.

20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and can be consummated at age 8 or 9.

21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband's obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.


Women who live under Sharia law are not much more than a possession, bound and hidden behind a head to toe mask.

22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: "I divorce you" and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.

23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband's property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.

24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits.

25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and none of them have a right to divorce him -- even if he is polygamous.


26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman's sexual organs.

27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.

28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.

29- A woman loses custody if she remarries.

30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.


Islam is not looking for acceptance, they are looking for dominance.

31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.

32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body, which is considered "Awrah," a sexual organ. Not all Sharia schools allow the face of a woman exposed.

33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife at the time he caught her in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women, since the man "could be married to the woman he was caught with."

34-It is obligatory for a Muslim to lie if the purpose is obligatory. That means that for the sake of abiding with Islam's commandments, such as jihad, a Muslim is obliged to lie and should not have any feelings of guilt or shame associated with this kind of lying. source - WND - Nonie Darwish
 
Great Britain has allowed Sharia Law into their country. It has allowed Sharia Courts to operate in their country. WHY?

Great Britain INS'T A MUSLIM COUNTRY. They shouldn't ALLOW THE BARBARIC COSTUMES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TO GO INTO EFFECT, but they do anyway. And the Muslims get bolder and bolder as they want the entire country Muslim with Sharia Law.

And now one of their Nut Bag Muslims beheads a British Soldier for their Islamic BS CUSTOMS.
 
Australian Prime Minister about Muslim Sharia Law.
December 29, 2009Koos Jan SchoutenLeave a commentGo to comments
This man should be appointed King of the World. Truer words have never been spoken.

It took a lot of courage for this man to speak what he had to say for the world to hear. The retribution could be phenomenal, but at least he was willing to take a stand on his and Australia’s beliefs.

The Whole World Needs A Leader Like This!

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd – Australia

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

Separately, Rudd angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques. Quote: ‘IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians. ‘

‘This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom’

‘We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society . Learn the language!’

‘Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.’

‘We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.’

‘This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, ‘THE RIGHT TO LEAVE’.’

‘If you aren’t happy here then LEAVE. We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.’
 
"Anyone of any faith with a sense of humanity is repulsed by this brutal and cowardly murder. The American Muslim community condemns this senseless attack in the strongest possible terms. The only response to such inhumanity is for all people of conscience to unite and ensure that the rule of law and justice prevail."

CAIR Statement in Response to Attack on Soldier in London - CAIR

Ten years ago somewhere between 750,000 and 1,000,000 Brits marched in opposition to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. Had democracy and the rule of law and justice prevailed at that time, terror incidents world wide would be a fraction of what they are today.
 
A typical liberal reaction @ Solution to London machete terror attack: ban uniforms | Human Events Sickening!
The horrific murder of a soldier by a pair of self-described jihadis, in broad daylight on the streets of London yesterday, posed quite a conundrum. London is already a gigantic “gun-free zone,” although according to some reports the jihad killers somehow managed to get their hands on a firearm anyway. The murder weapons were knives and cleavers, which are common household and garden implements. The murderers began their savage and cowardly attack by running the victim down with a car, but despite the best efforts of environmentalists, cars haven’t been banned yet. So… what can the British government ban in response to this attack?

Uniforms!

:cuckoo:

Yeah... those damn military commanders. Liberals every one of them.
 
"Anyone of any faith with a sense of humanity is repulsed by this brutal and cowardly murder. The American Muslim community condemns this senseless attack in the strongest possible terms. The only response to such inhumanity is for all people of conscience to unite and ensure that the rule of law and justice prevail."

CAIR Statement in Response to Attack on Soldier in London - CAIR

Ten years ago somewhere between 750,000 and 1,000,000 Brits marched in opposition to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. Had democracy and the rule of law and justice prevailed at that time, terror incidents world wide would be a fraction of what they are today.

And if a FROG HAD WINGS HE WOULDN'T BUMP HIS BUTT WHEN HE JUMPED.

If we JUST THINK NICE THOUGHTS THEY WILL GO AWAY..... Tap your red shoes together and say There is No place like home, ......there is no place like home............
 
Judge upholds CAIR official’s conviction in terrorism funding case

by Jack Minor –
A Federal court has upheld the conviction of multiple officials with the Council on American Islamic Relations and others for providing funding to a terrorist group.
The Holy Land Foundation trial was the largest terrorism funding trial in American history. CAIR, the Islamic Society of North America and other Muslim organizations were named as un-indicted co-conspirators in the case.
While the first trial ended in a hung jury, a subsequent trial found the parties guilty on charges of material support of terrorism.
The Holy Land Foundation was once the largest Muslim charity organization in the United States. HLF was under investigation for years before finally being closed down by the Bush administration after the terrorist attacks on 9/11.
On Wednesday, Judge Carolyn Dineen King, with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, issued a ruling upholding the conviction.
King wrote, “While no trial is perfect, this one included, we conclude from our review of the record, briefs, and oral argument, that the defendants were fairly convicted. For the reasons explained below, therefore, we affirm the district court’s judgments of conviction of the individual defendants. We dismiss the appeal of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development.”
One of the convictions upheld was Ghassan Elashi, founder of CAIR’s Texas chapter. Elashi received a 65-year prison sentence for funneling over $12 million from the Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation to the jihad terrorist group Hamas, which is responsible for murdering hundreds of Israeli civilians.
CAIR, which says it is dedicated to enhance understanding of Islam and empower American Muslims, has had multiple leaders within the organization that have either had ties to or been convicted in terrorism cases. Some of them include:
Nihad Awad: Executive director of CAIR. Wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case placed Awad at a Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders and activists in 1993 that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charitable giving. According to FBI transcripts, Awad was recorded discussing the propaganda effort during the meeting.
Omar Ahmad: Founder of CAIR and chairman emeritus. U.S. prosecutors named Ahmad as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case. FBI special agent, Lara Burns, testified at the trial that Ahmad was also at the Philadelphia meeting. Prosecutors also designated him as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Palestine Committee” in America.
Bassem Khafagi: CAIR’s former community relations director, was arrested for involvement with the Islamic Assembly of North America, which was linked to al-Qaida. After pleading guilty to visa and bank fraud charges, Khafagi was deported.
Abdurahman Alamoudi: Another CAIR director, Alamoudi is currently serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. according to the U.S. Treasury Department, Alamoudi, who was caught on tape complaining that bin Laden hadn’t killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, was one of al-Qaida’s top fundraisers in America.
Mousa Abu Marzook, a former CAIR official, was designated by the U.S. government in 1995 as a “terrorist and Hamas leader.” He now is a Hamas leader in Syria.
Randall Royer: Former civil rights coordinator for CAIR. In 2004 Royer began serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding al-Qaida and the Taliban against American troops in Afghanistan.
 
If I had my way that murderous bastard's head would now be on a pike and placed at the exact spot where he beheaded the soldiers. I wouldn't take it down until it had been picked clean by blowflies, and then I'd throw it in the nearest pig pen.
 
If I had my way that murderous bastard's head would now be on a pike and placed at the exact spot where he beheaded the soldiers. I wouldn't take it down until it had been picked clean by blowflies, and then I'd throw it in the nearest pig pen.

I wish they'd have blown him away at the scene so we wouldn't have the BS we have now. My feelings about this SCUMBAG are mutual.
 
Spare me CAIR'S CONCERNS.

They are a FRONT.
Who are they a FRONT for?
Those who get rich from killing Muslims?

I smell camel..............sniff sniff

Which part of the case I quoted don't you understand? They have already been tried and convicted for SUPPORTING TERRORISM.

Rich from killing Muslims...............a LIBERAL DRONE ATTACK.................

If they would STOP COMMITTING ACTS OF TERROR then they WOULD STOP DYING IN RETALIATION. They refuse, so COUNTRIES LIKE THE U.S. STRIKE BACK.

They can choose Peace over War. IT'S THEIR DECISION.
 
"Anyone of any faith with a sense of humanity is repulsed by this brutal and cowardly murder. The American Muslim community condemns this senseless attack in the strongest possible terms. The only response to such inhumanity is for all people of conscience to unite and ensure that the rule of law and justice prevail."

CAIR Statement in Response to Attack on Soldier in London - CAIR

Ten years ago somewhere between 750,000 and 1,000,000 Brits marched in opposition to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. Had democracy and the rule of law and justice prevailed at that time, terror incidents world wide would be a fraction of what they are today.

And if a FROG HAD WINGS HE WOULDN'T BUMP HIS BUTT WHEN HE JUMPED.

If we JUST THINK NICE THOUGHTS THEY WILL GO AWAY..... Tap your red shoes together and say There is No place like home, ......there is no place like home............
Your shoes are stained red with the blood of innocent Muslims, Dorothy:

"The armed forces of the United States of America have committed war crimes throughout every war they had been involved in. Most - but not all - contemporary war crimes are defined by the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Geneva Conventions, and the associated laws of war under international law.[1] War crimes can be prosecuted through the War Crimes Act of 1996 in the United States, but the US government does not accept the jurisdiction of the ICC over its military forces.[2]

"United States violations of the laws of war falling under the rubric of jus in bello are discussed in the present article, while US violations of jus ad bellum, such as crimes against peace or wars of aggression under the Nuremberg Principles,[3] are discussed elsewhere[where..."

United States war crimes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are you proud?
 
A typical liberal reaction @ Solution to London machete terror attack: ban uniforms | Human Events Sickening!
The horrific murder of a soldier by a pair of self-described jihadis, in broad daylight on the streets of London yesterday, posed quite a conundrum. London is already a gigantic “gun-free zone,” although according to some reports the jihad killers somehow managed to get their hands on a firearm anyway. The murder weapons were knives and cleavers, which are common household and garden implements. The murderers began their savage and cowardly attack by running the victim down with a car, but despite the best efforts of environmentalists, cars haven’t been banned yet. So… what can the British government ban in response to this attack?

Uniforms!

:cuckoo:
Do you really think in such simplistic terms? It is not the 'solution.' It is a preventative measure. They have hardly had time to put together a solution.

I realize you think the solution is arming every citizen and turning the UK into Dodge City. Fortunately the British are not that childish.
 
"Anyone of any faith with a sense of humanity is repulsed by this brutal and cowardly murder. The American Muslim community condemns this senseless attack in the strongest possible terms. The only response to such inhumanity is for all people of conscience to unite and ensure that the rule of law and justice prevail."

CAIR Statement in Response to Attack on Soldier in London - CAIR

Ten years ago somewhere between 750,000 and 1,000,000 Brits marched in opposition to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. Had democracy and the rule of law and justice prevailed at that time, terror incidents world wide would be a fraction of what they are today.

And if a FROG HAD WINGS HE WOULDN'T BUMP HIS BUTT WHEN HE JUMPED.

If we JUST THINK NICE THOUGHTS THEY WILL GO AWAY..... Tap your red shoes together and say There is No place like home, ......there is no place like home............
Your shoes are stained red with the blood of innocent Muslims, Dorothy:

"The armed forces of the United States of America have committed war crimes throughout every war they had been involved in. Most - but not all - contemporary war crimes are defined by the International Criminal Court (ICC), the Geneva Conventions, and the associated laws of war under international law.[1] War crimes can be prosecuted through the War Crimes Act of 1996 in the United States, but the US government does not accept the jurisdiction of the ICC over its military forces.[2]

"United States violations of the laws of war falling under the rubric of jus in bello are discussed in the present article, while US violations of jus ad bellum, such as crimes against peace or wars of aggression under the Nuremberg Principles,[3] are discussed elsewhere[where..."

United States war crimes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are you proud?


Are you American? The blood of the innocent? Since Carter the rags have been pushing for a fight, and they got one after they KILLED THE INNOCENT ON 9/11. They are currently on a JIHAD AGAINST ALL THOSE NOT OF THEIR FAITH. They wanted this and can go to hell for all I care. They can get their 72 virgins, except they didn't know they'd all be Rosie Oddonells.

I'm sure Nice people in Germany died when we fought HITLER. I'm sure NICE PEOPLE died in JAPAN IN WWII. Yet this happens in War, and the NICE GUYS GO DOWN WITH THE EVIL ONES. That's been going on since the dawn of time. Nothing has changed in that aspect.

Am I proud? ABSOLUTELY. America has stood against tyranny for a long time. We have STOPPED THE HITLERS AND THE JAPANESE. We stood against Russian and Stalin would slaughtered 10'S OF MILLIONS OF THEIR OWN. And we NOW STAND AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM and CONTINUED ATTACKS AGAINST ALL WHO DON'T BELIEVE AS THEY DO.

Am I PROUD? YOUR DAMN SKIPPY.
 

Forum List

Back
Top