Some COVID-19 FACTS Not shared with Americans....WHY?

In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646

Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country. In other words, you're cherry picking the stats to suit your narrative. If people wanted to do math, they could sit down and come up with these numbers. But with approaching 140K dead, 3.4 million infections and rising, and the resulting 11% unemployment and the inevitable second wave of shutdowns that are coming, who gives a shit? You're not telling the whole story. And you're ignoring what is being reported in the news every day. Hospitals in the south stretched to resource limits, lack of PPE, what this virus does to the body..even in people who don't have to be hospitalized, how easily it can be spread. The fact that children can carry it and infect their parents, grandparents and teacher...without them even knowing it.

I've zero idea for what is to be gained by constantly spouting the same "See, See!!, only X number of people have died!!". You can sit here and put the word SURVIVE into as big a bold as you want. But you don't acknowledge the fact that a lot of these people will never be the same health wise. And I've yet to figure out what your motives are for doing this other than the vain hopes to bolster the re-election chances of You-Know-Who.
You're the one who's telling only part of the story, shit for brains. Despite more infections being reported, COVID deaths are way down. The 11% unemployment is a result of this insane shutdown. We have plenty of PPE. What the virus does to the body in 99% of cases is nothing.

The evidence shows that the odds of children becoming infected or passing it on to adults is almost zero.

You're a hysteria monger who wants to destroy this country economically so your senile pedophile can win an election.

NOW they're trying to tell us that they KNOW, for an absolute fact, that there are long-term effects and what they are. HOW?! It hasn't been around long enough for any long-term effects to show up. And right on cue, the useful idiots in the street are screeching about how EVERYONE who gets Covid-19 is going to have these effects and be permanently damaged for the rest of their lives.

I guess this is their new panic line to take the place of "It's an automatic death sentence!" since the death rates are dropping.

A lot of people will. A lot of people already have, including children. Doesn't matter if it hasn't been around long enough in your opinion. Not everyone will get long term damage. But a lot will. It's already being documented. All you have to do is read.
 
I lived through 1957 Hong Kong, 1968 flu when between the two nearly 220,000 people died. NO SHUT DOWN and NO 7/24 media coverage also!
So did I... and Lawn Darts, and BB guns, and walking to and from school alone, riding my 5hp mini bike without a helmet, playing with sharp metal things, no car seats or seat belts and the list goes on and on, all without PANIC or SHUT DOWNS.

How the hell did we survive?
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
NOT my statistics correct these people:Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,697 Cases and 615,350 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
I just copy them down.
View attachment 365695

View attachment 365694
I’m not arguing specifically the numbers, I’m arguing the interpretation of what “serious critical” means as being current vs cumulative.

It’s absolutely obvious that this tab is current ICU admissions.
Again... not my definitions. Seriously question these people....I'd be interested to see your results. Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,874 Cases and 615,354 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Yes, it is your definition. You decided the tab meant one thing when it clearly meant something different.

Show me where that website lists the definition for that tab, indicating whether it's current or cumulative.
 
I lived through 1957 Hong Kong, 1968 flu when between the two nearly 220,000 people died. NO SHUT DOWN and NO 7/24 media coverage also!
So did I... and Lawn Darts, and BB guns, and walking to and from school alone, riding my 5hp mini bike without a helmet, playing with sharp metal things, no car seats or seat belts and the list goes on and on, all without PANIC or SHUT DOWNS.

How the hell did we survive?
It schooled us and toughened us and liberal pajamakins want No part of that rigor
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646

Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country. In other words, you're cherry picking the stats to suit your narrative. If people wanted to do math, they could sit down and come up with these numbers. But with approaching 140K dead, 3.4 million infections and rising, and the resulting 11% unemployment and the inevitable second wave of shutdowns that are coming, who gives a shit? You're not telling the whole story. And you're ignoring what is being reported in the news every day. Hospitals in the south stretched to resource limits, lack of PPE, what this virus does to the body..even in people who don't have to be hospitalized, how easily it can be spread. The fact that children can carry it and infect their parents, grandparents and teacher...without them even knowing it.

I've zero idea for what is to be gained by constantly spouting the same "See, See!!, only X number of people have died!!". You can sit here and put the word SURVIVE into as big a bold as you want. But you don't acknowledge the fact that a lot of these people will never be the same health wise. And I've yet to figure out what your motives are for doing this other than the vain hopes to bolster the re-election chances of You-Know-Who.
You're the one who's telling only part of the story, shit for brains. Despite more infections being reported, COVID deaths are way down. The 11% unemployment is a result of this insane shutdown. We have plenty of PPE. What the virus does to the body in 99% of cases is nothing.

The evidence shows that the odds of children becoming infected or passing it on to adults is almost zero.

You're a hysteria monger who wants to destroy this country economically so your senile pedophile can win an election.

NOW they're trying to tell us that they KNOW, for an absolute fact, that there are long-term effects and what they are. HOW?! It hasn't been around long enough for any long-term effects to show up. And right on cue, the useful idiots in the street are screeching about how EVERYONE who gets Covid-19 is going to have these effects and be permanently damaged for the rest of their lives.

I guess this is their new panic line to take the place of "It's an automatic death sentence!" since the death rates are dropping.

A lot of people will. A lot of people already have, including children. Doesn't matter if it hasn't been around long enough in your opinion. Not everyone will get long term damage. But a lot will. It's already being documented. All you have to do is read.
Sorry, but 99% of Americans have suffered no ill effects whatsoever.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646

Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country. In other words, you're cherry picking the stats to suit your narrative. If people wanted to do math, they could sit down and come up with these numbers. But with approaching 140K dead, 3.4 million infections and rising, and the resulting 11% unemployment and the inevitable second wave of shutdowns that are coming, who gives a shit? You're not telling the whole story. And you're ignoring what is being reported in the news every day. Hospitals in the south stretched to resource limits, lack of PPE, what this virus does to the body..even in people who don't have to be hospitalized, how easily it can be spread. The fact that children can carry it and infect their parents, grandparents and teacher...without them even knowing it.

I've zero idea for what is to be gained by constantly spouting the same "See, See!!, only X number of people have died!!". You can sit here and put the word SURVIVE into as big a bold as you want. But you don't acknowledge the fact that a lot of these people will never be the same health wise. And I've yet to figure out what your motives are for doing this other than the vain hopes to bolster the re-election chances of You-Know-Who.
You're the one who's telling only part of the story, shit for brains. Despite more infections being reported, COVID deaths are way down. The 11% unemployment is a result of this insane shutdown. We have plenty of PPE. What the virus does to the body in 99% of cases is nothing.

The evidence shows that the odds of children becoming infected or passing it on to adults is almost zero.

You're a hysteria monger who wants to destroy this country economically so your senile pedophile can win an election.

NOW they're trying to tell us that they KNOW, for an absolute fact, that there are long-term effects and what they are. HOW?! It hasn't been around long enough for any long-term effects to show up. And right on cue, the useful idiots in the street are screeching about how EVERYONE who gets Covid-19 is going to have these effects and be permanently damaged for the rest of their lives.

I guess this is their new panic line to take the place of "It's an automatic death sentence!" since the death rates are dropping.

A lot of people will. A lot of people already have, including children. Doesn't matter if it hasn't been around long enough in your opinion. Not everyone will get long term damage. But a lot will. It's already being documented. All you have to do is read.
Sorry, but 99% of Americans have suffered no ill effects whatsoever.

Says no data...anywhere...backed up by reputable scientific claims...but, if you say it's true...well then, it must be. :uhoh3:
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646

Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country. In other words, you're cherry picking the stats to suit your narrative. If people wanted to do math, they could sit down and come up with these numbers. But with approaching 140K dead, 3.4 million infections and rising, and the resulting 11% unemployment and the inevitable second wave of shutdowns that are coming, who gives a shit? You're not telling the whole story. And you're ignoring what is being reported in the news every day. Hospitals in the south stretched to resource limits, lack of PPE, what this virus does to the body..even in people who don't have to be hospitalized, how easily it can be spread. The fact that children can carry it and infect their parents, grandparents and teacher...without them even knowing it.

I've zero idea for what is to be gained by constantly spouting the same "See, See!!, only X number of people have died!!". You can sit here and put the word SURVIVE into as big a bold as you want. But you don't acknowledge the fact that a lot of these people will never be the same health wise. And I've yet to figure out what your motives are for doing this other than the vain hopes to bolster the re-election chances of You-Know-Who.
You're the one who's telling only part of the story, shit for brains. Despite more infections being reported, COVID deaths are way down. The 11% unemployment is a result of this insane shutdown. We have plenty of PPE. What the virus does to the body in 99% of cases is nothing.

The evidence shows that the odds of children becoming infected or passing it on to adults is almost zero.

You're a hysteria monger who wants to destroy this country economically so your senile pedophile can win an election.

NOW they're trying to tell us that they KNOW, for an absolute fact, that there are long-term effects and what they are. HOW?! It hasn't been around long enough for any long-term effects to show up. And right on cue, the useful idiots in the street are screeching about how EVERYONE who gets Covid-19 is going to have these effects and be permanently damaged for the rest of their lives.

I guess this is their new panic line to take the place of "It's an automatic death sentence!" since the death rates are dropping.

A lot of people will. A lot of people already have, including children. Doesn't matter if it hasn't been around long enough in your opinion. Not everyone will get long term damage. But a lot will. It's already being documented. All you have to do is read.
Sorry, but 99% of Americans have suffered no ill effects whatsoever.

Says no data...anywhere...backed up by reputable scientific claims...but, if you say it's true...well then, it must be. :uhoh3:
Says official CDC data, moron.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
NOT my statistics correct these people:Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,697 Cases and 615,350 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
I just copy them down.
View attachment 365695

View attachment 365694
I’m not arguing specifically the numbers, I’m arguing the interpretation of what “serious critical” means as being current vs cumulative.

It’s absolutely obvious that this tab is current ICU admissions.
Again... not my definitions. Seriously question these people....I'd be interested to see your results. Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,874 Cases and 615,354 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Yes, it is your definition. You decided the tab meant one thing when it clearly meant something different.

Show me where that website lists the definition for that tab, indicating whether it's current or cumulative.
Screen Shot 2020-07-21 at 1.28.22 PM.png
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
NOT my statistics correct these people:Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,697 Cases and 615,350 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
I just copy them down.
View attachment 365695

View attachment 365694
I’m not arguing specifically the numbers, I’m arguing the interpretation of what “serious critical” means as being current vs cumulative.

It’s absolutely obvious that this tab is current ICU admissions.
Again... not my definitions. Seriously question these people....I'd be interested to see your results. Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,874 Cases and 615,354 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Yes, it is your definition. You decided the tab meant one thing when it clearly meant something different.

Show me where that website lists the definition for that tab, indicating whether it's current or cumulative.
View attachment 365716
Funny that China doesn't show up in any of those charts with as many people as they have, and that is where it all started.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
NOT my statistics correct these people:Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,697 Cases and 615,350 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
I just copy them down.
View attachment 365695

View attachment 365694
I’m not arguing specifically the numbers, I’m arguing the interpretation of what “serious critical” means as being current vs cumulative.

It’s absolutely obvious that this tab is current ICU admissions.
Again... not my definitions. Seriously question these people....I'd be interested to see your results. Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,874 Cases and 615,354 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Yes, it is your definition. You decided the tab meant one thing when it clearly meant something different.

Show me where that website lists the definition for that tab, indicating whether it's current or cumulative.
View attachment 365716
This diagram should be enough to know that it is "current" and no cumulative. For gods sake, the number actually goes down at times indicating that it's not a cumulative total.

Use some logic.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646

Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country. In other words, you're cherry picking the stats to suit your narrative. If people wanted to do math, they could sit down and come up with these numbers. But with approaching 140K dead, 3.4 million infections and rising, and the resulting 11% unemployment and the inevitable second wave of shutdowns that are coming, who gives a shit? You're not telling the whole story. And you're ignoring what is being reported in the news every day. Hospitals in the south stretched to resource limits, lack of PPE, what this virus does to the body..even in people who don't have to be hospitalized, how easily it can be spread. The fact that children can carry it and infect their parents, grandparents and teacher...without them even knowing it.

I've zero idea for what is to be gained by constantly spouting the same "See, See!!, only X number of people have died!!". You can sit here and put the word SURVIVE into as big a bold as you want. But you don't acknowledge the fact that a lot of these people will never be the same health wise. And I've yet to figure out what your motives are for doing this other than the vain hopes to bolster the re-election chances of You-Know-Who.
Quite simply, you're trying to make generalizations and apply them to the country.

Generalizations?

They are very specific numbers taken from national reporting, you raving lunatic.

Sorry not enough people are dying for you to make political points off of.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
How do you explain our death rate dropping 30% over the past month, and you clowns whining and crying that we need to shut the country down again?
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
How do you explain our death rate dropping 30% over the past month, and you clowns whining and crying that we need to shut the country down again?
Because infection rate decreased the month before that.

Deaths always lag infections.
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
NOT my statistics correct these people:Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,697 Cases and 615,350 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
I just copy them down.
View attachment 365695

View attachment 365694
I’m not arguing specifically the numbers, I’m arguing the interpretation of what “serious critical” means as being current vs cumulative.

It’s absolutely obvious that this tab is current ICU admissions.
Again... not my definitions. Seriously question these people....I'd be interested to see your results. Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,938,874 Cases and 615,354 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Yes, it is your definition. You decided the tab meant one thing when it clearly meant something different.

Show me where that website lists the definition for that tab, indicating whether it's current or cumulative.
View attachment 365716
Funny that China doesn't show up in any of those charts with as many people as they have, and that is where it all started.


China must be one of those countries Dragonlady said "eliminated the virus".
 
In the USA...
  • nearly 15% of the 331 million Americans have been tested.
  • Of the nearly 50 million tested, 8% were positive.
  • Of the nearly 4 million positive case, less than 0.034% required hospitalization.
  • Of those that were hospitalized, 0.29% died.
  • 96.369% of the 3,962,380 cases SURVIVE!
The below compilation is done by me from this web site: Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,889,872 Cases and 614,124 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
View attachment 365646
Not sure how you are arriving at the .034 and .29% figures. Those do not appear to match the data.
The math being done here is very sloppy.

After looking over the numbers for a few minutes, my initial impression is that this poster is that they're confusing current and cumulative data points, specifically in the number of admissions to ICU. Most of their numbers are cumulative, but I think they're only using current ICU admissions instead (instead of cumulative ICU admissions). They're also lumping "mild cases" as any hospitalized case that is not currently in the ICU as "not hospitalized" on occasion,.

Very sloppy and basically pointless work.

But MORE substantiation than YOUR GUESSES!!! You offer NO proof! No data...just subjective, uninformed opinion!

Here go to this link and verify the below...supposedly "sloppiness"!!! Coronavirus Update (Live): 14,925,196 Cases and 615,046 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer
Pretty damn clear when you go to the above LINK!
The headings are: "TOTAL CASES" TOTAL DEATHS... TOTAL RECOVERED... SERIOUS CRITICAL... Pretty specific "CUMULATIVE numbers..Dummy!
So please be a little more judicious in any criticism when you haven't proven yourself in the first place!
View attachment 365678
View attachment 365679
The SERIOUS CRITICAL gives no indication that is at all cumulative. There are also headlines sprinkled in which are CLEARLY not cumulative, such as new deaths, new caes, active cases etc.

You'd have to believe that there have only been 16k ICU cases of COVID out of 140k deaths, which makes zero sense. No, that tab clearly demonstrates that it is current ICU cases. Your math shows some fundamental problems.
How do you explain our death rate dropping 30% over the past month, and you clowns whining and crying that we need to shut the country down again?
Because infection rate decreased the month before that.

Deaths always lag infections.
Really? It dipped 30%?

Gotta link?
 
I still can't get over the idea you're supposed to wear a piece of cloth over your face, not because it's going to protect you from other people, but because it's going to protect other people from you. It's not supposed to stop you from breathing in particles, but stop you from breathing out particles. Apparently, the particles can only travel one direction in this scenario. How in the world does that make sense? And of course, people in their car with a mask on. Its simply mind boggling.
1595358683322.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top