Some truly unfortunate raw stats on police violence

[JoeB131]

Forensics proved that Brown didn't have his hands up. Forensics prove Brown was charging. Forensics prove that Joey B is lying out his ass once again.

Guy, you act like forensics really works the way CSI says it does...

 

[Brain357]

Forensics proved that Brown didn't have his hands up. Forensics prove Brown was charging. Forensics prove that Joey B is lying out his ass once again.

Guy, you act like forensics really works the way CSI says it does...

Nobody is buying what you are selling joe. There are real incidents where cops do wrong, stick to those. Cop was cleared in this one for good reason.

 

[bucs90]

Forensics proved that Brown didn't have his hands up. Forensics prove Brown was charging. Forensics prove that Joey B is lying out his ass once again.

Guy, you act like forensics really works the way CSI says it does...

This isnt CSI. Senior students at University of Tennessees forensics program could've figured this one out.

Browns blood was in the car and on Wilson's uniform. Browns DNA was ON THE GUN. Gun powder was on Browns hand. Bullet holes were in the front...not the back. They trailed bottom to head....indicating Brown was lunging towards Wilson as he was shot.

This is such a clear case it's ridiculous they burned a city over it.

 

[JoeB131]

Nobody is buying what you are selling joe. There are real incidents where cops do wrong, stick to those. Cop was cleared in this one for good reason.

Because the crazy lady was allowed to testify or because they let the cop make a self-serving statement without challenge.

You know, those guys who used to lynch blacks in the 1950's were "cleared" too.

No one buys it then. No one buys it now.

 

[JoeB131]

This isnt CSI. Senior students at University of Tennessees forensics program could've figured this one out.

Browns blood was in the car and on Wilson's uniform. Browns DNA was ON THE GUN. Gun powder was on Browns hand. Bullet holes were in the front...not the back. They trailed bottom to head....indicating Brown was lunging towards Wilson as he was shot.

Or that the first shots brought him to his knees and shithead just kept firing away.

Again, don't believe anything these people say, got caught lying too many times.

 

[bucs90]

Nobody is buying what you are selling joe. There are real incidents where cops do wrong, stick to those. Cop was cleared in this one for good reason.

Because the crazy lady was allowed to testify or because they let the cop make a self-serving statement without challenge.

You know, those guys who used to lynch blacks in the 1950's were "cleared" too.

No one buys it then. No one buys it now.

You know why cops shoot people who go for their guns?

Corinth officer's gun used to shoot him in chest and shoulder

Nobody is buying what you are selling joe. There are real incidents where cops do wrong, stick to those. Cop was cleared in this one for good reason.

Because the crazy lady was allowed to testify or because they let the cop make a self-serving statement without challenge.

You know, those guys who used to lynch blacks in the 1950's were "cleared" too.

No one buys it then. No one buys it now.

Corinth officer's gun used to shoot him in chest and shoulder

Know why cops shoot people who go for their guns? ^^^^link. Because when thugs get their guns....COP GETS SHOT. So....you aren't getting the gun. Even if you have to be shot.

 

[bucs90]

This isnt CSI. Senior students at University of Tennessees forensics program could've figured this one out.

Browns blood was in the car and on Wilson's uniform. Browns DNA was ON THE GUN. Gun powder was on Browns hand. Bullet holes were in the front...not the back. They trailed bottom to head....indicating Brown was lunging towards Wilson as he was shot.

Or that the first shots brought him to his knees and shithead just kept firing away.

Again, don't believe anything these people say, got caught lying too many times.

Which lies?

 

[Meathead]

Nobody is buying what you are selling joe. There are real incidents where cops do wrong, stick to those. Cop was cleared in this one for good reason.

Because the crazy lady was allowed to testify or because they let the cop make a self-serving statement without challenge.

You know, those guys who used to lynch blacks in the 1950's were "cleared" too.

No one buys it then. No one buys it now.

You need to struggle with the raging battle in your mind before you can take on issues like this Joey.

 

[bucs90]

Corinth officer's gun used to shoot him in chest and shoulder

Thug goes for cops gun while he's in car. Almost identical to Darren Wilson case. Except...unlike Mike Brown....this thug got the gun. And shot the cop twice in the chest.

And thats why Wilson shot Brown. So Brown wouldn't get the gun....and shoot him in the chest.

2 men....fighting for 1 gun. Loser....loses. You libs watch Hollywood movies. Didn't you know that?

 

[Papageorgio]

Forensics proved that Brown didn't have his hands up. Forensics prove Brown was charging. Forensics prove that Joey B is lying out his ass once again.

Guy, you act like forensics really works the way CSI says it does...

You act like you were there and you weren't, you just spit out lies.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

A bunch of witnesses said he did have his hands up.

Frankly, a TRIAL would have been a great place to sort out the facts. But you had a prosecutor who hid any facts that incriminated the officer.

Link!

Here you go buddy..

Missouri AG confirms Michael Brown grand jury misled by St. Louis DA

Subsequent to a previous report from Lawrence O'Donnell, the Missouri Attorney General has confirmed with "Last Word" that instructions given the Michael Brown grand jury describing the police "use of force" laws was incorrect and misleading.

The background of this situation: Lawrence O'Donnell reported that after reviewing the transcripts of the grand jury, his analyst discovered that the assistant district attorneys working for Bob McCulloch gave the jurors an outdated copy of Missouri law, which stated all that was required for an officer to use deadly force is their "reasonable belief" that there was a threat.

In 1985, in Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court ruled that this law had to include a "probable cause" requirement. The jurors weren't informed of this until three months later, just before their deliberations. Even at that time the difference and relevance of this was not explained to them clearly.

and there's more!

http://www.newsweek.com/2014/09/12/...llochs-long-history-siding-police-267357.html

You failed to show any facts that were "hidden" by the prosecutor.

The jury WAS informed of the requirement before deliberating.

 

[JoeB131]

Know why cops shoot people who go for their guns? ^^^^link. Because when thugs get their guns....COP GETS SHOT. So....you aren't getting the gun. Even if you have to be shot.

The moment he was shot, he was 100 feet away from Officer Fife and his cruiser.

So, no, the argument doesn't fly.

That McCoullagh had to misrepresent what the law is to the GJ tells me he knows the guy was in the wrong, he just didn't care.

 

[JoeB131]

You failed to show any facts that were "hidden" by the prosecutor.

The jury WAS informed of the requirement before deliberating.

They should have been informed BEFORE testimony started...

Then there was the crazy lady he let testify even though the FBI said she was nowhere near the shooting.

 

[bucs90]

Know why cops shoot people who go for their guns? ^^^^link. Because when thugs get their guns....COP GETS SHOT. So....you aren't getting the gun. Even if you have to be shot.

The moment he was shot, he was 100 feet away from Officer Fife and his cruiser.

So, no, the argument doesn't fly.

That McCoullagh had to misrepresent what the law is to the GJ tells me he knows the guy was in the wrong, he just didn't care.

The first time Brown was shot...his hand was on Wilson's gun. Inside the care. Browns DNA WAS found in the car...and on the gun.

So no...he wasn't 100 feet away when he was first shot...while fighting to take the cops gun.

The final shots were when his fat ass was running back for round 2.

Is that really that hard for you to grasp?

 

[bucs90]

The jury was given all the evidence. As fair as it gets.

 

[JoeB131]

[

The first time Brown was shot...his hand was on Wilson's gun. Inside the care. Browns DNA WAS found in the car...and on the gun.

So no...he wasn't 100 feet away when he was first shot...while fighting to take the cops gun.

The final shots were when his fat ass was running back for round 2.

Is that really that hard for you to grasp?

Go back and read what I said. At the point where Wilson MURDERED this kid, he was 100 feet away and no immediate threat. Also had his arms up saying "Don't shoot".

The jury was given all the evidence. As fair as it gets.

No, they weren't. They were told anincorrect interpretation of the law, and they let a crazy woman testify who the FBI had already determined was not on the scene. The Grand Jury was a farce.

That's why people are still on the street a year later.