HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
Bachmann's "reasoning'?
Oxymoron.
Oxymoron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you show me how eliminating the number of jobs it would take to reduce the federal government by 40%,
which is the percent of the budget we're borrowing,
would lead to a net increase in the number of jobs in this country, by all means do so.
Be specific and talk in factual terms about real tangible things, PLEASE.
Otherwise shut up.
No YOU shut up. Please.
If you eliminate 40% of the taxes needed to feed a growing and bloated bureaucracy, stop increasing the deficit, and start paying down the debt, our AAA credit rating is restored and both foreign and domestic markets will stabilize. Consumer confidence is restored.
Then give the job producers assurance that their tax burden is maneagable for the next five to ten years, and remove the most unnecessary and onerous regulation for the next five to ten years, and they will put the estimated 3 to 6 trillion in investment capital they are sitting on back into the economy and put people back to work.
That's how it is done.
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
No YOU shut up. Please.
If you eliminate 40% of the taxes needed to feed a growing and bloated bureaucracy, stop increasing the deficit, and start paying down the debt, our AAA credit rating is restored and both foreign and domestic markets will stabilize. Consumer confidence is restored.
Then give the job producers assurance that their tax burden is maneagable for the next five to ten years, and remove the most unnecessary and onerous regulation for the next five to ten years, and they will put the estimated 3 to 6 trillion in investment capital they are sitting on back into the economy and put people back to work.
That's how it is done.
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
I'm not enrolled so I have no syllabus; let us know how taxes impact supply and demand. Is that a hypothesis, a theory or a law (or do those terms only apply to hard science)?
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
I'm not enrolled so I have no syllabus; let us know how taxes impact supply and demand. Is that a hypothesis, a theory or a law (or do those terms only apply to hard science)?
Save the store bought talking points, I'm as anti-republican as i am anti-democrat. I find evolution deniers on the republican side ridiculous, just like i find you economics deniers on the democrat side ridiculous.
Tax incidence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scroll down to the charts, the word you'll consistently see is burden.
No YOU shut up. Please.
If you eliminate 40% of the taxes needed to feed a growing and bloated bureaucracy, stop increasing the deficit, and start paying down the debt, our AAA credit rating is restored and both foreign and domestic markets will stabilize. Consumer confidence is restored.
Then give the job producers assurance that their tax burden is maneagable for the next five to ten years, and remove the most unnecessary and onerous regulation for the next five to ten years, and they will put the estimated 3 to 6 trillion in investment capital they are sitting on back into the economy and put people back to work.
That's how it is done.
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
You idiots who think shrinking the size of government is not a job killer, tell me this.
The US Post Office needs to get rid of about 100,000 employees to get itself financially straight.
How does that create jobs? First, how does it create jobs for the 100,000 laid off postal workers? Then, where does the net increase in jobs come from?
Prove that you're not idiots.
Deregulation.
Rewriting the Tax Structure Laws.
Limiting Government Overhead.
We are too top heave NYCarb. You are too caught up in your game of Musical Chairs to notice the effect you have on the rest of us. You have been riding high for too long.
Looks like (once again) debate is ended because my opponents have cut and run.
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
We were talking about cutting government spending by 40%, Schoolboy. Learn to read.
Bachmann attacked President Obama's speech yesterday and in part she proposed to massively cut government and to repeal job killing regulations.
If the cost of government is largely the cost of salary and benefits, then cutting government means cutting jobs.
Cutting jobs increases unemployment, so, I conclude, cutting government is a "job killing" proposition.
In my thought process, these government employees have bills to pay, children to raise and whether they are productive in the eyes of some or not, they still pay taxes. In addition they buy things: pizzas and pies, shoes and socks, books and bagels.
How will increasing the unemployment numbers stimulate our economy?
Looks like (once again) debate is ended because my opponents have cut and run.
Looks like (once again) debate is ended because my opponents have cut and run.
I would like for someone to explain the support obama is getting?
I would like for someone to explain the support obama is getting?
That's retarded. Seriously. You put millions of people out of work if you cut back government by 40%, all that buying power and demand disappears, you already have 9% unemployment in a jobless recovery,
and you think that magically businesses are going to ramp up production enough to hire millions??
Use your fucking head.
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
I'm not enrolled so I have no syllabus; let us know how taxes impact supply and demand. Is that a hypothesis, a theory or a law (or do those terms only apply to hard science)?
That's not really magic, that's economics 101, I would advise you sign up for that class at your nearest community college.
On day 1 after you get your syllabus, you'll learn how taxes impact supply and demand in a capitalistic economy.
I'm not enrolled so I have no syllabus; let us know how taxes impact supply and demand. Is that a hypothesis, a theory or a law (or do those terms only apply to hard science)?
Taxes affect supply and demand in two ways.
Increased costs of things people have to have often result in less buying of things they don't have to have.
Increased taxes on a product they don't have to have will reduce at least some demand from consumers. If the supplier lowers base cost to offset the tax to keep consumers interested, that will lower the supplier's profit which may or may not affect the supply but it certainly affects the overall robustness of the economy. One way it usually affects most supply is that imported products too often then look better than our own. Excessive taxes, artificially inflated wages, and over regulation continues to drive our manufacturing base overseas. And nobody seems interested in correcting that.
An illustration is the legislation in which George H.W. Bush broke his 'no new taxes' pledge and allowed a tax on the 'rich' to be applied to private planes, boats, jewelry luxury cars, other high ticket items. (He was supposed to get $3 in spending cuts for every dollar in new taxes, but as these things go, that never materialized. Congress will raise the taxes but they won't cut spending.)
Anyway the onerous new taxes decimated our private industries when the 'rich' simply went elsewhere for more consumer friendly climes to buy their toys. More than 50,000 employees were laid off in the boat and plane building industries that have not fully recovered yet, and our profitable jewelry industry was driven off shore where it now remains in places like Grand Cayman. The duties to bring it into the country were less than the tax applied when it was bought here.