Someone wants to use the 14th Amendment to fix the 2024 election for Dems.

[martybegan]

Trump disqualified himself. If he had accepted defeat without the shenanigans he would not be going through this.

No he didn't.

Fixed that sandwich for Biden yet?

 

[Faun]

1. The FBI falsified evidence to get a FISA warrant against the Trump campaign. That is a fact.
2. The FBI colluded and paid Twitter to censor the Biden laptop story in support of Blinken's "Russian Disinformation" memo.
"For the past few weeks, journalists have been reporting on what they've found in the "Twitter Files"—thousands and thousands of documents they were given access to by Twitter's new owner and CEO, the billionaire Elon Musk. The revelations have been astonishing and deeply troubling, exposing solid evidence of collusion between top executives at the FBI and their cozy counterparts at Twitter."
3. That the FBI infiltrated the militias confirms that they were a party to the planning, aka "instigating". Otherwise they would have shut down J6 before it happened.

The FBI had anti-Trump Operations Razor & Crossfire-Hurricane. The FBI is weaponized and politicized, like a Waffen SS.

That the FBI infiltrated the militias confirms that they were a party to the planning, aka "instigating". Otherwise they would have shut down J6 before it happened.

You don't read your own links, do ya?

An FBI informant who marched to the US Capitol with fellow Proud Boys on January 6 testified on Wednesday that he did not know of any plans for the far-right extremist group to invade the building and didn’t think they inspired violence that day.​

​

[...]​

​

The informant said he contacted the agent because he saw it as an “emergency situation”. He testified that the FBI didn’t ask him to go to Washington or march with the Proud Boys that day.​

 

[BlindBoo]

So are they insurrectionists now too?

For their failed legal challenge to several other states that did what Texas did during the pandemic? No. Not an insurrection. Stupid? Yes! But they are Republicans so it is taken for granted.

 

[martybegan]

For their failed legal challenge to several other states that did what Texas did during the pandemic? No. Not an insurrection. Stupid? Yes! But they are Republicans so it is taken for granted.

Dems can't define what a woman is, I guess that makes them smart, right?

 

[Faun]

It had a specific purpose, and your ilk are trying to bastardize it to get your one party state wet dream.

Yeah, it's specific purpose was to keep people who revolt, or support a revolt, against the country, after taking an oath to defend the Constitution, out of returning to office. At that time, it was about Confederates. It still applies to anyone who holds, or held, a public office defined in the 14th Amendment.

 

[Marener]

LOL, how many cases have been thrown out because harm hasn't been established yet, or harm not shown to directly impact someone? Before the election, denied on standing, after the election denied on standing. Nice racket they got there.

Tons of cases were adjudicated before the election. The problem is that Trump's lawsuits didn't incorporate voters in the state.

You don't know what you're talking about.

You gave up trying to claim you were looking for voter fraud at least. You just admit that you couldn't so you took the easy route of just trashing EVERYONE's vote. You asked the courts to give the election to Trump without even showing any fraud occurred.

Sounds like a court mandated coup.

 

[Faun]

They can't up and decide to ban on candidate, they can only set very very limited qualifications.

There are no other Constitutional restrictions.

Of course they can. In cases of an impeachment resulting in a conviction, or in the case of a president (among other positions) who rebels against the country or offers aid or comfort to those who did.

 

[Faun]

Have you ever heard of "Innocent until PROVEN GUILTY"? That means that you don't punish someone who has not been convicted.

Convicted of what?

 

[Faun]

Nope.

Back into the kitchen of your Dem massa's house, boy.

That's for the states to decide, not you.

 

[BlindBoo]

Dems can't define what a woman is, I guess that makes them smart, right?

You've worn that dress out, time for a new one.

 

[martybegan]

Tons of cases were adjudicated before the election. The problem is that Trump's lawsuits didn't incorporate voters in the state.

You don't know what you're talking about.

You gave up trying to claim you were looking for voter fraud at least. You just admit that you couldn't so you took the easy route of just trashing EVERYONE's vote. You asked the courts to give the election to Trump without even showing any fraud occurred.

Sounds like a court mandated coup.

Looking for things that caused fraud, looking for fraud. Same shit, different day.

I didn't ask for shit, just pointing out your continuing denial of anything that would impact your Dem dick sucking world view.

Slurp Slurp Slurp.

 

[martybegan]

Of course they can. In cases of an impeachment resulting in a conviction, or in the case of a president (among other positions) who rebels against the country or offers aid or comfort to those who did.

No, they can't. Impeachment removes the person from office. It doesn't prevent the voters from sending them back. Even criminal convictions can't do that.

Ask Marion Barry.

 

[martybegan]

That's for the states to decide, not you.

Nope.

Now go and pretend to care about law and process somewhere else, hack-twat.

 

[martybegan]

You've worn that dress out, time for a new one.

And yet it keeps working, because your side keeps putting up with it from your crazies.

Or you actually believe in it, which in that case, LOL.

 

[Marener]

Looking for things that caused fraud, looking for fraud. Same shit, different day.

I didn't ask for shit, just pointing out your continuing denial of anything that would impact your Dem dick sucking world view.

Slurp Slurp Slurp.

That's not the same thing at all. It's definitely not a reason to take away tens of millions of votes and have a couple of judges reverse the entire election without even proving a single fraudulent vote.

That's so much worse than asking courts to apply the 14th amendment before the election.

 

[martybegan]

That's not the same thing at all. It's definitely not a reason to take away tens of millions of votes and have a couple of judges reverse the entire election without even proving a single fraudulent vote.

That's so much worse than asking courts to apply the 14th amendment before the election.

If the courts wouldn't stop it before, then hell yes it is. Rules are rules.

 

[BlindBoo]

And yet it keeps working, because your side keeps putting up with it from your crazies.

Or you actually believe in it, which in that case, LOL.

Frankly I don't know anyone who says that a biological male has a baby factory. That Lola's exists is just a given.

 

[martybegan]

Frankly I don't know anyone who says that a biological male has a baby factory. That Lola's exists is just a given.

Dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge.

We see examples of someone demanding to be treated like the sex they are cosplaying every day.

 

[kaz]

Frankly I don't know anyone who says that a biological male has a baby factory. That Lola's exists is just a given.

Boy are you wrong. Problem with Democrats is you are incapable of learning. Here it is, I realize your lie will make no difference to you

 

[Marener]

If the courts wouldn't stop it before, then hell yes it is. Rules are rules.

The courts would stop if before if you had filed a proper lawsuit with a compelling argument. Not my fault Trump's legal team has their head up their asses.

The election happened and you corrupt assholes tried to trash tens of millions of votes based on your feelings and not facts.