Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2009
- 51,322
- 6,470
Bernie needs to run a genuine 3rd Party Socialist campaign and give Progressive a real choice
One more example ^^^ of a lack of sagacious thought + an effort to raise the RED SCARE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bernie needs to run a genuine 3rd Party Socialist campaign and give Progressive a real choice
Bernie needs to run a genuine 3rd Party Socialist campaign and give Progressive a real choice
One more example ^^^ of a lack of sagacious thought + an effort to raise the RED SCARE.
Maybe a moderator can answer a question, why did this thread get thumb tacked to the top of the board?
Bernie needs to run a genuine 3rd Party Socialist campaign and give Progressive a real choice
One more example ^^^ of a lack of sagacious thought + an effort to raise the RED SCARE.
It's 2016 Prog, it's time to openly embrace your Inner Mao
Maybe a moderator can answer a question, why did this thread get thumb tacked to the top of the board?
I suppose because the General Election is now only Nine Months ahead, and there is considerable interest in who will be nominated by each of the two major parties.
That said, I wonder who the Libertarian Party will nominate as their Standard Bearers. Will one of the R Party losers leave to run as a 3rd Party Candidate? Might Sen. Sanders jumped to the Green Party? Remember the chaos Perot and Nader created in the past, we do live in interesting times.
Bernie needs to run a genuine 3rd Party Socialist campaign and give Progressive a real choice
One more example ^^^ of a lack of sagacious thought + an effort to raise the RED SCARE.
It's 2016 Prog, it's time to openly embrace your Inner Mao
Once I recall a post by you substantive and both thoughtful and thought provoking.
No, they couldn't have been you, I must be mistaken.
A very encouraging sign...twice as many republicans came out to vote for their candidates as did democrats. We could call that the enthusiasm gap. Bodes well for November.
South Carolina Primary Election Results
That would be interesting if S. Carolina had equal, or close to it, numbers in both parties. In the General, it will be very interesting to see how the vote in such a red state is cast. Will the wedge issues once again decide, or will economics and the realpolitik begin to change the hue of S. Carolina and other Red States?
Maybe a moderator can answer a question, why did this thread get thumb tacked to the top of the board?
I suppose because the General Election is now only Nine Months ahead, and there is considerable interest in who will be nominated by each of the two major parties.
That said, I wonder who the Libertarian Party will nominate as their Standard Bearers. Will one of the R Party losers leave to run as a 3rd Party Candidate? Might Sen. Sanders jumped to the Green Party? Remember the chaos Perot and Nader created in the past, we do live in interesting times.
I don't think Perot caused much chaos, it was actually good, in my opinion, to have another option. Unfortunately we ended up with Clinton but we might have any way. Sanders running on the Green ticket or third party might take votes away from both sides. I really don't think Mrs. Bosnia Clinton is as popular as this one state's results suggest.
There has been more then one primary, it just seem interesting that the one primary that Mrs. Bosnia Clinton wins by a landslide stays on top. Me thinks it has more to do with bias.
Everyone who has a problem with a pro-white platform is by definition a racist.Trump is the most pro-white candidate that has run for president since Buchanan.that's really funny given that you morons are going to run trump.
![]()
that's right, he's a bigot who is loved by bigots.
which is why he's going to lose.
idiots.
Thanks for showing your true colors retard.
no, nut bar... anyone who has a problem with white supremacist scum is far more decent than you.
funny how the internet makes pond scum like you stick their heads out. usually losers like you at least had to walk outside and put on a hood.
![]()
We should shun racists.
Why Hillary Clinton’s ‘super-predator’ concession is such a big moment for political protest
Maybe a moderator can answer a question, why did this thread get thumb tacked to the top of the board?
I suppose because the General Election is now only Nine Months ahead, and there is considerable interest in who will be nominated by each of the two major parties.
That said, I wonder who the Libertarian Party will nominate as their Standard Bearers. Will one of the R Party losers leave to run as a 3rd Party Candidate? Might Sen. Sanders jumped to the Green Party? Remember the chaos Perot and Nader created in the past, we do live in interesting times.
I don't think Perot caused much chaos, it was actually good, in my opinion, to have another option. Unfortunately we ended up with Clinton but we might have any way. Sanders running on the Green ticket or third party might take votes away from both sides. I really don't think Mrs. Bosnia Clinton is as popular as this one state's results suggest.
There has been more then one primary, it just seem interesting that the one primary that Mrs. Bosnia Clinton wins by a landslide stays on top. Me thinks it has more to do with bias.
"Mrs. Bosnia Clinton"? Why post HRC in this manner? Do you think it's clever or significant of an historical fact? If so why?
I for one didn't find the vote in Iowa or NH particularly enlightening. I'd much prefer a diverse demographic of states open the battle for the nomination, and that they be included in a Super Tuesday; with the first vote being taken no sooner than Feb. 15th of the year of the General Election.
Limiting debates didn't make the Republican Party look any less ridiculous than they did in 2012 or 2008.
Everyone who has a problem with a pro-white platform is by definition a racist.Trump is the most pro-white candidate that has run for president since Buchanan.
that's right, he's a bigot who is loved by bigots.
which is why he's going to lose.
idiots.
Thanks for showing your true colors retard.
no, nut bar... anyone who has a problem with white supremacist scum is far more decent than you.
funny how the internet makes pond scum like you stick their heads out. usually losers like you at least had to walk outside and put on a hood.
![]()
We should shun racists.
Why Hillary Clinton’s ‘super-predator’ concession is such a big moment for political protest
which is why we shun white trash like you
Everyone who has a problem with a pro-white platform is by definition a racist.that's right, he's a bigot who is loved by bigots.
which is why he's going to lose.
idiots.
Thanks for showing your true colors retard.
no, nut bar... anyone who has a problem with white supremacist scum is far more decent than you.
funny how the internet makes pond scum like you stick their heads out. usually losers like you at least had to walk outside and put on a hood.
![]()
We should shun racists.
Why Hillary Clinton’s ‘super-predator’ concession is such a big moment for political protest
which is why we shun white trash like you
Racist
so is Moe.....The House and Senate are afraid of Hillary. They should be...
Maybe a moderator can answer a question, why did this thread get thumb tacked to the top of the board?
I suppose because the General Election is now only Nine Months ahead, and there is considerable interest in who will be nominated by each of the two major parties.
That said, I wonder who the Libertarian Party will nominate as their Standard Bearers. Will one of the R Party losers leave to run as a 3rd Party Candidate? Might Sen. Sanders jumped to the Green Party? Remember the chaos Perot and Nader created in the past, we do live in interesting times.
I don't think Perot caused much chaos, it was actually good, in my opinion, to have another option. Unfortunately we ended up with Clinton but we might have any way. Sanders running on the Green ticket or third party might take votes away from both sides. I really don't think Mrs. Bosnia Clinton is as popular as this one state's results suggest.
There has been more then one primary, it just seem interesting that the one primary that Mrs. Bosnia Clinton wins by a landslide stays on top. Me thinks it has more to do with bias.
"Mrs. Bosnia Clinton"? Why post HRC in this manner? Do you think it's clever or significant of an historical fact? If so why?
I for one didn't find the vote in Iowa or NH particularly enlightening. I'd much prefer a diverse demographic of states open the battle for the nomination, and that they be included in a Super Tuesday; with the first vote being taken no sooner than Feb. 15th of the year of the General Election.
Limiting debates didn't make the Republican Party look any less ridiculous than they did in 2012 or 2008.
Seems Freewill has cut and run. Can anyone guess why he referred to her as Mrs. Bosnia? I suppose we might call Mrs. George W. Bush Mrs. Iraq, if we were mean spirited. Of course the Balkans didn't cost 4,500 + lives of American troops as did the fiasco in Iraq.
And today, the Balkans have peace, unlike the ME which is at best chaotic.
See for the Balkins:
Details: January 2016 Journey to the Balkans | Sisterhood of Salaam Shalom | Enriching Women's Souls, Shattering Stereotypes
For Iraq and the ME, see the local and national news.