St louis DA's Office Caught Altering Evidence Against McCloskeys

[daveman]

You sounds like you're willing to bet someone else's life on it.

Nah. I try to stay away from violent people.

As an example, the McCloskey’s are now claiming they own part of the common land in the subdivision, squatters rights. Not joke. There’s a lawsuit in progress because this couple is absolute garbage.

Apparently, according to their own court filings, they’ve pointed a gun at someone cutting across this contested land. That’s right. They threatened someone for walking on common area.

These people are trash. No one in their neighborhood wants them there.

Maybe you should go burn a cross in their front yard.

They smashed beehives that belonged to a Jewish school next door. The children were planning on harvesting the honey to enjoy on Rosh Hashanah.

I worry more about these assholes than anyone who they pointed guns at.

They are assholes.

But being assholes doesn't mean people have the right to break the law by trespassing on their property.

You do know that, right?

 

[colfax_m]

You sounds like you're willing to bet someone else's life on it.

Nah. I try to stay away from violent people.

As an example, the McCloskey’s are now claiming they own part of the common land in the subdivision, squatters rights. Not joke. There’s a lawsuit in progress because this couple is absolute garbage.

Apparently, according to their own court filings, they’ve pointed a gun at someone cutting across this contested land. That’s right. They threatened someone for walking on common area.

These people are trash. No one in their neighborhood wants them there.

Maybe you should go burn a cross in their front yard.

They smashed beehives that belonged to a Jewish school next door. The children were planning on harvesting the honey to enjoy on Rosh Hashanah.

I worry more about these assholes than anyone who they pointed guns at.

They are assholes.

But being assholes doesn't mean people have the right to break the law by trespassing on their property.

You do know that, right?

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

 

[daveman]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

 

[daveman]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

again in the state of missouri once they went through the gate entered private property and were told to leave the mccloskys were within their right to shoot them,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

thats been posted so look them up yourself,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

For walking on the sidewalk?

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

thats been posted so look them up yourself,,,

You reference it. You post it. Don’t be a lazy asshole.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

read the law and you will know why,,,

read the law and you will know why,,,

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

For walking on the sidewalk?

For entering through the gate to private property, the street in question is probably not city property it is probably the gated communities property.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

thats been posted so look them up yourself,,,

You reference it. You post it. Don’t be a lazy asshole.

for anyone else but you I would consider it,,,

you claimed they committed a crime so you should post the law they broke,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

For walking on the sidewalk?

For entering through the gate to private property, the street in question is probably not city property it is probably the gated communities property.

Was the street the property of the McCloskey’s? Was the gate the property of the McCloskey’s?

 

[colfax_m]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

thats been posted so look them up yourself,,,

You reference it. You post it. Don’t be a lazy asshole.

for anyone else but you I would consider it,,,

you claimed they committed a crime so you should post the law they broke,,,

Easy enough, especially since I’m not a lazy asshole.

McCloskeys charged with felonies for waving guns during protests

St. Louis prosecutors have charged a Central West End couple with a felony gun crime for their actions as protesters marched by their home.

www.stltoday.com

571.030

Unlawful use of weapons, offense of — exceptions — violation, penalties.

revisor.mo.gov

Your turn. Post the tweets.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

"Almost everyone".

You're dismissed.

You never answered the question.

Walking on the sidewalk is trespassing now? You’re not serious.

They entered read his post by law IN THAT STATE, per the AG of the State they had a right to fire on them, THUS a right to have arms present

For walking on the sidewalk?

For entering through the gate to private property, the street in question is probably not city property it is probably the gated communities property.

Was the street the property of the McCloskey’s? Was the gate the property of the McCloskey’s?

It does not matter but I assume they did in fact enter the property of the couple and yes a person has the right to defend communal property just like their own property. Be specific now and do as asked cite the law or laws that the couple broke and are charged with.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure. But what's "their property" is actually a bit in dispute. The McCloskey's think property belongs to them just because they say so.

If people are walking in the street, the McCloskey's have no right to threaten them with firearms.

Hmmm...

Almost everyone in that photo is in the street.

Serious question. Do the McCloskey’s have a right to point a gun at anyone walking on the sidewalk in front of their house.

in the state of missouri they are allowed to shoot them once they broke through the gate onto private property,,,

that comes from the state AG,,,check his twitter feeed and he lays it out in detail,,,

Post the tweets.

thats been posted so look them up yourself,,,

You reference it. You post it. Don’t be a lazy asshole.

for anyone else but you I would consider it,,,

you claimed they committed a crime so you should post the law they broke,,,

Easy enough, especially since I’m not a lazy asshole.

McCloskeys charged with felonies for waving guns during protests

St. Louis prosecutors have charged a Central West End couple with a felony gun crime for their actions as protesters marched by their home.

www.stltoday.com

571.030

Unlawful use of weapons, offense of — exceptions — violation, penalties.

revisor.mo.gov

Your turn. Post the tweets.

why didnt you post the castle law???

OH I know,, it would prove you wrong,,,