Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 57,289
- 42,313
Yep. If I leave my front door unlocked and you walk in without my consent, you've committed a crime1. What part of "there is no crime" don't you get? The DA wrongly filed charges against law-abiding homeowners. There will not be a trial, unless its for Kim Gardner.Whether they committed a crime is for the judge and jury to decide. Not the governor. He may pardon them but that doesn’t mean they’re law abiding.There won't be a jury trial for the McCloskys' but there will be one for Kim Gardner.The point is that in the State of MO homeowners do have the right to defend their "castle".They had someone come in and change a nonfunctional firearm to a functional one, in order to file the charge, dumbass...But they didn’t tamper with evidence. Everything that was done with the firearm was documented and submitted to the court. Therefore it could not be considered false or misleading.They need to go to jail and lose their license to practice law..
Universal Citation: MO Rev Stat § 575.100 (2013)
Tampering with physical evidence.
575.100. 1. A person commits the crime of tampering with physical evidence if he:
(1) Alters, destroys, suppresses or conceals any record, document or thing with purpose to impair its verity, legibility or availability in any official proceeding or investigation; or
(2) Makes, presents or uses any record, document or thing knowing it to be false with purpose to mislead a public servant who is or may be engaged in any official proceeding or investigation.
2. Tampering with physical evidence is a class D felony if the actor impairs or obstructs the prosecution or defense of a felony; otherwise, tampering with physical evidence is a class A misdemeanor.
(L. 1977 S.B. 60)
Effective 1-1-79
Which means they can also be sued for knowingly filing a bogus criminal charge...
It also brings in the possibility of a perjury charge if they said the firearm they picked up was functional in the criminal complaint!!!
The question is whether moving the spring is sufficient to count as readily functional. It’s a question for the court to decide.
The point is that all relevant facts are presented to the court so the idea that there’s some perjury here is stupid.
The felony charges brought by the crooked DA (Kim Gardner) against the McClosky's are illegal.
Kim Gardner now adds falsifying evidence to add to the other charges against her.
I hope the State AG files charges against Kim Gardner soon, and disbars her.
Whether they were defending their property or not remains to be seen. The judge and jury will decide. There’s nothing illegal about the charges, that’s absurd.
As I’ve already pointed out, the evidence was not falsified.
You guys aren’t actually thinking here, just following a narrative.
The governor and State AG already said that the McClosky's did not commit any crime, period.
![]()
Missouri Gov. Parson to pardon McCloskeys 'without a doubt,' saying prosecutor's actions 'defy common sense'
Missouri Gov. Mike Parson told "Hannity" on Monday that "without a doubt," he will pardon Mark and Patricia McCloskey, hours after St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner filed felony charges against them.www.foxnews.com
This is getting to be a pattern with right wing crime. Just claim the prosecution was politically motivated. Doesn’t matter what you did.
But back to the topic of the thread, no evidence was falsified. Y’all got that one wrong.
2. The gun doesn't matter if there was no crime. Generally speaking tampering with evidence is a crime.
3. We'll see who broke MO law.
1. Who the hell appointed you arbiter of what is and isn't a crime. Thanks for your opinion but don't go pretending it's any more than that.
2. There was no tampering with evidence, there was no crime.
3. Sure we will. If someone starts waving a gun around at people walking on the sidewalk in front of their house, that'd be a crime, wouldn't it?
Yes, unless they were walking up on your property through a forced open gate.
If by forced, you mean opened the gate and walked through it?
Not quite as scary as the defendants told us.
What else are they lying about?
What difference does that make you fucking idiot?
I have a gate on my property too. You just lift the lever and walk in. But if you do you will be met with a hail of bullets because I have no trespassing signs and "trespassers will be shot" signs all around my home. You don't have to tear down a gate to be trespassing. There doesn't have to even BE A FUCKING GATE to be trespassing. If you enter private property you are at the mercy of the property owner.
Hail be to the castle doctrine.