Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Supposedly you are not a Democrat. However your claim seems invalid. Why, due to posts like the above.Really stupid post. Really stupid.
Had a customer of yours defaulted and you found he was given the loan based on lies you would not sue?
Of course you would have.
No one would ever tell the truth if their were never any consequences. Your customers had to sign that the info they supplied you was honest.
You did not verify THEIR BOOKS. You used their swore statements to make your determination of their loan worthiness. A very differant thing.
What is with you people?
How can their be so many conspiracies all against the same person?
From every, dem or rep charged with dealing with facts.
Good God.
Get out of that cult.
It like a stupid pill they make you swallow daily.
And lied on every one. He kept 3 sets of books. This was established in court.Supposedly you are not a Democrat. However your claim seems invalid. Why, due to posts like the above.
I said we verified every facet on their applications. Yet you talk as if this is not true. We did not trust any of them. If you have a mortgage as old as you say you are, you were totally checked out. Trump filled out correct papers. And he complied with all of them.
Does the term Caveat Emptor" mean anything to you?
Banks who lend money know what collateral is worth.
No one lost money, there was no fraud, there was NEVER a $400,000,000 penalty when no one lost a dime.
Banks made $millions, walked away happy.
Letitia James ran on "getting Trump". This is a political hit job, aka "Lawfare".
1. Prove with links that any bank(s) lost hundreds of millions of dollars.Lying in financial documents for financial advantage to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars....is not fraud?
You've lost your damn fucking mind.
Maybe you want companies operating like that in YOUR state, but here in NY I want the justice system to do it's job and hold companies to account.
Enough above why Trump was guilty of fraud. You don't have to lose money. You have to lie, and that's what Trump did.1. Prove with links that any bank(s) lost hundreds of millions of dollars.
2. The banks swore in court that they all made money. There was no fraud.
3. Banks also testified that they make adjustments to client provided information. Its their job.
But, testifying for the defense, managing director David Williams said the bankers viewed clients’ reports of their net worth as “subjective or subject to estimates” and took its own view of such financial statements.Deutsche Bank MD testifies on Trump's inflated income statements: 'It’s not an industry standard that these statements be audited'
David Williams said bankers viewed net worth claims as “subjective or subject to estimates” and a multibillion-dollar adjustment wasn't necessarily unusual.fortune.com
“I think we expect clients-provided information to be accurate. At the same time, it’s not an industry standard that these statements be audited. They’re largely reliant on the use of estimates,” Williams said, so bankers routinely “make some adjustments.”
At times, the bank pegged Trump’s wealth at several billion dollars lower than he did, according to documents and testimony. In 2019, for example, Trump’s financial statement listed his net worth at $5.8 billion, which the bank adjusted down to $2.5 billion.
But Williams said such differences weren’t necessarily unusual or alarming.
Remember, this is kyzr. Fraud is in the attempt, not whether it was successful. A good trial, a fair outcome.Does the term Caveat Emptor" mean anything to you?
Banks who lend money know what collateral is worth.
No one lost money, there was no fraud, there was NEVER a $400,000,000 penalty when no one lost a dime.
Banks made $millions, walked away happy.
Letitia James ran on "getting Trump". This is a political hit job, aka "Lawfare".
Remember, this is kyzr. Fraud is in the attempt, not whether it was successful. A good trial, a fair outcome.
It does not matter if Trump had 100s of books. I told you, lenders do not trust borrowers at all. All we had available was government schemes allowed for us. We could not for instance tell your family or neighbors if you really lied about your income. But borrowers must sign forms telling us we get to have their tax returns. And we know about tax fraud so we have other ways to verify it to catch you lying. This Judge hates Trump. End of this story.And lied on every one. He kept 3 sets of books. This was established in court.
How do you dissuade others from fraud if you don't punish the kings of fraud?
Also, the judge made clear his fine was in no small part dictated by his lack of contrition.
This is common in sentencing.
So you are ok with Trump's fraud against the U.S. as well?
I mean the guy is already convicted of fraud in all his business dealings and is now unqualified to conduct business in the state of New York.....and yet you STILL think he's qualified to lead this nation?
FYI, you are in a cult.
IF you face a trial with the similar circumstances, you will yell the court is wrong. I guarantee you will.Remember, this is kyzr. Fraud is in the attempt, not whether it was successful. A good trial, a fair outcome.
I believe it’s one of the few things we have common ground on.
You think it’s money well spent to give lots of money to Trump. I also want you to send lots and lots of money to Trump.
The cult requires you to defend Biden.OF course he is. The cult requires it
There is me, another poster and perhaps others who actually understand this entire topic. And what happened to Trump is the fraud.Remember, this is kyzr. Fraud is in the attempt, not whether it was successful. A good trial, a fair outcome.
Does the relevant statute come into play with this in any way, poster kyzr?There was no fraud.
There are so many laws that are only in particular states, that when they get so important, the Supreme Court does look at them and declare them not to be legal. NY state prosecutes for what 49 states do not.Does the relevant statute come into play with this in any way, poster kyzr?
How does it apply? Or not apply?
Thanx in advance.
No. They won't. Again, this case won't see the light of day there.
He's gonna pay. One way or the other.
Does the relevant statute come into play with this in any way, poster kyzr?
How does it apply? Or not apply?
Thanx in advance.
He doesn't care. His supporters don't care.Where are they made?
Which, some fools with money to burn will do, times 1000. Or, what first world countries call, "money laundering".They are only worth that if someone is willing to pay that.
