"startling new details"

[Dot Com]

There are republican gays also, deen.....and also, there are liberal republicans.
I hate to burst your partisan wingnut bubble...but.....

There are no liberal Republicans and Republicans hate gays. There are black Republicans and Republicans hate blacks. There are always a few masochists among us.

Sorry dearest troll. There are indeed liberal Republicans.

I understand how much you need it to be true that Republicans are as full of hate as you say, but some of the most hateful things I've heard said about blacks in modern times have come from the left.

liberal republicans? All two of them? You people have done your best to purge your party of them.

OH!!! and thanks for getting tinyd wound-up again by starting this thread

 

[Erand7899]

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

President Bush and his administration didn't blame any of the violence on a stupid video.

Nope, he blamed it on phantom WMD

is that better ???

Is one lie better than another? Which attack did Bush blame on WMDs?

 

[Meister]

There are no liberal Republicans and Republicans hate gays. There are black Republicans and Republicans hate blacks. There are always a few masochists among us.

Sorry dearest troll. There are indeed liberal Republicans.

I understand how much you need it to be true that Republicans are as full of hate as you say, but some of the most hateful things I've heard said about blacks in modern times have come from the left.

liberal republicans? All two of them? You people have done your best to purge your party of them.

OH!!! and thanks for getting tinyd wound-up again by starting this thread

It would help the debate along if you liberals knew what the hell you were talking about.

 

[Meister]

Many liberals are gay fool.

There are no liberal Republicans and we know they hate gays.

However, Democrats have both gays and conservatives.

Rather odd, wouldn't you say?

Romney GAY adviser leaves campaign amid controversy ? CNN

There are republican gays also, deen.....and also, there are liberal republicans.
I hate to burst your partisan wingnut bubble...but.....

There are no liberal Republicans and Republicans hate gays. There are black Republicans and Republicans hate blacks. There are always a few masochists among us.

When a person is as far left as you are, you probably couldn't believe there are liberal republicans. But, the rest of us don't see the world through your eyes, deen.

 

[Anitabeme]

A lot of people are proud that Obama was able to get away with that. The ability to keep the media so docile and the nerve to stand before America and coolly parse and deflect to obscure the facts are considered positive traits to them. Well, since it's Democrats who did it it is considered positive.

If it had been Republicans, the Democrats and their media would not have let this happen.

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Really? How many ambassadors died under Bush? I'll give you a hint. None.

U.S. ambassadors killed in line of duty: Chris Stevens was the sixth, here are the other five.

 

[Anitabeme]

Gotta keep Benghazi on the down low....Hilary wouldn't look good with the actual truth out there and her upcoming coronation in 2016 might become in jepardy.

You can be sure that her "what does it matter" comment will be prominent in her 2016 presidential bid.

Yeah, these treasonous criminals don't want it to be known they were, and still are, supporting Al Qaeda. Stevens knew it too. Can't let this shit get out, so let them die.

During the 2011 Libyan revolt against Muammar Qaddafi, reckless U.S. policy flung American forces and money into the conflict on the side of the rebels, who were known at the time to include Al Qaeda elements. Previously the number two official at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, Christopher Stevens was named as the official U.S. liaison to the Libyan opposition in March, 2011.

Stevens was tasked with helping to coordinate U.S. assistance to the rebels, whose top military commander, Abdelhakim Belhadj, was the leader of the Al Qaeda affiliate, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). That means that Stevens was authorized by the U.S. Department of State and the Obama administration to aid and abet individuals and groups that were, at a minimum, allied ideologically with Al Qaeda, the jihadist terrorist organization that attacked the homeland on the first 9/11, the one that’s not supposed to exist anymore after the killing of its leader, Osama bin Laden, on May 2, 2011.

Arms Flow to Syria May Be Behind Benghazi Cover-Up | #1 News Site on the Threat of Radical Islam

 

[007]

Gotta keep Benghazi on the down low....Hilary wouldn't look good with the actual truth out there and her upcoming coronation in 2016 might become in jepardy.

Her chances are already gone. She's already in so deep that this is already enough to keep her side lined, if not put her ass in jail.

So now who does the left have... Mooochelle...

The White House for 2016 is being handed to the republicans on a silver platter. All they have to do is play their cards right and keep RINO's out of the race.

 

[007]

Sorry dearest troll. There are indeed liberal Republicans.

I understand how much you need it to be true that Republicans are as full of hate as you say, but some of the most hateful things I've heard said about blacks in modern times have come from the left.

liberal republicans? All two of them? You people have done your best to purge your party of them.

OH!!! and thanks for getting tinyd wound-up again by starting this thread

It would help the debate along if you liberals knew what the hell you were talking about.

They do know though, that's why they're saying what they're saying. The KNOW they have to LIE. It's all they have left to protect their messiah.

 

[Anitabeme]

Gotta keep Benghazi on the down low....Hilary wouldn't look good with the actual truth out there and her upcoming coronation in 2016 might become in jepardy.

Her chances are already gone. She's already in so deep that this is already enough to keep her side lined, if not put her ass in jail.

Her chances are not yet gone. The brainless sheeple will rally around her anyway, just like they rally around this criminal occupying the White House.

 

[007]

Gotta keep Benghazi on the down low....Hilary wouldn't look good with the actual truth out there and her upcoming coronation in 2016 might become in jepardy.

Her chances are already gone. She's already in so deep that this is already enough to keep her side lined, if not put her ass in jail.

Her chances are not yet gone. The brainless sheeple will rally around her anyway, just like they rally around this criminal occupying the White House.

It won't be enough. Actually it will be insignificant after the right wing campaign machine takes aim at her.

Yeah... they're gone.

 

[Star]

A lot of people are proud that Obama was able to get away with that. The ability to keep the media so docile and the nerve to stand before America and coolly parse and deflect to obscure the facts are considered positive traits to them. Well, since it's Democrats who did it it is considered positive.

If it had been Republicans, the Democrats and their media would not have let this happen.

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Really? How many ambassadors died under Bush? I'll give you a hint. None.

U.S. ambassadors killed in line of duty: Chris Stevens was the sixth, here are the other five.

.

and yet...

​

Let me see if I have this correct, are you saying Ambassador Stevens life is more important than the 60 American diplomats that were killed on Bush's watch?


"U.S. President Ronald Reagan on April 18 [1983] denounced the "vicious terrorist bombing" as a "cowardly act," saying, "This criminal act on a diplomatic establishment will not deter us from our goals of peace in the region."[3] Two envoys, Philip C. Habib and Morris Draper, continued their peace mission in Beirut to discuss Lebanese troop withdrawals with a renewed sense of urgency."
.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

A lot of people are proud that Obama was able to get away with that. The ability to keep the media so docile and the nerve to stand before America and coolly parse and deflect to obscure the facts are considered positive traits to them. Well, since it's Democrats who did it it is considered positive.

If it had been Republicans, the Democrats and their media would not have let this happen.

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Still waiting for you to provide specifics.


Or you can admit you lied. Or better yet just remain silent and we'll assume you lied.

 

[rdean]

There are republican gays also, deen.....and also, there are liberal republicans.
I hate to burst your partisan wingnut bubble...but.....

There are no liberal Republicans and Republicans hate gays. There are black Republicans and Republicans hate blacks. There are always a few masochists among us.

Sorry dearest troll. There are indeed liberal Republicans.

I understand how much you need it to be true that Republicans are as full of hate as you say, but some of the most hateful things I've heard said about blacks in modern times have come from the left.

There are no liberal Republicans and you can't name any. And the hateful things said about blacks have come from the conservatives. Just read this board. And there were very few conservatives in the Republican Party before 1964. Now, 90% of the Republican Party is white. Why do you think that is? Come on now. Think it through.

 

[rdean]

A lot of people are proud that Obama was able to get away with that. The ability to keep the media so docile and the nerve to stand before America and coolly parse and deflect to obscure the facts are considered positive traits to them. Well, since it's Democrats who did it it is considered positive.

If it had been Republicans, the Democrats and their media would not have let this happen.

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Still waiting for you to provide specifics.


Or you can admit you lied. Or better yet just remain silent and we'll assume you lied.

I counted 10. Seems to be enough info to look it up on Google.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

It's become quite clear that these men were just left to die.

Throughout the night, sources say Americans on the ground in Libya at times felt helpless and abandoned.

"We relied on Washington for dispassionate assessment," one eyewitness told CBS News. "Instead, they [Washington officials] were asking us what help we needed. We answered: 'Send reinforcements!' "

But they were told immediate help wasn't available.

Embassy personnel say they repeatedly asked the Defense Attache on site in Tripoli for military assistance.

"Isn't there anything available?" one Embassy official says he asked. "But the answer was 'no.'"

"What about Aviano?" the official pressed, referencing the NATO air base with US assets in northeastern Italy. "No," was the answer.

Two of the four Americans killed that night died hours after the first attack began

Three more officials to testify about Benghazi attacks - CBS News

only to nutters....

Oh? So it is your belief that ther was some effort to protect them that was taken -- but which just, sadly, fell a little short of that objective?

Pray tell.

What was done?

 

[g5000]

It's become quite clear that these men were just left to die.

Throughout the night, sources say Americans on the ground in Libya at times felt helpless and abandoned.

"We relied on Washington for dispassionate assessment," one eyewitness told CBS News. "Instead, they [Washington officials] were asking us what help we needed. We answered: 'Send reinforcements!' "

But they were told immediate help wasn't available.

Embassy personnel say they repeatedly asked the Defense Attache on site in Tripoli for military assistance.

"Isn't there anything available?" one Embassy official says he asked. "But the answer was 'no.'"

"What about Aviano?" the official pressed, referencing the NATO air base with US assets in northeastern Italy. "No," was the answer.

Two of the four Americans killed that night died hours after the first attack began

Three more officials to testify about Benghazi attacks - CBS News

only to nutters....

Oh? So it is your belief that ther was some effort to protect them that was taken -- but which just, sadly, fell a little short of that objective?

Pray tell.

What was done?

You see that "two of the four Americans killed that night died hours after the first attack began"?

Those two were part of a rescue team sent in to help. tinydancer and other piss drinkers like yourself have to constantly wipe that part from their memories when this is explained to them.

The consulate attack was over in minutes. There was no way the first two who were killed could have been saved by a rescue team. None. Zip. Zilch. Impossible.

The CIA annex responded within 20 minutes of hearing of the attack. They sent a rescue team to the consulate and picked up the survivors and brought them back to the annex.

Two lies have been manufactured just around these simple facts. One: "Obama watched as the Ambassador died". Two: "A seven hour battle at the consulate".

The attack on the consulate was over in minutes. Clearly, the liars are not the slightest bit interested in the truth.

Moving on, a rescue team from Tripoli arrived at the annex. Got that? A rescue team was sent from Tripoli to help. Let that FACT sink in.

Seven and a half hours after the consulate attack, a second attack occurred at a separate location. The annex. And during this attack, two of the rescuers were killed.

Now let THAT sink in.

You fucking idiots keep claiming there were "stand down orders" and that no help was sent and then you wail and gnash your teeth in faux outrage over a couple of guys FROM THE RESCUE TEAM who died!

Fucking. Amazing. How do you flip flop all this shit around in your skulls without suffering serious cognitive dissonance?

Oh, yeah. You have to be cognitive first...

A second rescue team was also forming up in Tripoli. Their plan was to board a Libyan C-130.

Got that? A C-130 that belonged to the Libyans. And that means they needed permission from the Libyan government to use that plane.

A State Department official busted his ass trying to get authorization from the appropriate Libyan authorities.

However, he did not get permission before the C-130 left, and so the second rescue team was told they could not go on that plane. "You can't go now." But the assholes who want to perpetuate the "stand down order" MYTH, truncate that to "you can't go". A HUGE lie of omission.

This has been manufactured into a "stand down order" by idiots who have no clue how the military works. They don't know what a stand down order is. They are misusing the term.

You only hear idiot politicians and yellow journalists using that term. Read the testimony. Only an asshole politician uses it, and he totally misuses it.

The second rescue team was finally able to get on another plane and fly to Benghazi, but they were too late.

Now let THOSE "startling new details" sink into your thick heads.

So what do we have from the shitbirds? Several lies. Obama dispassionately watching the Ambassador die through the lens of a drone. No rescue team sent. A stand down order.

You would have to be a special kind of idiot to believe these people are after the truth. You fools have weaved an entirely false fantasy surrounding the events which actually occurred.

 

[g5000]

Oh, let's add another lie by the whackjobs. They called the three people they are wetting their pants over, "Benghazi survivors".

Those three were nowhere near Benghazi when the attacks occurred.

But hey, let's take some blood from the dead and wounded and the real survivors of Benghazi and smear it on these guys! Our poor bloody lambs...

These are not the actions of people who want to know the truth.

 

[Anitabeme]

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Really? How many ambassadors died under Bush? I'll give you a hint. None.

U.S. ambassadors killed in line of duty: Chris Stevens was the sixth, here are the other five.

.

and yet...

​

Let me see if I have this correct, are you saying Ambassador Stevens life is more important than the 60 American diplomats that were killed on Bush's watch?


"U.S. President Ronald Reagan on April 18 [1983] denounced the "vicious terrorist bombing" as a "cowardly act," saying, "This criminal act on a diplomatic establishment will not deter us from our goals of peace in the region."[3] Two envoys, Philip C. Habib and Morris Draper, continued their peace mission in Beirut to discuss Lebanese troop withdrawals with a renewed sense of urgency."
.

How many of those other incidents were a 7 hour unanswered attack? They had plenty of warning they were going to be attacked, and Stevens was in fear for his life, but no adequate protection was given. They had time to send help, but didn't bother. The ones that could have helped were told to STAND DOWN. WTF gives you the idea that ANY of those other attacks are anything like Benghazi? It's absolutely criminal what this administration did.

 

[Anitabeme]

only to nutters....

Oh? So it is your belief that ther was some effort to protect them that was taken -- but which just, sadly, fell a little short of that objective?

Pray tell.

What was done?

You see that "two of the four Americans killed that night died hours after the first attack began"?

Those two were part of a rescue team sent in to help. tinydancer and other piss drinkers like yourself have to constantly wipe that part from their memories when this is explained to them.

The consulate attack was over in minutes. There was no way the first two who were killed could have been saved by a rescue team. None. Zip. Zilch. Impossible.

The CIA annex responded within 20 minutes of hearing of the attack. They sent a rescue team to the consulate and picked up the survivors and brought them back to the annex.

Two lies have been manufactured just around these simple facts. One: "Obama watched as the Ambassador died". Two: "A seven hour battle at the consulate".

The attack on the consulate was over in minutes. Clearly, the liars are not the slightest bit interested in the truth.

Moving on, a rescue team from Tripoli arrived at the annex. Got that? A rescue team was sent from Tripoli to help. Let that FACT sink in.

Seven and a half hours after the consulate attack, a second attack occurred at a separate location. The annex. And during this attack, two of the rescuers were killed.

Now let THAT sink in.

You fucking idiots keep claiming there were "stand down orders" and that no help was sent and then you wail and gnash your teeth in faux outrage over a couple of guys FROM THE RESCUE TEAM who died!

Fucking. Amazing. How do you flip flop all this shit around in your skulls without suffering serious cognitive dissonance?

Oh, yeah. You have to be cognitive first...

A second rescue team was also forming up in Tripoli. Their plan was to board a Libyan C-130.

Got that? A C-130 that belonged to the Libyans. And that means they needed permission from the Libyan government to use that plane.

A State Department official busted his ass trying to get authorization from the appropriate Libyan authorities.

However, he did not get permission before the C-130 left, and so the second rescue team was told they could not go on that plane. "You can't go now." But the assholes who want to perpetuate the "stand down order" MYTH, truncate that to "you can't go". A HUGE lie of omission.

This has been manufactured into a "stand down order" by idiots who have no clue how the military works. They don't know what a stand down order is. They are misusing the term.

You only hear idiot politicians and yellow journalists using that term. Read the testimony. Only an asshole politician uses it, and he totally misuses it.

The second rescue team was finally able to get on another plane and fly to Benghazi, but they were too late.

Now let THOSE "startling new details" sink into your thick heads.

So what do we have from the shitbirds? Several lies. Obama dispassionately watching the Ambassador die through the lens of a drone. No rescue team sent. A stand down order.

You would have to be a special kind of idiot to believe these people are after the truth. You fools have weaved an entirely false fantasy surrounding the events which actually occurred.

So the people that claim to have been told to stand down are lying? Why would they do that?

Perhaps you can share a link to the "real" story?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Bush had 10 (at least) attacks under his watchful closed eyes. I don't recall much of an uproar...how about you?

Still waiting for you to provide specifics.


Or you can admit you lied. Or better yet just remain silent and we'll assume you lied.

I counted 10. Seems to be enough info to look it up on Google.

You saved candycorn's ass.