State Dept Tries to Limit Questions Hillary / Staff Can Be Asked

[easyt65]

State Department: Don’t Ask Hillary Aides About Classified Info in Lawsuit

Lawyers for the State Department want to limit the types of questions that a watchdog group can ask former aides to Hillary Clinton, and potentially the former secretary of state herself, about her creation and use of a private email system while she was in office.

The department asked a federal judge Tuesday night to grant “limited discovery” to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group that wants to depose some of Clinton’s closest associates and staffers.


The lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch is one of dozens by activists and journalists seeking information about Clinton’s private email system, which was run out of a “homebrew” server in her house in New York. It’s unusual, however, in that it’s only one of two cases in which a federal judge has agreed to allow discovery, including potential examination of government documents and interviews with current or former officials.

This is kinda what happens when you set up a private server in an attempt to avoid the FOIA and what happens when the administration of the man who promised the most transparent administration evuh is found GUILTY of illegally failing to comply with the FOIA a whopping, record-setting 70% of the time.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Judicial Watch has become a master at making headlines without actually doing anything.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lynch is 100% corrupt. Is this a surprise to anyone?

 

[Moonglow]

They have to limit questions that can be made public, what's new about that?

 

[daws101]

State Department: Don’t Ask Hillary Aides About Classified Info in Lawsuit

Lawyers for the State Department want to limit the types of questions that a watchdog group can ask former aides to Hillary Clinton, and potentially the former secretary of state herself, about her creation and use of a private email system while she was in office.

The department asked a federal judge Tuesday night to grant “limited discovery” to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group that wants to depose some of Clinton’s closest associates and staffers.


The lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch is one of dozens by activists and journalists seeking information about Clinton’s private email system, which was run out of a “homebrew” server in her house in New York. It’s unusual, however, in that it’s only one of two cases in which a federal judge has agreed to allow discovery, including potential examination of government documents and interviews with current or former officials.

This is kinda what happens when you set up a private server in an attempt to avoid the FOIA and what happens when the administration of the man who promised the most transparent administration evuh is found GUILTY of illegally failing to comply with the FOIA a whopping, record-setting 70% of the time.

You don't bitch when Trump and Cruz do it so why now?

 

[daws101]

Lynch is 100% corrupt. Is this a surprise to anyone?

Link?

 

[OKTexas]

Lynch is 100% corrupt. Is this a surprise to anyone?

She is DOJ, not State.

 

[daws101]

Lynch is 100% corrupt. Is this a surprise to anyone?

She is DOJ, not State.

Shhh, he's on a roll.
.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Judicial Watch has become a master at making headlines without actually doing anything.

That damned 1st Amendment again. Your party is working feverishly to get rid of it (and the other 9 amendments of the BOR,) but until then, you have Lynch who is a crook and refused to follow any laws. Her department of corruption will do whatever it takes to protect party member Hillary.

 

[Uncensored2008]

She is DOJ, not State.

Didn't they rename it DOC? Department of Corruption? If not, they should.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Judicial Watch has become a master at making headlines without actually doing anything.

That damned 1st Amendment again. Your party is working feverishly to get rid of it (and the other 9 amendments of the BOR,) but until then, you have Lynch who is a crook and refused to follow any laws. Her department of corruption will do whatever it takes to protect party member Hillary.

3 lies in 3 sentences. I think you can do better.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

State Department: Don’t Ask Hillary Aides About Classified Info in Lawsuit

Lawyers for the State Department want to limit the types of questions that a watchdog group can ask former aides to Hillary Clinton, and potentially the former secretary of state herself, about her creation and use of a private email system while she was in office.

The department asked a federal judge Tuesday night to grant “limited discovery” to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group that wants to depose some of Clinton’s closest associates and staffers.


The lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch is one of dozens by activists and journalists seeking information about Clinton’s private email system, which was run out of a “homebrew” server in her house in New York. It’s unusual, however, in that it’s only one of two cases in which a federal judge has agreed to allow discovery, including potential examination of government documents and interviews with current or former officials.

This is kinda what happens when you set up a private server in an attempt to avoid the FOIA and what happens when the administration of the man who promised the most transparent administration evuh is found GUILTY of illegally failing to comply with the FOIA a whopping, record-setting 70% of the time.

You don't bitch when Trump and Cruz do it so why now?

Apples and pencils... apples and pencils. Presidential candidates vs. former administration official under criminal investigation.

 

[daws101]

Judicial Watch has become a master at making headlines without actually doing anything.

That damned 1st Amendment again. Your party is working feverishly to get rid of it (and the other 9 amendments of the BOR,) but until then, you have Lynch who is a crook and refused to follow any laws. Her department of corruption will do whatever it takes to protect party member Hillary.

3 lies in 3 sentences. I think you can do better.

You want him to lie more or just better?

 

[daws101]

State Department: Don’t Ask Hillary Aides About Classified Info in Lawsuit

Lawyers for the State Department want to limit the types of questions that a watchdog group can ask former aides to Hillary Clinton, and potentially the former secretary of state herself, about her creation and use of a private email system while she was in office.

The department asked a federal judge Tuesday night to grant “limited discovery” to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group that wants to depose some of Clinton’s closest associates and staffers.


The lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch is one of dozens by activists and journalists seeking information about Clinton’s private email system, which was run out of a “homebrew” server in her house in New York. It’s unusual, however, in that it’s only one of two cases in which a federal judge has agreed to allow discovery, including potential examination of government documents and interviews with current or former officials.

This is kinda what happens when you set up a private server in an attempt to avoid the FOIA and what happens when the administration of the man who promised the most transparent administration evuh is found GUILTY of illegally failing to comply with the FOIA a whopping, record-setting 70% of the time.

You don't bitch when Trump and Cruz do it so why now?

Apples and pencils... apples and pencils. Presidential candidates vs. former administration official under criminal investigation.

And?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Judicial Watch has become a master at making headlines without actually doing anything.

That damned 1st Amendment again. Your party is working feverishly to get rid of it (and the other 9 amendments of the BOR,) but until then, you have Lynch who is a crook and refused to follow any laws. Her department of corruption will do whatever it takes to protect party member Hillary.

3 lies in 3 sentences. I think you can do better.

You want him to lie more or just better?

He's not capable of lying better. But I think he could have fit at least 5 or 6 lies into those 3 sentences, considering how effortlessly he does it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

3 lies in 3 sentences. I think you can do better.

Yawn, all facts.

{The Senate also turned a blind eye to Lynch’s role in a possible coverup involving banking giant HSBC. The bank was engaged in a massive money laundering scheme with Latin American drug cartels and Middle Eastern terrorists. Lynch allowed the bank to enter into a “deferred prosecution” settlement that garnered $1.9 billion in fines and the admission of “willful criminal conduct.” But in exchange, she agreed not to pursue criminal investigations and prosecutions of HSBC directors or employees. Apparently the Senate was insufficiently moved by more than 1,000 pages of evidence and secret audio recordings presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee by HSBC whistleblower John Cruz, former HSBC vice president and relationship manager.}

Holder's Corrupt Legacy Lives On in Loretta Lynch

 

[Uncensored2008]

You want him to lie more or just better?

Okay duhs, let's see this alleged "lie?"

Should I hold my breath?

 

[OKTexas]

She is DOJ, not State.

Didn't they rename it DOC? Department of Corruption? If not, they should.

DOI, Dept of Injustice would be more appropriate.

 

[TheOldSchool]

3 lies in 3 sentences. I think you can do better.

Yawn, all facts.

{The Senate also turned a blind eye to Lynch’s role in a possible coverup involving banking giant HSBC. The bank was engaged in a massive money laundering scheme with Latin American drug cartels and Middle Eastern terrorists. Lynch allowed the bank to enter into a “deferred prosecution” settlement that garnered $1.9 billion in fines and the admission of “willful criminal conduct.” But in exchange, she agreed not to pursue criminal investigations and prosecutions of HSBC directors or employees. Apparently the Senate was insufficiently moved by more than 1,000 pages of evidence and secret audio recordings presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee by HSBC whistleblower John Cruz, former HSBC vice president and relationship manager.}

Holder's Corrupt Legacy Lives On in Loretta Lynch

Hmm defending your lies by ignoring them and bringing up a conspiracy that nobody, including the republican led senate that confirmed Lynch, believes. You're not trying hard enough.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hmm defending your lies by ignoring them and bringing up a conspiracy that nobody, including the republican led senate that confirmed Lynch, believes. You're not trying hard enough.

You are a drooling reatard.

Show us these "3 lies," hack?

Now before you ooze off, let's define "lie."

YOU think a lie is any statement which opposes or fails to promote the party, as does duhs.

BUT a lie is actually the material misstatement of fact for the purpose of deceit.

Slink along back into the gutter now, sploogy.