Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, Trump made the issue religious. They were responding to show how shallow and stupid his opinions were. So what if Hasan shouted Allah Akbar. What does that have to do with their son? ie, nothing.
I would say the war on terror began with the first invasion in 1991. Or maybe before that....when the US started interfering in the ME. The US hates others interfering in its own internal affairs, yet seems to have no problem doing that to others.
Here is what a muslim US citizen said about Hasan gunning down 13 fellow US Servicemen
Anwar al-Awlaki praised Hasan's actions:
Nidal Hassan [sic] is a hero. He is a man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people.... Any decent Muslim cannot live, understanding properly his duties towards his Creator and his fellow Muslims, and yet serve as a US soldier. The U.S. is leading the war against terrorism which in reality is a war against Islam.
Nidal Hasan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Awlaki was an Imam and a lecturer, a leader in the US muslim community
And I'm sure I could find a quote from a Christian who thinks Timothy McVeigh's actions were okay. Taking your pathetic conclusion to the end, all Christians think McVeigh did the right thing. See how it works?
Which is why I said it's believable that the gaping flaw in your OP could very well be to ignorance, not lying. Not uncommon for bigots like you. And again, your struggles with English provide a valid explanation for how you could have fucked up your OP so badly.If you knew you were right, you would take the bet.
I took the bet? yeah right on liar, It is simply astonishing at how puerile, trolling, and dishonest you liberals get when asked to back your claims with evidence.
I see reading for comprehension is an issue for you. That certainly explains your glaringly wrong OP.
I did not say you took the bet. What on Earth did I say that you thought I said that??
I said, if you knew you were right, you would take the bet.
yup you got me on that one, so what, I posted too fast. That 's called honesty, watch and learn child, watch and learn.
Your explanations fall on deaf ears since the real reason you won't touch that bet is because you know you'll lose. That's how fragile your OP is.I have explained why I won't take the bet, but you have not explained why you won't simply post any data to refute me outright. You see fuckclown, I don't replace intellectual honesty with your retarded liberal games, I just won't play
That you flat out refuse to touch the bet, which risks the most nominal of consequences. already reveals you are wrong.Spits a rightard who starts a thread based on his own inability to comprehend what he reads.It's so simple, get the data, how hard is that?
I stand corrected, all liberals have a personality disorder
so get the data liar, get the data, take that first step into integrityland, c'mon you can do it
I agree that Khan pimped out his son for the DNC and I don't think he ever should have done that.Dont expect to see too many Dems respond to this except to attack you personally and change the topic.
It's a pathetic topic. 14 Americans of the Muslim faith have made the ultimate sacrifice for your country and some keyboard warrior Trump acolyte (who like his hero has probably never made a sacrifice in his life) disses them. It's disgusting that he could make such light of the dead.
it is disgusting that the democrats would use that paltry figure for political gain and claim it is significant, especially when compared to the level of muslim violence against the rest of the US
ok, but I in this thread am responding to Khan and democrats, not trump. thanks however for pointing out that this was a religious issue.
The muslim war on the US began under Clinton, when Bin laden declared war on us, not during desert shield. The American declaration wasn't until 2001.
Nothing. But when one is a certifiable bigot, there is no denigration too low to grasp at.and Hasan killed one American servicemen for each one of them, in the name of islam
And?? That has what to do with the 14 dead US servicemen?
why would anybody claim that US muslims are somehow as asset?
Well don't say that 'they' started it when clearly Trump did. That's like talking about the great Chicago Bulls team of the 80s/90s and ignoring Michael Jordan.
No, the war began when disenfranchised Saudis saw that they lived in a oppressive totalitarian regime upheld by the likes of the US. That aside, your pal Ronnie Raygun armed Bin Laden.
why would anybody claim that US muslims are somehow as asset?
Because people aren't idiots. They don't take the actions of a few as te norm. They don't take actions by 0.0001% of a particular religion/gender/whatever bigotted idea is on the table, and see it is as the norm. Only the chicken littles do. Only those who love to hate do. Is what it is I guess.
it is part of the measure of sacrifice versus pain inflicted, muslims are not worth it
it is part of the measure of sacrifice versus pain inflicted, muslims are not worth it
What have you sacrificed for your country?
That you flat out refuse to touch the bet, which risks the most nominal of consequences. already reveals you are wrong.Spits a rightard who starts a thread based on his own inability to comprehend what he reads.It's so simple, get the data, how hard is that?
I stand corrected, all liberals have a personality disorder
so get the data liar, get the data, take that first step into integrityland, c'mon you can do it
[
correct we are not idiots, we know it only takes a few muslims to ruin society,
[
doesn't matter, that is not the topic of discussion, deflection to ad hominem I see
what I will say is that I do not promote terrorism
[
doesn't matter, that is not the topic of discussion, deflection to ad hominem I see
what I will say is that I do not promote terrorism
On the contrary. when you open up the lack of empathy you have for the sacrifices of people due to their religion, all sacrifices are on the table.
As I was saying, what have you sacrificed?
No, That has to do with one crazy person who flipped out.I'm not trying to differentiate between anybody - gender, race or religion. You are. You seem to think that the deaths of 14 US servicemen who happen to be Muslim is somehow related to some whackos killing servicemen. They are not. The only things they have in common is their religion and gender. How come you're not making a big deal out of their gender?
This whole goddam war is because Bush lied. People died. End of story.
the democrats and Khan first made this the issue based on religion, not me. Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar" as he gunned down 13 US servicemen, you think that has nothing to do with religion?
The war on terror is not a war on Islam.the war on terror began when 20 muslims rammed aircraft into 3 US buildings in the name of Islam, that is well known history, are you trying to revise that?
then you must also consider what has that religion done to damage America, it is the sum total that matters. 14 dead on the battle field pales compared to the damage islam creates
I am irrelevant to the point, what a desperate reach
