Steve McGarrett On How Obama Could Be Indicted Over Wiretapping Trump Tower

[Steve_McGarrett]

This is Steve McGarrett, American patriot.

So far as i can understand as of this moment, from various online sources:

1. Apparently the Obama administration tried to apply to FISA to tap all the lines into trump tower, including those of a russian bank, for the relatively narrow justification that the russian bank was likely guilty of some wrongdoing. Apparently the FISA court turned them down on the overly broad wiretap request, but later granted a tailored version of that request to tap only the lines leading to the russian bank inside the Trump tower.

2. Apparently the Obama adminstration went ahead and tapped all of the lines in the Trump tower including the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.


In my superior opinion, this would be watergate magnitude information, and could lead to criminal indictments inside the intelligence agencies against officials that exceeded the narrowly tailored FISA wiretap order against the russian bank. A prosecutor could follow the money and follow the paper trail all the way to the White House and even potentially obama himself.

This is Watergate by 100! Watch the whole news segment from this morning on how big this is.

 

[Lakhota]

Breitbart started these false rumors. Trump took the bait.

 

[Lakhota]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

 

[Timmy]

Fake news at its best (aka the worst )!

 

[miketx]

What's the word from Josh Earnest on this?

 

[miketx]

Breitbart started these false rumors. Trump took the bait.

Proof? No? Not again?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

It will be presented soon. Emperor Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof and consulting with his White House legal counsel..

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

Didnt watch the video did you.

 

[Coyote]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

The only "proof" is Trump "says so". That's it. These people are spinning on crazy conspiracy theories.

Where is the evidence it was tapped? There isn't even an iota provided - just words.

Trump as prez can declassify and provide evidence if there isn't any. But he hasn't. It's like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

 

[Coyote]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

It will be presented soon. Emperor Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof and consulting with his White House legal counsel..

Emperor Trump constantly tweets with out proof and usually, on an impulse that excludes consultation with anyone else.

 

[PurpleOwl]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

It will be presented soon. Emperor Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof and consulting with his White House legal counsel..

how much would you pay to blow donald?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

It will be presented soon. Emperor Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof and consulting with his White House legal counsel..

Emperor Trump constantly tweets with out proof and usually, on an impulse that excludes consultation with anyone else.

The ramifications of this cannot be overstated. Nobody, much less a chess player like Trump, would make such an accusation without the proof in hand. You just don’t drop the equivalent of a twitter nuclear bomb because you woke up and felt like it. This is the most serious revelation to date of the Trump Presidency.

Wikileaks obtained bulk emails either by a person who leaked or through a phishing scam on Podesta. Those were on a private email server.

This on the other hand is the direct wiretapping of an opposition party using the might and power of Federal agencies. There is no equivalency here.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

It will be presented soon. Emperor Trump wouldn't have tweeted anything without proof and consulting with his White House legal counsel..

how much would you pay to blow donald?

Are you a Muslim or Jew?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

The only "proof" is Trump "says so". That's it. These people are spinning on crazy conspiracy theories.

Where is the evidence it was tapped? There isn't even an iota provided - just words.

Trump as prez can declassify and provide evidence if there isn't any. But he hasn't. It's like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

Thats a flat out lie.
They have the FISA request from the barry administration.

 

[dcbl]

like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

you mean like the Russia colluding with Trump officials thing?

 

[dcbl]

The ramifications of this cannot be overstated. Nobody, much less a chess player like Trump, would make such an accusation without the proof in hand. You just don’t drop the equivalent of a twitter nuclear bomb because you woke up and felt like it. This is the most serious revelation to date of the Trump Presidency.

I have to agree with this. One of the problems our friends on the left and in the media have is that they consistently underestimate Trump, they act like they think he is stupid (which is hilarious) & that they think he is incompetent

I kind of hope they continue with that line of nonsense

A big problem we (*we as conservatives) have is that the lion's share of the "traditional media" does collude with the democrat party & with leftists in general (this was brought to light through wikileaks)

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The ramifications of this cannot be overstated. Nobody, much less a chess player like Trump, would make such an accusation without the proof in hand. You just don’t drop the equivalent of a twitter nuclear bomb because you woke up and felt like it. This is the most serious revelation to date of the Trump Presidency.

I have to agree with this. One of the problems our friends on the left and in the media have is that they consistently underestimate Trump, they act like they think he is stupid (which is hilarious) & that they think he is incompetent

I kind of hope they continue with that line of nonsense

A big problem we (*we as conservatives) have is that the lion's share of the "traditional media" does collude with the democrat party & with leftists in general (this was brought to light through wikileaks)

I wholeheartedly agree?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

The only "proof" is Trump "says so". That's it. These people are spinning on crazy conspiracy theories.

Where is the evidence it was tapped? There isn't even an iota provided - just words.

Trump as prez can declassify and provide evidence if there isn't any. But he hasn't. It's like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

Thats a flat out lie.
They have the FISA request from the barry administration.

They do?

You seem to be the only person who knows about this. Where are you getting your information?

 

[Coyote]

like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

you mean like the Russia colluding with Trump officials thing?

Nope. I think that deserves to be investigated - there's enough evidence there to support an independent bipartisan investigation (though not a special prosecutor) in order to get to the bottom of it. Frankly, we ought to be concerned at what the Russians have attempted to do, and in order to make sure this kind of disruption doesn't happen again we need to know exactly what happened. I can't understand how folks that supported endless investigations on Clinton's email, on Benghazi balk at this.

 

[PurpleOwl]

Where's the proof? Give us some proof.

The only "proof" is Trump "says so". That's it. These people are spinning on crazy conspiracy theories.

Where is the evidence it was tapped? There isn't even an iota provided - just words.

Trump as prez can declassify and provide evidence if there isn't any. But he hasn't. It's like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

they can always fabricate evidence

like all his other baseless claims designed to distract from the real issues.

you mean like the Russia colluding with Trump officials thing?

Nope. I think that deserves to be investigated - there's enough evidence there to support an independent bipartisan investigation (though not a special prosecutor) in order to get to the bottom of it. Frankly, we ought to be concerned at what the Russians have attempted to do, and in order to make sure this kind of disruption doesn't happen again we need to know exactly what happened. I can't understand how folks that supported endless investigations on Clinton's email, on Benghazi balk at this.

because they dont believe benghazi was a big deal they never did, they didn't care about monica lewinski or pizzagate either. They dont even believe this story, they wont believe the next insane conspiracy theory either.