Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 53,021
- 15,792
- 2,180
I think you just caved. You can’t reply on point (obviously) so you deflect.
Not unexpected from a weak sauce libtard such as you.
Laughing....other than citing the National Academy of Science shredding your argument, you mean? Who peer reviewed John Lott's 'analysis'? The only peer review I was able to find was the PNAS, where they eviscerated his entire paper.
The PNAS eviceration of your 'crystal clear evidence' is 12 paragraphs and almost 1300 words. Your reply came 2 minutes after I posted.
You never even read it.
And yet you've already ignored it, refusing to acknowledge the peer review of your 'crystal clear evidence' even exists.
Evidence has absolutely nothing to do with your conspiracies, tinfoil.
Last edited: