Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing has been sold to me since I'm European. Why looking at your graph don't you ask yourself the question why the US is so much more expensive?ObamaCare was sold to you rubes as a method to bend that curve DOWN. It was a giant con.You see that big red line on top. That's the US, and looking at that red line nowhere is health care costs rising faster. That rise in healthcare costs have to do with demographics way more then with single payer or privatized health insurance.Yes, let's ask them how they are enjoying their rising per capita health care costs.Why the FUCK would someone demand the government take over their very HEALTH?
Gee, why don't we ask ALL those European countries?
![]()
Single payer is also sold to the rubes as a method to bend the curve down. You can see by the example of the other countries that is also a giant lie.
And those countries are keeping their costs down by rationing.
You know what insurance has gotten a lot cheaper the last few years? Auto insurance. Even though the cost of autos has risen.
We should be buying our health insurance the same way we buy our auto, home, and life insurance.
Right now, we are held hostage by the government and by our employers for our health insurance. We don't get to decide which health insurance we want. If you try to buy insurance as individual, the government has soaked up so much of the market, and forced employers to soak up the market, the individual pool is tiny and thus expensive.
If we were all able to buy our insurance the same way we buy our home, auto, and life insurance, we would see tremendous savings.
It's not Medicare For All. Medicare has significant gaps in coverage that allow for dynamic free market competition and innovation.
So he's clearly misrepresenting the plan, which is pure Single Payer, right out of the gate, as are his flock.
.
The US is more expensive because we have a slapdash Rube Goldberg health care system which is the worst of all possible worlds. It is neither universal nor privatized.Nothing has been sold to me since I'm European. Why looking at your graph don't you ask yourself the question why the US is so much more expensive?ObamaCare was sold to you rubes as a method to bend that curve DOWN. It was a giant con.You see that big red line on top. That's the US, and looking at that red line nowhere is health care costs rising faster. That rise in healthcare costs have to do with demographics way more then with single payer or privatized health insurance.Yes, let's ask them how they are enjoying their rising per capita health care costs.Why the FUCK would someone demand the government take over their very HEALTH?
Gee, why don't we ask ALL those European countries?
![]()
Single payer is also sold to the rubes as a method to bend the curve down. You can see by the example of the other countries that is also a giant lie.
And those countries are keeping their costs down by rationing.
You know what insurance has gotten a lot cheaper the last few years? Auto insurance. Even though the cost of autos has risen.
We should be buying our health insurance the same way we buy our auto, home, and life insurance.
Right now, we are held hostage by the government and by our employers for our health insurance. We don't get to decide which health insurance we want. If you try to buy insurance as individual, the government has soaked up so much of the market, and forced employers to soak up the market, the individual pool is tiny and thus expensive.
If we were all able to buy our insurance the same way we buy our home, auto, and life insurance, we would see tremendous savings.
If we were all able to buy our insurance the same way we buy our home, auto, and life insurance, we would see tremendous savings.
I have seen several threads on here mocking Bernie Sanders' attempt (and now he actually has a bill in the Senate) to push for Medicare for All insurance.
The mocking that goes on is two-fold.....First, the blanket (and ignorant) conclusion that anything that smacks of socialism is automatically "bad"...............and Second, that the government CANNOT afford to insure everyone with the somewhat ill-informed mantra of "where would the money come from?"
Addressing the latter, the answer is surprisingly quite simple: The money would come from DIVERTING what we all are paying private health care insurance companies and that same (or lesser) amount would be paid to our country's treasury....Bear in mind the following facts:
Now, it is difficult to eradicate the right wing entrenched opinion that anything that is socialized is automatically bad......The brainwashing has been so thorough, that no amount of data as to how other countries pay less than half in their socialized medicine offerings, and that people in these other countries actually live LONGER and are healthier.
- Currently, the average household expenditure on HC is over $10,000
- 55 million of our population is ALREADY on government Medicare
- Our government currently expends $60 plus BILLIONS on Medicaid
- 60% of ALL bankruptcies are due to HC
- The current cost of liability insurance for medical care is over $60 Billion per year....and a good portion of that would be eliminated if HC insurance were under the federal umbrella
- Whereas wages increased by less than 4% in the last 10 years, private HC premiums increased by 88%.
- Private HC companies'CEO's compensation is approximately $200 MILLION per year
BUT, if we were to stop and open our minds to the analysis that in our country, private health care insurance is outrageously ripping us off, and that an increase in taxes from our paycheck is the SAME as sending a check to some private insurance company, THEN the Sanders' rationale is much less open to mockery.
Bottom line is this......Who would "lose" under Medicare for ALL in this nation???.....Private HC companies. AND who would win under this same plan?,,,,,,,,,ALL OF US!!!!
How Much Money Do Insurance Companies Make? A Primer - The ...
18 Ridiculous Statistics About The Health Care Industry That Will ...
Private Health Insurance Premiums and Federal Policy ...
We need to tear the entire structure down and make it more like our home, auto, and life insurance markets.
OH, and BTW.........If an employer no longer had to subsidize private HC insurance costs, would THAT make that employer more or less likely to hire additional employees???
Yes, that's right. I've explained many times on this forum that one of the things which will need to be done is to repeal the section of the McCarran-Ferguson Act which artificially created geographical oligarchies for the insurance companies.We need to tear the entire structure down and make it more like our home, auto, and life insurance markets.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stated the following in its Oct. 23, 2009 report "H.R. 3596: Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009," available at cbo.gov:
"Companies that provide health and medical malpractice insurance are currently exempt from the federal antitrust laws insofar as they are engaging in the business of insurance...
I have seen several threads on here mocking Bernie Sanders' attempt (and now he actually has a bill in the Senate) to push for Medicare for All insurance.
The mocking that goes on is two-fold.....First, the blanket (and ignorant) conclusion that anything that smacks of socialism is automatically "bad"...............and Second, that the government CANNOT afford to insure everyone with the somewhat ill-informed mantra of "where would the money come from?"
Addressing the latter, the answer is surprisingly quite simple: The money would come from DIVERTING what we all are paying private health care insurance companies and that same (or lesser) amount would be paid to our country's treasury....Bear in mind the following facts:
Now, it is difficult to eradicate the right wing entrenched opinion that anything that is socialized is automatically bad......The brainwashing has been so thorough, that no amount of data as to how other countries pay less than half in their socialized medicine offerings, and that people in these other countries actually live LONGER and are healthier.
- Currently, the average household expenditure on HC is over $10,000
- 55 million of our population is ALREADY on government Medicare
- Our government currently expends $60 plus BILLIONS on Medicaid
- 60% of ALL bankruptcies are due to HC
- The current cost of liability insurance for medical care is over $60 Billion per year....and a good portion of that would be eliminated if HC insurance were under the federal umbrella
- Whereas wages increased by less than 4% in the last 10 years, private HC premiums increased by 88%.
- Private HC companies'CEO's compensation is approximately $200 MILLION per year
BUT, if we were to stop and open our minds to the analysis that in our country, private health care insurance is outrageously ripping us off, and that an increase in taxes from our paycheck is the SAME as sending a check to some private insurance company, THEN the Sanders' rationale is much less open to mockery.
Bottom line is this......Who would "lose" under Medicare for ALL in this nation???.....Private HC companies. AND who would win under this same plan?,,,,,,,,,ALL OF US!!!!
How Much Money Do Insurance Companies Make? A Primer - The ...
18 Ridiculous Statistics About The Health Care Industry That Will ...
Private Health Insurance Premiums and Federal Policy ...
You do realize you are proving my point that government interference in the health insurance market is causing higher costs, right?We need to tear the entire structure down and make it more like our home, auto, and life insurance markets.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stated the following in its Oct. 23, 2009 report "H.R. 3596: Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009," available at cbo.gov:
"Companies that provide health and medical malpractice insurance are currently exempt from the federal antitrust laws insofar as they are engaging in the business of insurance...
OH, and BTW.........If an employer no longer had to subsidize private HC insurance costs, would THAT make that employer more or less likely to hire additional employees???
One more reason to repeal ACA
I don't know what the best way to fix health care is, do know that the average working person keeps having to pay more for every thing, while getting less in every area.
I have seen several threads on here mocking Bernie Sanders' attempt (and now he actually has a bill in the Senate) to push for Medicare for All insurance.
The mocking that goes on is two-fold.....First, the blanket (and ignorant) conclusion that anything that smacks of socialism is automatically "bad"...............and Second, that the government CANNOT afford to insure everyone with the somewhat ill-informed mantra of "where would the money come from?"
Addressing the latter, the answer is surprisingly quite simple: The money would come from DIVERTING what we all are paying private health care insurance companies and that same (or lesser) amount would be paid to our country's treasury....Bear in mind the following facts:
Now, it is difficult to eradicate the right wing entrenched opinion that anything that is socialized is automatically bad......The brainwashing has been so thorough, that no amount of data as to how other countries pay less than half in their socialized medicine offerings, and that people in these other countries actually live LONGER and are healthier.
- Currently, the average household expenditure on HC is over $10,000
- 55 million of our population is ALREADY on government Medicare
- Our government currently expends $60 plus BILLIONS on Medicaid
- 60% of ALL bankruptcies are due to HC
- The current cost of liability insurance for medical care is over $60 Billion per year....and a good portion of that would be eliminated if HC insurance were under the federal umbrella
- Whereas wages increased by less than 4% in the last 10 years, private HC premiums increased by 88%.
- Private HC companies'CEO's compensation is approximately $200 MILLION per year
BUT, if we were to stop and open our minds to the analysis that in our country, private health care insurance is outrageously ripping us off, and that an increase in taxes from our paycheck is the SAME as sending a check to some private insurance company, THEN the Sanders' rationale is much less open to mockery.
Bottom line is this......Who would "lose" under Medicare for ALL in this nation???.....Private HC companies. AND who would win under this same plan?,,,,,,,,,ALL OF US!!!!
How Much Money Do Insurance Companies Make? A Primer - The ...
18 Ridiculous Statistics About The Health Care Industry That Will ...
Private Health Insurance Premiums and Federal Policy ...
Why go on theory, just ask a Canadian about single payer systems and the greater system of centralized control that you submit to the state for this "privilege" which the state bestows on you (if it wishes, and of course, takes it away when you are dying in the hallway of a hospital).
Or maybe other members of dirt poor socialist systems (which by the way, Canada might be if not beside the greatest capitalist nation in history, and of course, our state run exploitation of the U.S) could provide their experiences on this forum.
When you start going to "single payer this", "universal that", "banning of this and that language"...you are headed towards socialism.
Clinton and her global agenda failed for a reason, do not allow Bernie to hoodwink the capitalist system based on individual liberty, ambition and contribution. Get smart, get creative, but tell this socialist that his ideals are better served in Russia, China, Cuba or some other hellhole. Leave America to remain a free and individual driven Republic! The only nation left for those seeking liberty as your Forefathers outlines.