Strength of British military falls for ninth year

Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
 
Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
Bolton: The United States will not rest until Maduro resigns | tellerreport.com

A system like that in Venezuela, which enjoys massive and active support of over half of the population, is not going to fall, not even due to a large scale invasion. A regular western country would already have fallen under this pressure.
 
Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
Bolton: The United States will not rest until Maduro resigns | tellerreport.com

A system like that in Venezuela, which enjoys massive and active support of over half of the population, is not going to fall, not even due to a large scale invasion. A regular western country would already have fallen under this pressure.

All Marxist based systems are short-lived.

Had Venezuelans not disarmed five years ago, it would be over.
 
Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Except that similar out of control growth of entitlements is, as far as I know, universal among FIrst World Nations.


So, with all due respect, unless you can show me that I am wrong on that fact, your point about capitalism, is not only refuted,


but ....


Well, let's leave it with refuted.
We have a different system here. Health insurance is an obligation and people cannot be rejected. We have less comedones between the production of a medicine and its receiver.


Your evasion is accepted as an admission of defeat.
 
Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
Bolton: The United States will not rest until Maduro resigns | tellerreport.com

A system like that in Venezuela, which enjoys massive and active support of over half of the population, is not going to fall, not even due to a large scale invasion. A regular western country would already have fallen under this pressure.

All Marxist based systems are short-lived.

Had Venezuelans not disarmed five years ago, it would be over.
Actually, Venezuela is not an utopian Marxist based system. And again, guns for personal defense are still allowed in Venezuela.
 
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Except that similar out of control growth of entitlements is, as far as I know, universal among FIrst World Nations.


So, with all due respect, unless you can show me that I am wrong on that fact, your point about capitalism, is not only refuted,


but ....


Well, let's leave it with refuted.
We have a different system here. Health insurance is an obligation and people cannot be rejected. We have less comedones between the production of a medicine and its receiver.


Your evasion is accepted as an admission of defeat.
Ok, then.

People are dying: Insulin being rationed as drug prices rise
Elderly couple found dead in apparent murder-suicide, note says they could not afford medical care
 
Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
Bolton: The United States will not rest until Maduro resigns | tellerreport.com

A system like that in Venezuela, which enjoys massive and active support of over half of the population, is not going to fall, not even due to a large scale invasion. A regular western country would already have fallen under this pressure.

All Marxist based systems are short-lived.

Had Venezuelans not disarmed five years ago, it would be over.
Actually, Venezuela is not an utopian Marxist based system. And again, guns for personal defense are still allowed in Venezuela.

If you're in the Maduro Fan Club. Otherwise, no.
 
Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Except that similar out of control growth of entitlements is, as far as I know, universal among FIrst World Nations.


So, with all due respect, unless you can show me that I am wrong on that fact, your point about capitalism, is not only refuted,


but ....


Well, let's leave it with refuted.
We have a different system here. Health insurance is an obligation and people cannot be rejected. We have less comedones between the production of a medicine and its receiver.


Your evasion is accepted as an admission of defeat.
Ok, then.

People are dying: Insulin being rationed as drug prices rise
Elderly couple found dead in apparent murder-suicide, note says they could not afford medical care


Are you sure you want to pretend to be too stupid to understand what I challenged you to do?


Because if I have to walk you though it, like you are a child, I will treat you as a child from now on.
 
Totally ass-backwards assessment.
The Brits can't afford a large standing army because socialism eats up all of the money. Right now they're paying for millions of migrants that are living off of the rest of the country's taxes.
The US debt clock shows they can´t afford a military as well.

Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Who is we? Where do you live?
 
The US debt clock shows they can´t afford a military as well.

Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Who is we? Where do you live?
Germany.
 
Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Who is we? Where do you live?
Germany.

Where you live I don't know - but you are not a native German and you have absolutelly nothing to do with Germany. We lost by the way this year 2/3 of our air force. And this in times of deepest peace. Two jets had a collision.

 
Last edited:
European armies on the decline. Dwindling state and security. Core responsibility of the state: Ensure the rich get richer.

Strength of British military falls for ninth year
Totally ass-backwards assessment.
The Brits can't afford a large standing army because socialism eats up all of the money. Right now they're paying for millions of migrants that are living off of the rest of the country's taxes.
The US debt clock shows they can´t afford a military as well.

You can thank the U.S. for your freedom.

Thank you. Now take your soldiers and bring them home or let them here. But when Donald Trump should like to visit Germany, then he should think about hat Hitler survived more than 40 attempts of assassination, what doesn't mean Donald Trump will survive only more than 1. No one here is able to give any guarantee for his life.

 
Last edited:
The US debt clock shows they can´t afford a military as well.

Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional

Not on this planet, in this time.
Think differently. The carriers and bases are why you need them.

Think rationally. It's a violent world, likely to become more so.

Sure is the USA a violent world.

 
Militarily? I'm for it.
Granted. But it isn´t realistic and the effort doesn´t justify the costs. Actually, the costs could lead to a collapse similar to the one of the SU.


Why would we? If necessary, we can raze it from the air.
Bolton, Pompeo, Trump, they all dream of the invasion. Because bombing Venezuela would not earn them a drop of oil or allow them to exercise control over it.

It's a moot point. We have no military interest in Venezuela, and Meduro's regime will eventually fall of its own weight, as do all such systems.
Bolton: The United States will not rest until Maduro resigns | tellerreport.com

A system like that in Venezuela, which enjoys massive and active support of over half of the population, is not going to fall, not even due to a large scale invasion. A regular western country would already have fallen under this pressure.

All Marxist based systems are short-lived.

Since Marx ("I am not a Marxist") is dead.

Had Venezuelans not disarmed five years ago, it would be over.

Let me ask you someting else. What for heavens sake has the USA to do with Venezuela? Why do you care always about the problems of other nations? When you had not changed the result of world war 1 then the nationalists of the world (specially France and England) had lost and the mult-nationalists (specially Austria and the Osmans) had won. So what? When the unionists had lost the civil war against the confederate states, then would exist today three instead of two countries in the North of America. So what? Why do you do all this bullshit, which you are doing?



 
Last edited:
European armies on the decline. Dwindling state and security. Core responsibility of the state: Ensure the rich get richer.

Strength of British military falls for ninth year
08horyn.600.jpg


in this picture their are 3 military men and only 3
 
Really, you think the military is causing the debt clock to spin. Why do idiots always blame military spending for the debt when entitlement spending is nearly 4 times military spending?

View attachment 274626
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Who is we? Where do you live?
Germany.

Yea, I want to be more like Germany. Check the news you ignorant nazi, Germany has a shrinking economy and is essentially in recession.
 
Carrierfleets and hundreds of bases abroad are totally optional und you can´t afford them, period.

Both of you are right.


WE can't afford ANYTHING, because our financial situation is a death spiral. But is not the fault of a reasonable sized military, but unsustainable entitlement growth.
The huge entitlement payments of your government are necessary due to the financial holes of pure capitalism. If you had have a solid health system like we do, you could even expect a surplus.

Who is we? Where do you live?
Germany.

Where you live I don't know - but you are not a native German and you have absolutelly nothing to do with Germany. We lost by the way this year 2/3 of our air force. And this in times of deepest peace. Two jets had a collision.


I know that and you can keep your "suspicions" solely based on my nickname. As if a German would use zaangalewa, btw.
Those pilots have not enough hours in the air and the jets are not properly maintained and this is why two jets that are alone in vast space, perform a crash. That did not happen once in Syria, where the SyAF flies the oldest planes in a very high frequency.
 

Forum List

Back
Top