Supreme Court justices not required to sign sworn affidavits like staff.

[pknopp]

Since nothing was proven concerning any of the staff or employee's this will always cause me to believe one of the Justices leaked the information. Maybe not directly, maybe one was bragging to their wife and she blabbed but as staff I would have refused to sign if the Justices didn't have to.

Justices participated in leak investigation, Supreme Court official confirms

 

[1srelluc]

Well all they have to do is concentrate on all the men.....No woman could have kept her mouth shut about it for this long.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Thursday’s report also said 82 employees, not including the justices, had access to either a hard copy or an electronic version of the draft opinion. Several people admitted in interviews that “they did not treat information relating to the draft opinion consistent with the court’s confidentiality policies,” the report said.

Further eroding confidence in the Court.

Confidence in U.S. Supreme Court Sinks to Historic Low

Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court is down 11 percentage points this year, falling to a new low of 25%.

news.gallup.com

 

[okfine]

Since nothing was proven concerning any of the staff or employee's this will always cause me to believe one of the Justices leaked the information. Maybe not directly, maybe one was bragging to their wife and she blabbed but as staff I would have refused to sign if the Justices didn't have to.

Justices participated in leak investigation, Supreme Court official confirms

82 have nothing to hide. And 1 of 9 justices is a leaker.

 

[Independent thinker]

Since nothing was proven concerning any of the staff or employee's this will always cause me to believe one of the Justices leaked the information. Maybe not directly, maybe one was bragging to their wife and she blabbed but as staff I would have refused to sign if the Justices didn't have to.

Justices participated in leak investigation, Supreme Court official confirms

I've believed all along that it was a justice themself of doing this but I can't really figure out whether it was a Conservative justice or a Liberal one and it could have been Roberts himself.

 

[pknopp]

So it seems they investigated themselves and found nothing.

The Supreme Court did not disclose its longstanding financial ties with former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff even as it touted him as an expert who independently validated its investigation into who leaked the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/27/politics/supreme-court-chertoff-leak-investigation/

 

[Lord Long Rod]

I am going to go out on a limb here and state that I strongly suspect that those people who are upset that the Justices did not sign affidavits are the exact same people who think Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist and a Nazi.

 

[pknopp]

I am going to go out on a limb here and state that I strongly suspect that those people who are upset that the Justices did not sign affidavits are the exact same people who think Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist and a Nazi.

I posted the link and I have said the Kavanaugh complaints were about the wrong things. He can't be held to something someone else did 30 years ago but he can be held to his rulings.

Dems were stupid to go after something someone said happened 30 years ago and not say a word about his actual rulings.

Nazi arguments are extremely lame.

Next?