Supreme Court Strikes Down Blatently Unconstitional Gun Regulation

[bigrebnc1775]

He's not projecting anything. Insomuch as he isn't projecting at all. He's just repeating things both sides say about politics. In this case, he wants to repeat everything the left says about gun control or Supreme Court opinions regarding gun rights.

He might be repeating what the left says but it's a projection of the left. Therefore he's projecting.

 

[Failzero]

Define "Leftism".

Mao Hitler ( Nationalist Socialist ) Stalin Pol Pot Maduro Castro ...

 

[miketx]

Guns don't kill people.

Supreme Courts beholden to the NRA kill people.

 

[Flash]

Leftism:

The idea that the constitution says what it doesn't say and doesn't say what it actually says.

These Moon Bats are just as confused about the Constitution as they are confused about Economics, History, Biology, Climate Science and Ethics.

 

[miketx]

Homos quoting commies.

 

[BlackSand]

Unless the Supreme Court is expanded, the U.S. as we knew it is over

.

If the only way Authoritarian Fascists can imagine continuing their constant assault on our Liberties is to expand the Supreme Court ...
Maybe they need to understand that the sun is setting on their Unconstitutional Empire.

.​

 

[TemplarKormac]

He might be repeating what the left says but it's a projection of the left. Therefore he's projecting.

Fair enough.

He projects everything, then.

 

[Failzero]

Homos quoting commies.

You just know KO has given a few reach arounds

 

[Failzero]

Mayor Adams is freakin “ These White mutha fuckas bein able to carry
Legally in The City is gonna keep me up at night “

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Define "Leftism".

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Mayor Adams is freakin “ These White mutha fuckas bein able to carry
Legally in The City is gonna keep me up at night “

Maybe she is a gangbanger

 

[basquebromance]

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Flash]

I love Liberal tears! So sweet!

 

[Flash]

This Democrat bitch is an insurrectionist saying she won't abide by the Constitution of the US.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Cry more. If cars could run on liberal tears, the price of gas now would be irrelevant.

"Cry more?? Maybe if you weren't self centered and have an ounce of empathy, you along with the other sociopaths might consider common sense gun controls.

The issue of guns, as well as abortion, taxes and Green Energy Systems are all wedge issues, the Republican Party is reactionary, and uses wedge issues to gain the votes of single voters tp gain power.

The Democratic Party is progressive, looking forward to the future, not the past. They know that guns kill innocent people every day, and our country has the most mass shootings of innocent people than any other developed nation.

The fact is, "shall not be infringed" is framed by ARMS. Not guns, per se. The Republicans,, solely to gain votes at the expense of horrific events, allowed the Brady Bill*** to sunset.

Of course this bill has loop holes, it was a start.

*** Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act - Wikipedia.

Did the assault weapons ban of 1994 bring down mass shootings? Here’s what the data tells us

Analysis of the 10 years in which the US banned sales of assault weapons shows that it correlates with a drop in mass shooting deaths – a trend that reversed as soon as the ban expired.

theconversation.com

In the latter of the links above are some examples that ARMS are weapons solely for War:

A spate of high-profile mass shootings in the U.S. has sparked calls for Congress to look at imposing a ban on so-called assault weapons – covering the types of guns used in both the recent Buffalo grocery attack and that on an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Such a prohibition has been in place before. As President Joe Biden noted in his June 2, 2022, speech addressing gun violence, almost three decades ago bipartisan support in Congress helped push through a federal assault weapons ban in 1994, as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

That ban was limited – it covered only certain categories of semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15s and applied to a ban on sales only after the act was signed into law, allowing people to keep hold of weapons purchased before that date. And it also had in it a so-called “sunset provision” that allowed the ban to expire in 2004.

A spate of high-profile mass shootings in the U.S. has sparked calls for Congress to look at imposing a ban on so-called assault weapons – covering the types of guns used in both the recent Buffalo grocery attack and that on an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Such a prohibition has been in place before. As President Joe Biden noted in his June 2, 2022, speech addressing gun violence, almost three decades ago bipartisan support in Congress helped push through a federal assault weapons ban in 1994, as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

That ban was limited – it covered only certain categories of semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15s and applied to a ban on sales only after the act was signed into law, allowing people to keep hold of weapons purchased before that date. And it also had in it a so-called “sunset provision” that allowed the ban to expire in 2004.

Nonetheless, the 10-year life span of that ban – with a clear beginning and end date – gives researchers the opportunity to compare what happened with mass shooting deaths before, during and after the prohibition was in place. Our group of injury epidemiologists and trauma surgeons did just that. In 2019, we published a population-based study analyzing the data in a bid to evaluate the effect that the federal ban on assault weapons had on mass shootings, defined by the FBI as a shooting with four or more fatalities, not including the shooter. Here’s what the data shows:

If the reader got this far, please open the link and see the chart that is posted after the colon in the last paragraph above.

 

[Weatherman2020]

SCOTUS = More guns & less woman's rights

I can’t wait until women aren’t allowed to win in sports.
Oh wait. We’re there thanks to you Leftards.

 

[Rye Catcher]

This Democrat bitch is an insurrectionist saying she won't abide by the Constitution of the US.

Excuse me, trump is the bitch who not only didn't abide by COTUS he attempted to destroy it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

"Cry more?? Maybe if you weren't self centered and have an ounce of empathy, you along with the other sociopaths might consider common sense gun controls.

The issue of guns, as well as abortion, taxes and Green Energy Systems are all wedge issues, the Republican Party is reactionary, and uses wedge issues to gain the votes of single voters tp gain power.

The Democratic Party is progressive, looking forward to the future, not the past. They know that guns kill innocent people every day, and our country has the most mass shootings of innocent people than any other developed nation.

The fact is, "shall not be infringed" is framed by ARMS. Not guns, per se. The Republicans,, solely to gain votes at the expense of horrific events, allowed the Brady Bill*** to sunset.

Of course this bill has loop holes, it was a start.

*** Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act - Wikipedia.

Did the assault weapons ban of 1994 bring down mass shootings? Here’s what the data tells us

Analysis of the 10 years in which the US banned sales of assault weapons shows that it correlates with a drop in mass shooting deaths – a trend that reversed as soon as the ban expired.

theconversation.com

In the latter of the links above are some examples that ARMS are weapons solely for War:

A spate of high-profile mass shootings in the U.S. has sparked calls for Congress to look at imposing a ban on so-called assault weapons – covering the types of guns used in both the recent Buffalo grocery attack and that on an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Such a prohibition has been in place before. As President Joe Biden noted in his June 2, 2022, speech addressing gun violence, almost three decades ago bipartisan support in Congress helped push through a federal assault weapons ban in 1994, as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

That ban was limited – it covered only certain categories of semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15s and applied to a ban on sales only after the act was signed into law, allowing people to keep hold of weapons purchased before that date. And it also had in it a so-called “sunset provision” that allowed the ban to expire in 2004.

A spate of high-profile mass shootings in the U.S. has sparked calls for Congress to look at imposing a ban on so-called assault weapons – covering the types of guns used in both the recent Buffalo grocery attack and that on an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.

Such a prohibition has been in place before. As President Joe Biden noted in his June 2, 2022, speech addressing gun violence, almost three decades ago bipartisan support in Congress helped push through a federal assault weapons ban in 1994, as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

That ban was limited – it covered only certain categories of semi-automatic weapons such as AR-15s and applied to a ban on sales only after the act was signed into law, allowing people to keep hold of weapons purchased before that date. And it also had in it a so-called “sunset provision” that allowed the ban to expire in 2004.

Nonetheless, the 10-year life span of that ban – with a clear beginning and end date – gives researchers the opportunity to compare what happened with mass shooting deaths before, during and after the prohibition was in place. Our group of injury epidemiologists and trauma surgeons did just that. In 2019, we published a population-based study analyzing the data in a bid to evaluate the effect that the federal ban on assault weapons had on mass shootings, defined by the FBI as a shooting with four or more fatalities, not including the shooter. Here’s what the data shows:

If the reader got this far, please open the link and see the chart that is posted after the colon in the last paragraph above.

All wedge issues that an overwhelming majority of Americans side with me on.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Excuse me, trump is the bitch who not only didn't abide by COTUS he attempted to destroy it.

I drink your tears like a fine wine.