Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get that you think it’s urgent because the election. I don’t see the law or the case law, that says that if one side really wants to win an election, that constitutes urgency in a criminal case.
But I haven’t really researched that point. What have you found about it?
The right to a speedy trial is not just for the defendant, but also for the victims..... Justice delayed, is justice denied.The right to a speedy trial is for the defendant, not frothing at the mouth Dimwingers hoping to lock up Tater’s rival before the election.
Sorry, it is for the defendant.The right to a speedy trial is not just for the defendant, but also for the victims..... Justice delayed, is justice denied.
Haha, facts from trumplandia...Just the facts....sing along now with your fellow idiots
Run out what clock?I'm on the side of Trump having his day in court like anyone else, instead of being enabled by a hyper partisan SC acts to run out the clock and remain above the law.
You are saying the quiet part out loud. I'm surprised your fellow Dems are not PM'ing you to cut it out.The hurry is in extrodinary situation where we have DOJ guidelines that a sitting president can't be prosecuted and a defendant that may become a president before his ongoing criminal cases are resolved.
There is OBVIOSLY a limited time frame in play which justifies high priority. How can you possibly say there isn't?
I think you might be getting more upset than you should. I recommend saying only "agree to disagree" in your next reply and taking a break from the forum. If you say that, I will let you have the last word, so you can relax a bit.Don't know what the fuck is wrong with you to want to be on the other side. If you had any real conviction that Trump is innocent then you wouldn't be supporting this.
Run out what clock?
So should Trump.Nixon should have hanged.
Glad you admit if Biden’s DOJ can’t lock Trump up he will win in November.How many times I have to explain the same thing?
DOJ policy is that a sitting president can't be prosecuted.
And thats aside from Trump simply corruptly firing his prosecutors or pardoning himself, which he of course will do if needed.
I may be wrong but DOJ policy refers to a SITTING POTUS. Last I heard Trump was a private citizen running for POTUS.There will still be time for a summer trial even after the April hearing and decision.
It will just mean that the DOJ's longstanding tradition of not holding trials like this so close to an election has to be suspended.
Of course the Trump camp will scream bloody murder about "election interference," but oh well....that has been their plan all along anyway.
Trump has already referred in a Truth Social post to the "DOJ "law" about trials in election years" but he's a dumbass.
There's no "law" about this. It is only commonly accepted practice, but this is an extroardinary case.
Extaordinary measures and practices are called for.
And at the end of the day it isn't The DOJ's fault that ALL of Trump's trials are going to be stacked up right next to the election....from May till November now.
That was Trump's decision.
The likely effect of his criminal Trials all being delayed until so late in the year and so close to the election is that voters are going to be so fatigued by constant, daily news of Trump's courtroom details and all the evidence against him they are hearing they're liable to cast votes to ensure they NEVER have to hear his stupid name again.
So look on the bright side.
The SCOTUS waiting so long to shoot down his immunity argument just may turn out to be a real gift to America.
Why the hell would you want a criminal in the White House?It is very possible that Trump may be technically guilty of some of the dozens of crimes with which he is charged.
I didn't know that DOJ was the judge & jury.Glad you admit if Biden’s DOJ can’t lock Trump up he will win in November.
You should just post the first three words of that post for all your posts, Simp.I didn't know that DOJ was the judge & jury.
Wil you be in N.Y. next month for Trump's daily pity party during his trial hoping for a good whiff when he soils himself?You should just post the first three words of that post for all your posts, Simp.
Some of the dumbest nonsense I've heard.No I'm not, I already made it clear, but I'll say it again, cuz you're slow. Probably slow on the courts too.
A. When maggots make shit up, such as to weaponize the justice system to throw a POTUS election in their favor, the accused should use EVERYTHING at their disposal to fight those maggots off. Trump's team is doing exactly that.
B. I suspect the SCOTUS will rule Trump's not immune to your poison.
C. Then Trump will receive the antidote in court, because there's no way in fuck this insurrection business will stick anywhere beyond inside that tiny head of yours, and those like it.
Clear enough?
Agreed. Libtards trying to delegitimize the Supreme Court. So what else is new.That is your whole post....nothing but talking points
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Prosecutors who bring these charges put their careers on the line.
And I'll explain it to you as many times as needed: DOJ policy is not law, though they act like it is when questioned by Congress. They could change their policy anytime.How many times I have to explain the same thing?
DOJ policy is that a sitting president can't be prosecuted.
And thats aside from Trump simply corruptly firing his prosecutors or pardoning himself, which he of course will do if needed.
Everyone is a "criminal" by that standard of being technically guilty of some obscure crime that no one is ever prosectuted for.Why the hell would you want a criminal in the White House?
Having his trial rushed due to an election is NOT being treated "like anyone else."If he commited crimes he should stand trial for it like anyone else instead of floating above law. Why do you keep arguing for enabling lawlessness and corruption?
Well, we certainly know that Democrats have been thumbing the scale for over six years now.Conservative SC majority is now shedding any pretence still left to partisan impartiality.
Trump has little to stand on in his criminal trials, so his only end game is delaying them long enough to again make it to the White House and put himself above the law.
Nobody seriously thinks SC is going to grant Trump immunity, nobody thinks they will overturn iron-clad lower court ruling....but we have a Supreme Court that seems to be willing to use that excuse to play along and halt Trump's criminal trials for months, making it near impossible from them to complete before election.
It's been 135 days since Jack Smith asked the court to expedite descision on immunuty...nope! They insist on taking no less than 5 months to settle an obvious no-brainer outcome.
Even if there was some argument about how busy they are or how complex of case this is, they still didn't have to do it this way. SC could have simply allowed the trials to go on, while they square away these go-nowhere immunity claims.
In Taking Up Trump’s Immunity Claim, Supreme Court Bolstered His Delay Strategy
By scheduling a hearing for late April on the former president’s assertion that he cannot be prosecuted for his actions in office, the justices increased the chances that he will not face trial by Election Day.www.nytimes.com
We knew Thomas was an unrepentant Trumptard and Alito is not far behind, but for the rest to go along with this ridiculous shit?
This marks a whole new low for Supreme Court, whole new level of partisanship and this is not going to end well.
