Sweeping new vaccine mandates for 100 million Americans

I think he should have mandated HCl injections but only for democrats.

Show me even one ICU filled with covid cases. Moron, there aren't any--Every one of these whining hospitals are complaining that they don't have room for elective procedures--you stupid fuckers only hear what you want to hear.
Crock-o-Meter.jpg

That really set off the Crock-o-Meter

Click on this link and pick a hospital or state......https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-near-you.html
 
View attachment 537235
That really set off the Crock-o-Meter

Click on this link and pick a hospital or state......https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-hospitals-near-you.html
Two things, moron. First, you know how to attach files--kudos. Second, maybe you should learn how to insert a working link Oh, and BTW, NYT is about the furthest thing-short of CNN--from a reputable news source. Run along now, adults are talking.
 
Doe
This is what sound, responsible governance looks like – missing during the last administration.

And the requirement is perfectly appropriate, warranted, lawful and Constitutional.
Does that mean you would have been ok with Trump mandating the use of hydrocloriquine last year?
 
Two things, moron. First, you know how to attach files--kudos. Second, maybe you should learn how to insert a working link Oh, and BTW, NYT is about the furthest thing-short of CNN--from a reputable news source. Run along now, adults are talking.
So what exactly is reputable news source... is it... PutYourHeadUpYourASS.com or BullshitNews.org or Fox News?
 
Come on sir, when the government is trying to shove this down your throat with incentives and then saying you either get it or you starve, another agenda is in the works and not public health.
You sound paranoid... have you seen a psychiatrist recently??
 
Please be honest with yourself. There have been two vaccines and a booster that have NOT done what they have been touted to do. They DO NOT provide immunity. They DO NOT prevent the spread of this scamdemic. There is nothing on the horizon that will. And they DO NOT know what long term effects are possible as a result of inoculation. Yep, that is experimental.
Amazing…and yet those “ineffective” vaccines have managed to keep most of the vaccinated out of the hospitals and morgues. Imagine that!
 
Amazing…and yet those “ineffective” vaccines have managed to keep most of the vaccinated out of the hospitals and morgues. Imagine that!

And yet those "effective" vaccines have managed to allow people to not only continue to contract covid, but spread it as well.

How effective!

I thought Kumalot Harris told us the vaccines were not safe? So you're saying you love the Trump vaccines and Kumalot Harris was wrong?
 
This is what sound, responsible governance looks like – missing during the last administration.

And the requirement is perfectly appropriate, warranted, lawful and Constitutional.
Nope... This is what totalitarianism looks like...

That's alright....it ain't never gonna happen.

Jo
 
Amazing…and yet those “ineffective” vaccines have managed to keep most of the vaccinated out of the hospitals and morgues. Imagine that!
Do they contract the disease? Do they spread the disease? Yep, that is pretty much the definition of INEFFECTIVE. Effective vaccines defeat the target--i.e. Smallpox, Polio. As for keeping the hospitals empty--how's that working. According to your demented heeero, we have reached the 70% vax rate that by HIS admission would mean reaching herd immunity and opening up to normal--how's that working for you?
 
US Supreme Court might step in on this. I don't see it holding up in court.



Then you are either stupid or just don't pay attention to what happens in our nation.

The following case was ruled on by the Supreme Court in 1905. Read the link:


Then there's this case which the appeals court ruled on August 4th just over a month ago.


Their ruling was based in part on the Jacobson V Massachusetts case ruled by the supreme court in 1905.

The Supreme Court on August 14th, not quite a month ago, refused to take up the case based on the ruling in 1905.


You can't be more wrong if you tried.
 
Not that would be the Republicans who want their Orange turd SUPREME Premier to be dictator...

That's why the GOP attempted an insurrection on January 6th in DC... don't you remember?
Creepy Joe is acting just like a dictator and you're defending him
 
Then you are either stupid or just don't pay attention to what happens in our nation.

The following case was ruled on by the Supreme Court in 1905. Read the link:


Then there's this case which the appeals court ruled on August 4th just over a month ago.


Their ruling was based in part on the Jacobson V Massachusetts case ruled by the supreme court in 1905.

The Supreme Court on August 14th, not quite a month ago, refused to take up the case based on the ruling in 1905.


You can't be more wrong if you tried.
Interesting, thankyou for bringing the information up. My question now is how long is the police power of the state last? Or can it go on forever and be legal as long as they have decided it is the publics best interest.
 

Forum List

Back
Top