Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
So prosecute Trump for having classified documents but not Brandon.I, also go with option 3. Throw out the entire Hur Confidential () as a partisan hack job. In his interview with Biden Hur said Biden appeared “to have a photographic understanding and recall.”, though this never got into the final report, as didn't suit the Republican narrative. Hur impugned himself and the report by leaving that out.
So prosecute Trump for having classified documents but not Brandon.
Fascists pull that crap.
Smart move by Hur. You don't want to commit to charges you don't think a jury will convict on.Biden “willfully retained and disclosed classified materials,” but that a jury would be sensitive to an “elderly man with a poor memory.” The president “did not remember when he was vice president.”
I don't care, the Ghostwriter then tried to hide, and destroy the evidence, you people trying to cover for Biden then turn around and throw Trump under the bus for less.And not pressing charges for this is explained in the early pages...like page 4-6 or 7.
That isn't what Hur determined.I don't care, the Ghostwriter then tried to hide, and destroy the evidence, you people trying to cover for Biden then turn around and throw Trump under the bus for less.
He tried to destroy them i listened to Hur's testimony!That isn't what Hur determined.
"ghostwriter kept, and did not delete or attempt to delete, his near-verbatim transcripts of the recordings and produced those transcripts to us, including for each of the incomplete recovered files. \Ve considered whether to charge the ghostwriter with obstruction of justice, but we believe the evidence would be insufficient to obtain a conviction and therefore declined to prosecute him. While the ghostwriter admitted that he deleted the recordings after he learned of the special counsel's investigation, the evidence falls
short of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to impede an investigation, which is the intent required by law. In his interviews, the ghostwriter offered plausible, innocent reasons for why he deleted the recordings."
Perhaps you should get your info from the report instead of relying on the media to tell you what they think it means?
Their is nothing to cover. Hur decided not to file charges and I am simply reiterating what is in the report.
Why are you talking about Trump?
Right but again Hur determined not to press charges because he determined nothing was deleted with the intent to thwart the investigation.He tried to destroy them i listened to Hur's testimony!
Of course it was done to thwart the investigation he just can't prove intent. My gosh are you actually this stupid, he deleted them when he heard about the counsel was that a coincidence?Right but again Hur determined not to press charges because he determined nothing was deleted with the intent to thwart the investigation.
Again, this is from the actual report, not from the media.
Intent is required. He can't prove intent then he can't prove a crime was committed.Of course it was done to thwart the investigation he just can't prove intent. My gosh are you actually this stupid, he deleted them when he heard about the counsel was that a coincidence?
So Biden didn't intend to remove the classified materials? It was all done without his knowledge?That means Biden didn't break the law because intent is required.
Oh sure. Almost every President forgets when he was in office...Some people forget when they are president. It's common to get dates wrong.
Not sure the details.So Biden didn't intend to remove the classified materials? It was all done without his knowledge?
The former president did.Oh sure. Almost every President forgets when he was in office...
It's not intent to commit the crime- it's intent to commit the act that is illegal.Intent is required. He can't prove intent then he can't prove a crime was committed.
That is how it works.
More pretzel twisting from the demented LEFTIntent is required. He can't prove intent then he can't prove a crime was committed.
That is how it works.
Pretzel twisting?More pretzel twisting from the demented LEFT
LMAO keep spin failing.Yes, because he didn't think he could prove intent.
That means Biden didn't break the law because intent is required.
You forgot the 3rd option...What say you?
1) Biden's memory is so bad he wasn't charged w/ illegally keeping classified info as a private citizen
2) Biden's memory is fine & he should be charged for willfully keeping of classified info as a private citizen
It’s an either/or decision. Binary, no option 3.
Things Just Got a Lot Worse for Joe Biden
pjmedia.com
SENATOR Biden INTENTIONALLY STOLE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS.Pretzel twisting?
Intent is required. It is stated in the report.
No twisting is required.
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were good at propaganda too. You must be proud.You forgot the 3rd option...
3) I am a lefty, we have the media on our side, Republicans never organize enough to cause action... so I don't have to care
