Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage


Here are the names of every Republican representative who opposed federal protections for gay marriage:


Good for them. And shame on the pervert-loving filth who have supported this disgusting mockery of marriage.
 
No
Well , well, 24 hours and no response. Good! You are finished here .
No, I just had other things to do.

But, at the expense of just rehashing all this over and over, what's the point? I simply disagree with you, I don't believe states will return to banning gay marriage, you do. So....where would you like to go?
 
This time. Kim Davis did not have standing. Next time it may well be different. What the fuck is wrong with you??
Nah, the 2 that dissented actually sided with those who rejected it, for "technical" reasons, or whatever. Point is, even if they had dissented completely, it still would have been rejected because the rest of the court didn't agree.

Nothing is wrong with me...what is wrong with you? Why do you want to keep living in this world of fear?
 
IN the news today:

So, he didn't say he would ban gay marriage, he said that CURRENT law bans gay marriage, and he would follow the law WHATEVER IT IS. so that means if the state repeals the gay marriage ban, he will follow that law. But, again, good luck finding anyone that will actually enforce it.

So, get back to me IF obergefell is ever repealed, AND if you see states start refusing gay marriage, then I will admit I was wrong.
 

Here are the names of every Republican representative who opposed federal protections for gay marriage:
I'm not going to go back and watch the speeches of each of those senators to find out why they voted it down, but I'll take a guess that it was because the bill is written to overrule states rights.

Rubio said this: "it is unnecessary, there are other priorities, and this is an issue he’s always believed should be handled by the states."

And Cruz said this: "The way the Constitution set up for you to advance that position is convince your fellow citizens that if you succeeded in convincing your fellow citizens, then your state would change the laws to reflect those views. In Obergefell, the court said, 'No, we know better than you guys do, and now every state must, must sanction and permit gay marriage,'” Cruz continued"

So, I'm sure you have all the links, did any of those that voted against it say they did so because they didn't think gay marriage should be legal, at all, or did they all cite states rights?

Look, I'm not denying that there ARE people against gay marriage, I don't think they will prevail in their efforts.
 
No

No, I just had other things to do.

But, at the expense of just rehashing all this over and over, what's the point? I simply disagree with you, I don't believe states will return to banning gay marriage, you do. So....where would you like to go?
Keep reading fool!
 
Nah, the 2 that dissented actually sided with those who rejected it, for "technical" reasons, or whatever. Point is, even if they had dissented completely, it still would have been rejected because the rest of the court didn't agree.

Nothing is wrong with me...what is wrong with you? Why do you want to keep living in this world of fear?
Holy fucking shit! Do you not understand that if they found that the plaintif had standing, there would have been a good chance that tree more Justices would have agreed with Thomas and Scalia-and that was before Barrot was on the court. The world is a fearsome place
 
So, he didn't say he would ban gay marriage, he said that CURRENT law bans gay marriage, and he would follow the law WHATEVER IT IS. so that means if the state repeals the gay marriage ban, he will follow that law. But, again, good luck finding anyone that will actually enforce it.

So, get back to me IF obergefell is ever repealed, AND if you see states start refusing gay marriage, then I will admit I was wrong.
Give it a fucking rest. You know damned well what would happen if Obgefell were to be overturned. Once again, I am not sure if you are just playing a sick game or if you are really just that stupid
 
I'm not going to go back and watch the speeches of each of those senators to find out why they voted it down, but I'll take a guess that it was because the bill is written to overrule states rights.

Rubio said this: "it is unnecessary, there are other priorities, and this is an issue he’s always believed should be handled by the states."

And Cruz said this: "The way the Constitution set up for you to advance that position is convince your fellow citizens that if you succeeded in convincing your fellow citizens, then your state would change the laws to reflect those views. In Obergefell, the court said, 'No, we know better than you guys do, and now every state must, must sanction and permit gay marriage,'” Cruz continued"

So, I'm sure you have all the links, did any of those that voted against it say they did so because they didn't think gay marriage should be legal, at all, or did they all cite states rights?

Look, I'm not denying that there ARE people against gay marriage, I don't think they will prevail in their efforts.
Yes, yes. You keep bleating about states rights while ignoring individual righs to due process and equal protection under that law. More and more, it is becomming apparent that you are full of shit when you claim to support gay rights and marriage equality. And, it hardly matters why they voted against the bill, the fact is that you and they are cut from the same mold
 
Holy fucking shit! Do you not understand that if they found that the plaintif had standing, there would have been a good chance that tree more Justices would have agreed with Thomas and Scalia-and that was before Barrot was on the court. The world is a fearsome place
But she didn't have standing..I mean, sure we could "what if" this all day, they found she didn't have standing and they all rejected it. The system worked.
 
Give it a fucking rest. You know damned well what would happen if Obgefell were to be overturned. Once again, I am not sure if you are just playing a sick game or if you are really just that stupid
You're right, I don't KNOW what would happen, and neither do you. I just don't believe it will ever happen.
 
Yes, yes. You keep bleating about states rights while ignoring individual righs to due process and equal protection under that law. More and more, it is becomming apparent that you are full of shit when you claim to support gay rights and marriage equality. And, it hardly matters why they voted against the bill, the fact is that you and they are cut from the same mold
I am for the cotus and adherence to it. I don't believe that the federal government has the right to make laws for or against gay marriage. Those rights are for the states, and the people more than they are for the federal gov. I believe that freedom means you should have the right to love and marry whomever you want and that no laws against it should be made.on religious grounds, because freedom OF religion also includes freedom FROM religion.

I don't agree that states should outlaw gay marriage, and I don't think they will, but that is for the people of that state to decide, and if necessary, take to scotus on a 14A basis. I believe if the people of the state decide they want gay marriage to be legal, they should make sure their elected officials vote that way.

I just simply do not believe that the federal gov has the right to make laws about this, and I think scotus shouldn't make rulings on a general basis because of what you all did to roe. I'm sorry, the courts do not make law, that is not their job. Yes, they can protect people's rights, and I'm for that.

I just disagree with your assertion that the courts can make laws, and that the federal gov has the right to run roughshod over states rights.

I've asked this before, and I don't know if I ever got an answer, bit, what does stated rights mean to you? How do you view the relationship of the power of the state vs power of the federal gov?
 

Forum List

Back
Top