Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Juvenile detention?He’s not in a jail
State the statute asswipe . I think the ten guy’s chasing him created the situation. How did you miss that? Hmm odd you didn’t even watch the videosIllinois residents who are minors are not allowed to borrow assault rifles and confront rioters in Wisconsin. He created the situation where as he had to murder two people.He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
Actually, I think they are.Illinois residents who are minors are not allowed to borrow assault rifles and confront rioters in Wisconsin. He created the situation where as he had to murder two people.He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
The black lives white guys? You’re fking right. They got taught a very serious lesson, it isn’t their cityWhat's the shame?It's a shame he's saddled with a Trumpster attorney. He actually has a good defense in going after the fuckers who organized the militia "outing". They are culpable for sending an armed minor into a riot. What the fuck were they thinking? That's why Trump sent his guy in there - to avoid charging the militia (and the cops who helped them) and keep on good terms with the rednecks, even if it means throwing the kid under the bus.
The shame is that the motherfuckers responsible for the whole mess - the militia goons and the LEOs that helped them - won't see justice.
Are you saying he was on his way to work? That his work required him to borrow an assault rifle? And that work was in the middle of a riot. And that he was allowed to break the emergency curfew?Are you saying people do not have the right to go to work in another state?
The dead perps are the ones responsible, shit for brains. They got what they had coming.What's the shame?It's a shame he's saddled with a Trumpster attorney. He actually has a good defense in going after the fuckers who organized the militia "outing". They are culpable for sending an armed minor into a riot. What the fuck were they thinking? That's why Trump sent his guy in there - to avoid charging the militia (and the cops who helped them) and keep on good terms with the rednecks, even if it means throwing the kid under the bus.
The shame is that the motherfuckers responsible for the whole mess - the militia goons and the LEOs that helped them - won't see justice.
And you are clueless-----being audited is not a sign of wrong doing. In fact, it very common in businesses especially in ones that don't pay off the right politicians----like the dems Bezos Buffet and others.He’s giving his entire salary, you?
that's right.
like donny.
LOL!!!!
if donny isn't lying about his wealth, he makes more than a prez's salary in interest alone ... so he wouldn't miss it. i do give to charity...
lots of them. & the ones i give to, have never been shut down due to fraud.
oh & i pay my taxes, have never been audited, & am not under investigation for bank & insurance fraud either.
Looks like they were. Even attacked himHe was not hunting, unless of course, rioters are, "in season"."(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593"
(Kyle is 17, so not applicable.)
Al sharptonAnd you are clueless-----being audited is not a sign of wrong doing. In fact, it very common in businesses especially in ones that don't pay off the right politicians----like the dems Bezos Buffet and others.He’s giving his entire salary, you?
that's right.
like donny.
LOL!!!!
if donny isn't lying about his wealth, he makes more than a prez's salary in interest alone ... so he wouldn't miss it. i do give to charity...
lots of them. & the ones i give to, have never been shut down due to fraud.
oh & i pay my taxes, have never been audited, & am not under investigation for bank & insurance fraud either.
Hmmmmm . . . . no, that isn't what he said. Why don't you read it again and tell us where you see any of what you claim.Are you saying he was on his way to work? That his work required him to borrow an assault rifle? And that work was in the middle of a riot. And that he was allowed to break the emergency curfew?Are you saying people do not have the right to go to work in another state?
Isn’t jail sweet pussJuvenile detention?He’s not in a jail
Rittenhouse, of Antioch, Illinois, was arrested at 5 a.m. on Wednesday and is being held without bail in the juvenile detention facility until a Friday hearing on whether to extradite him to Kenosha County.3 days ago
Jacob Blake: Kyle Rittenhouse charged with six criminal counts
He went to Kenosha. Is that not allowed by you?Are you saying he was on his way to work? That his work required him to borrow an assault rifle? And that work was in the middle of a riot. And that he was allowed to break the emergency curfew?Are you saying people do not have the right to go to work in another state?
Their intention was not legal. It's not legal to use lethal force to protect someone else's property.Moron, I responded to you pointing out the RWers prevented the destruction of property. Not to any of them being personally attacked. Try harder to focus."It worked. The mob did not attack and destroy the property they were defending."Rittenhouse did not do that. 17 year old Rittenhouse left his mother's apartment in Illinois, crossed the Wisconsin border, obtained a dangerous weapon from, "a friend". He then went into a riot prepared to use the deadly weapon.It is not wrong to leave your house with your gun, nor to go to a public place and stand there.
There are so many details missing from this story. It will be interesting to find them all out.
Rittenhouse also dropped out of High School, he certainly was not the smartest 17 year old.
It is not wrong to leave your friends apartment with your favorite gun and to to a public place and stand there.
He went to the "mostly peaceful protest" to use the gun in it's intended fashion, ie to use it's presence to deter aggression.
It worked. The mob did not attack and destroy the property they were defending.
Unfortunately, the police forced this lone teenager to be stranded by himself in a mob controlled war zone and he was attacked by the mob.
The law does not allow lethal force to protect property you neither own nor operate.
It does allow you to stand there and defend yourself if attacked.
And it worked. They stood there, and the mob saw them and was deterred.
If you consider that behavior against the law, you should contact the local police and demand they issue warrants against the people that had guns and stood there.
Now, you will pretend to be too stupid to understand that you were talking about his and his group's intention, and not what happened with him, when the police forced him away from his group.
As far as the initial attack on Rittenhouse, self defense laws are intended to allow someone to neutralize an imminent threat, up to lethal force if necessary. It's not a license to kill. The teen terrorist neutralized that threat with his first shot. Every shot after that was intended to kill the guy trying to take his gun from him.
1. The intention and actual action of the group was legal and it worked. No one is talking about tracking them down and arresting them for their actions.
2. Are you admitting that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense?
3. We don't know the results of the autopsy yet. Those other wounds could be friendly fire.
4. And a person in a life or death self defense situation, is giving some lee way, for the "pucker factor" "in the presence of an raised knife".
Electra believes there is some clause in the law that says you can possess a rifle only while hunting, however that is definedState the statute asswipe . I think the ten guy’s chasing him created the situation. How did you miss that? Hmm odd you didn’t even watch the videosIllinois residents who are minors are not allowed to borrow assault rifles and confront rioters in Wisconsin. He created the situation where as he had to murder two people.He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
Ahh, so he had a DR-15, not an AR-15. Thanks for clarifying that.it was a defense rifle not an assault rifle you dumbass,,,No kidding, one trail of maybe many more to come. Now the boy sits in jail, pondering why he was so stupid as to get himself charged with murder.It’s trial stupid
You think you out to do the same thing, get on a plane and go to riot, first of course finding an assault rifle to take with you?
That's bullshit. The law doesn't second guess how many shots were required after you have been assaulted. You are entitled to keep shooting until your assailant stops moving.Their intention was not legal. It's not legal to use lethal force to protect someone else's property.Moron, I responded to you pointing out the RWers prevented the destruction of property. Not to any of them being personally attacked. Try harder to focus."It worked. The mob did not attack and destroy the property they were defending."Rittenhouse did not do that. 17 year old Rittenhouse left his mother's apartment in Illinois, crossed the Wisconsin border, obtained a dangerous weapon from, "a friend". He then went into a riot prepared to use the deadly weapon.It is not wrong to leave your house with your gun, nor to go to a public place and stand there.
There are so many details missing from this story. It will be interesting to find them all out.
Rittenhouse also dropped out of High School, he certainly was not the smartest 17 year old.
It is not wrong to leave your friends apartment with your favorite gun and to to a public place and stand there.
He went to the "mostly peaceful protest" to use the gun in it's intended fashion, ie to use it's presence to deter aggression.
It worked. The mob did not attack and destroy the property they were defending.
Unfortunately, the police forced this lone teenager to be stranded by himself in a mob controlled war zone and he was attacked by the mob.
The law does not allow lethal force to protect property you neither own nor operate.
It does allow you to stand there and defend yourself if attacked.
And it worked. They stood there, and the mob saw them and was deterred.
If you consider that behavior against the law, you should contact the local police and demand they issue warrants against the people that had guns and stood there.
Now, you will pretend to be too stupid to understand that you were talking about his and his group's intention, and not what happened with him, when the police forced him away from his group.
As far as the initial attack on Rittenhouse, self defense laws are intended to allow someone to neutralize an imminent threat, up to lethal force if necessary. It's not a license to kill. The teen terrorist neutralized that threat with his first shot. Every shot after that was intended to kill the guy trying to take his gun from him.
1. The intention and actual action of the group was legal and it worked. No one is talking about tracking them down and arresting them for their actions.
2. Are you admitting that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense?
3. We don't know the results of the autopsy yet. Those other wounds could be friendly fire.
4. And a person in a life or death self defense situation, is giving some lee way, for the "pucker factor" "in the presence of an raised knife".
As far as the teen murderer, I have no doubt he acted in self defense. But his intent veered from self defense to reckless homicide after he continued shooting his victim after neutralizing him. There's also the possibility he was not legally allowed to be in possession of any firearm and by violating that law, he can't claim self defense.
The dead perps are the ones responsible, shit for brains. The got what they had coming.What's the shame?It's a shame he's saddled with a Trumpster attorney. He actually has a good defense in going after the fuckers who organized the militia "outing". They are culpable for sending an armed minor into a riot. What the fuck were they thinking? That's why Trump sent his guy in there - to avoid charging the militia (and the cops who helped them) and keep on good terms with the rednecks, even if it means throwing the kid under the bus.
The shame is that the motherfuckers responsible for the whole mess - the militia goons and the LEOs that helped them - won't see justice.
Yes, they're allowed to carry to/from hunting or to/from classes. He was doing neither, fucking moron.Hunters are allowed to carry their guns other places beside the spot where they actually kill something, moron.He was not hunting, unless of course, rioters are, "in season"."(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593"
(Kyle is 17, so not applicable.)
Honey, there isn't a crow bar big enough in the world to get your head pulled out of your behind to listen to facts and reason. You are like a child who covers their ears and screams. You need to grow up. Trayvon was a thief--he was casing the neighborhood----and poor dem zimmerman was attacked for having a white sounding name and trying to protect his neighborhood. Then he was railroaded because it scored Obama and his crew of communist marxist morons political points by motivating the weak minded want-to-be victims to vote and vote illegally. Such stupid tools---who keep covering their ears and screaming.What do you think druggy thief Trayvon was doing in the rain that day? Zimmerman saw the thief peeking into peoples homes and enclosed areas as per his phone call to the police dispatch before trayvon got himself killed.Yes we do---------he was a criminal and his suspicious behavior of peeking into peoples homes and yards out in the rain is what caught zimmerman (who is part black btw) attention. Again, casing is very noticeable and suspicious. Trayvon was a violent druggy stealing criminal---as such he was suspicious and got snagged.How dare he call the cops on a druggy thief and a guy with a history of attacking other people. It is all zimmermans fault for daring to care about his community and try to stop the violent criminals which trayvon absolutely was.That's called "provocation with intent", and it's illegal.Speaking of which, I think there's a playbook forming on how to murder.
1. Instigate someone.
2. Wait for them to attack you.
3. Shoot them.
Make sure you tell George Zimmerman.
PUll your head out of the sand and get a clue...buy a vowel if you have to.
Martin wasn’t doing anything wrong.
Call the cops and leave it alone. Let them handle it. We don't need pretend cops instigating problems that leave other people dead.
Bull chit--------------he was casing the neighborhood peeking into homes and their fenced areas to break in at a later date. He was snagged with stolen jewelry and a burglary kit.......criminals casing homes to rob do look suspicious. And fyi, he had no money and no job and his dad was a dead beat so he had no other means but to rob to get his drug money. Wanna play some more? Want talk about where he got the guns he was pictured with or the drugs he was also pictured with?
Bullshit.
You have no proof that he was casing the neighborhood.
You keep saying that yet you still don't have proof of it.
Wanna say it some more? That's cool. It still won't be proof.
Still not proof.
Not if he was in the commission of a crime himself.The law states he must be hunting.Not if it's a shotgun or long gun, moron. This law has already been discussed ad nauseum.
Either way, it is not self-defense to cross state borders, take an assault rifle from somebody, then to go to a riot to attempt to enforce peace, as a minor.
He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
