Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

Status
Not open for further replies.
You wish it was "blowing up in our faces".
The only thing blowing up in anyone's face is the Democratic party who have been praising/financing/protecting the mobs running around burning down buildings/looting/vandalizing and harassing passerby's.
Your stupid virtue signaling is coming around full circle... you only hope this one kid can turn it back around. That's funny

Sorry, bud...


 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
 
Point is. You are an enemy. You are a communist democrat enemy which is everything you do.

Sorry, some sad old homophobe upset the world has passed her by doesn't impress me.

Most Americans support police reform. This attrocity in Kenosha doesn't help matters much.
 
All I wrote was that there were witness accounts and a video. It doesn‘t help his case that he absconded and fled the scene of the crime. Fleeing is evidence of guilt. There will be no dispute that he shot those individuals either. He is entitled to a jury of his peers. All I did was point out the evidence. The evidence against him looks strong.
"Fleeing is evidence of guilt"... well then... wasn't the man who was shot by police "fleeing".... so then he was also guilty?
 
From the video he looked to be surrounded by other kids. So the other shooter was probably also a kid.
This is the kind of thing that develops in lawlessness. How many were wounded and killed again in the "autonomous zone"?
You notice, of course, those calling for the swift punishment for this kid, wasn't exactly so excited by the other 35 killed due to riots?

The other 35, there wasn't any question... if you were arrested killing someone in a riot, you'll be prosecuted.

This case, the police walked right by the militia when they were wandering around brandishing guns, and let this kid get away.

Contrasting how the KPD treated this kid vs. how they treated Jacob Blake, it's not a great comparison.
 
Fleeing is evidence of guilt"... well then... wasn't the man who was shot by police "fleeing".... so then he was also guilty?

There's a difference between checking on your kids in a car and fleeing 22 miles to escape detection...

Really, contrasting White Privilege Rittenhouse and Blake is not going to go well for you guys.
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,
 
Just STFU you racist lying POS. Police are not shooting people in the street. Though people like you may well deserve it.

Woooo, getting a little upset, are we?

Hey, came out today that the Kenosha Police Department knew this militia group was on the street with guns in violation of curfew and not only ignored them, but dropped off some water. I mean, I know it was a bit warm, we're in the middle of a heat wave in the Greater Chicago Area, but we wouldn't want these poor WHITE boys to get thirsty when they are plotting murder and mayhem.
But you have no problem with people supplying rioters with food and water. Upset? Yes. Upset that assholes like you spread your BS about the police while you’re a lazy bigot who can’t hold down a job. Go ahead, let an angry mob chase you and start beating your ass. You better lay there and take it.
 
From the video he looked to be surrounded by other kids. So the other shooter was probably also a kid.
This is the kind of thing that develops in lawlessness. How many were wounded and killed again in the "autonomous zone"?
You notice, of course, those calling for the swift punishment for this kid, wasn't exactly so excited by the other 35 killed due to riots?

The other 35, there wasn't any question... if you were arrested killing someone in a riot, you'll be prosecuted.

This case, the police walked right by the militia when they were wandering around brandishing guns, and let this kid get away.

Contrasting how the KPD treated this kid vs. how they treated Jacob Blake, it's not a great comparison.
Well then... we should all get together and break into some businesses!! We can get all kinds of stuff for our outrage!! Then we can sit back and watch the place burn down!! Great fun!.... wait...what are we outraged about again?.... oh well not important.
 
What law did he break
Probably some law involving shooting people.

We have those, you know.
You mean there is a law against murder? Since when?
Do we have no right to defend our selves?
Everyone has a right to defend themselves. The defense has to be proportionate to the threat. A vigilante will have a hard time proving self-defense. Hell, the video shows the shooter tripping and then appearing to shoot randomly from a sitting position. That evidence will be his kiss of death.
 
Last edited:
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Gun rights have nothing to do with economic policy....


There are two axis. Social and economic

Actual economic marxists don't exist in america. And social marxists don't either in any numbers

To be a social marxist you'd need to support chinese style authoritarianism. Wanting state enforced equal outcomes for all demographics isn't enough.
 
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
He looks like one of those INCEL characters.

You know, I kinda thought the same thing. Especially when I saw that he was wearing Crocs. What kind of a gun owner would have a picture of them with their gun, wearing the most pussified type of footwear?

Quick question for you gun owners out there, would you be willing to have your picture taken of you holding your gun and wearing Crocs? Better question still, would any of you guys even own Crocs?

Obviously by my avatar, I have no problem being photoed with my gun. :auiqs.jpg:

Whether or not you would have a picture taken with your gun wasn't quite the question. The question is, would you have that picture taken while wearing Crocs? The follow up question to that was how many of you gun owners actually own Crocs?

That I couldn't tell you. To be totally honest, I didn't know what crocs were until this topic. This is a kid after all. When I was a kid, I wore an army jacket, tie died tee shirts, bell bottom jeans, and had hair down to my shoulders. my mother made me an elastic band for my bike to tie up my bell bottoms because they kept getting caught between the bike chain and sprockets. When the family breaks out the photo album and I see pictures of myself back then, all I can think is OMG, WTF was I thinking? LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top