Teen arrested for defending him self against the mob!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What law did he break
Probably some law involving shooting people.

We have those, you know.
You mean there is a law against murder? Since when?
Do we have no right to defend our selves?
Everyone has a right to defend themselves. The defense has to be proportionate to the threat. Having said that a self-defense theory will be difficult as the shooter is brandishing a weapon while running up and down a street. A vigilante will have a hard time proving self-defense. Hell, the video shows the shooter tripping and then him appearing to shoot randomly. That evidence will be his kiss of death.
Lol he was running from the mob, he tripped running from them, and they attacked him, he shot a few rounds, and they still came,, 2 are now dead hahaha Hahahahah Hahahahahah.
He will be out soon he has rights. I know you hate that.. Stalin
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.
How have vigilantes made it worse? Also, are there more than just this kid? If so, give me a link to those vids. I hope they are as entertaining as this one.
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Gun rights have nothing to do with economic policy....


There are two axis. Social and economic

Actual economic marxists don't exist in america. And social marxists don't either in any numbers

To be a social marxist you'd need to support chinese style authoritarianism. Wanting state enforced equal outcomes for all demographics isn't enough.
dont believe everything you read on the internet,,that compass is wrong in this country,,,
 
The local police are in Kenosha, the sheriff's depts from other various cities and towns are in Kenosha,

Along with the federal govts FBI are in Kenosha, the ATF are in Kenosha, the US Marshalls are in Kenosha

The vigilantes are not needed, and have made it worse.
How have vigilantes made it worse? Also, are there more than just this kid? If so, give me a link to those vids. I hope they are as entertaining as this one.
She’s a dufus
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Whatever they rule goes. It's why the most important factor to me in a presidential election is the possible justices he will pick.
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Whatever they rule goes. It's why the most important factor to me in a presidential election is the possible justices he will pick.

and thats why I never vote for dems or repubes,,,
 
What law did he break
Probably some law involving shooting people.

We have those, you know.
You mean there is a law against murder? Since when?
Do we have no right to defend our selves?
Everyone has a right to defend themselves. The defense has to be proportionate to the threat. A vigilante will have a hard time proving self-defense. Hell, the video shows the shooter tripping and then appearing to shoot randomly from a sitting position. That evidence will be his kiss of death.
This could be 'the shot heard 'round the world'. #KyleRittenhouse - say his name!

The socialists made a strategic mistake this time. All video evidence to this point demonstrates democrat terrorists agitating and attacking an armed patriot.

Waiting.
Watching.
Prepared.
 
I did, in the link does not say this was self-defense. Which means you are the one who didn't read the article. Awkward.

The guy was running with a rifle, he fell down and the pursuers came at him, tried to kick him and take his rifle. There are several videos from multiple sources showing this. It clearly looks like self defense but, I believe he is been charged with first degree murder.

A Daily Caller reporter was on the scene:


"The alleged shooter is currently in custody and is being held at a juvenile facility in Illinois, according to ABC7.
The Daily Caller’s Richie McGinniss interviewed the suspect just before the incident occurred."

"The man, armed with a rifle standing outside a local business, told McGinniss that his “job is to protect this business,” and that “if there’s somebody hurt, I’m running into harms way.”



Another video shows what appears to be the shooter running away, while a group of individuals chase after him. One person tries to tackle what appears to be the shooter. He then seems to fire his rifle multiple times before getting up. The suspect then appears to run toward police officers with his hands up. An individual in the video can be heard screaming “Hey! He just shot them!” The shooter then appears to walk past police officers.


People were pursuing the little vigilante because he had shot people. They attacked him to disarm the little puke. I hope he's tried as an adult, and his stupid ass is fried. Big tough guy gonna take his AR15 down to the protest and shoot him some protestors.
 
I did, in the link does not say this was self-defense. Which means you are the one who didn't read the article. Awkward.

The guy was running with a rifle, he fell down and the pursuers came at him, tried to kick him and take his rifle. There are several videos from multiple sources showing this. It clearly looks like self defense but, I believe he is been charged with first degree murder.

A Daily Caller reporter was on the scene:


"The alleged shooter is currently in custody and is being held at a juvenile facility in Illinois, according to ABC7.
The Daily Caller’s Richie McGinniss interviewed the suspect just before the incident occurred."

"The man, armed with a rifle standing outside a local business, told McGinniss that his “job is to protect this business,” and that “if there’s somebody hurt, I’m running into harms way.”



Another video shows what appears to be the shooter running away, while a group of individuals chase after him. One person tries to tackle what appears to be the shooter. He then seems to fire his rifle multiple times before getting up. The suspect then appears to run toward police officers with his hands up. An individual in the video can be heard screaming “Hey! He just shot them!” The shooter then appears to walk past police officers.


People were pursuing the little vigilante because he had shot people. They attacked him to disarm the little puke. I hope he's tried as an adult, and his stupid ass is fried. Big tough guy gonna take his AR15 down to the protest and shoot him some protestors.

it was a riot not a protest you ignorant twit,,,
 
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
He looks like one of those INCEL characters.

You know, I kinda thought the same thing. Especially when I saw that he was wearing Crocs. What kind of a gun owner would have a picture of them with their gun, wearing the most pussified type of footwear?

Quick question for you gun owners out there, would you be willing to have your picture taken of you holding your gun and wearing Crocs? Better question still, would any of you guys even own Crocs?

Obviously by my avatar, I have no problem being photoed with my gun. :auiqs.jpg:

Whether or not you would have a picture taken with your gun wasn't quite the question. The question is, would you have that picture taken while wearing Crocs? The follow up question to that was how many of you gun owners actually own Crocs?

That I couldn't tell you. To be totally honest, I didn't know what crocs were until this topic. This is a kid after all. When I was a kid, I wore an army jacket, tie died tee shirts, bell bottom jeans, and had hair down to my shoulders. my mother made me an elastic band for my bike to tie up my bell bottoms because they kept getting caught between the bike chain and sprockets. When the family breaks out the photo album and I see pictures of myself back then, all I can think is OMG, WTF was I thinking? LOL.

That was an issue long after bell bottom jeans. Unless you were a skate rat with skin tight jeans*

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Gun rights have nothing to do with economic policy....


There are two axis. Social and economic

Actual economic marxists don't exist in america. And social marxists don't either in any numbers

To be a social marxist you'd need to support chinese style authoritarianism. Wanting state enforced equal outcomes for all demographics isn't enough.
dont believe everything you read on the internet,,that compass is wrong in this country,,,

What?

It's a political scale, it's a bit arbitrary. Social and economic policy overlap.

Oobviously if you have no currency and the state controls everything in an economic sense. Your personal liberty is going to be severely limited depending on how they do that.

But to call it wrong is absurd. It's a universal scale specifically trying to remove a variable like American culture so you don't have some twisted view where you think NYT or MSNBC employees are commies working for massive corporations.

Basically all Americans fall at the socially libertarian bottom half of the scale. And very few would qualify as anything more extreme than centrists on an economic scale.
 
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:

The kid is a legitimate patriot… He should be honored and rewarded.
 
It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Whatever they rule goes. It's why the most important factor to me in a presidential election is the possible justices he will pick.

and thats why I never vote for dems or repubes,,,

And that's your right. However you are just throwing your vote away. No third party candidate will ever be president in our lifetime.
 
What law did he break
Probably some law involving shooting people.

We have those, you know.
You mean there is a law against murder? Since when?
Do we have no right to defend our selves?
Everyone has a right to defend themselves. The defense has to be proportionate to the threat. Having said that a self-defense theory will be difficult as the shooter is brandishing a weapon while running up and down a street. A vigilante will have a hard time proving self-defense. Hell, the video shows the shooter tripping and then him appearing to shoot randomly. That evidence will be his kiss of death.
Lol he was running from the mob, he tripped running from them, and they attacked him, he shot a few rounds, and they still came,, 2 are now dead hahaha Hahahahah Hahahahahah.
He will be out soon he has rights. I know you hate that.. Stalin
As usual your facts are fucked up.
 
Look how clueless these leftist are... seriously. They think this kid shooting two other kids while laying on the ground getting attacked by them is going to wipe away from our minds all of the rioting/looting/burning/terrorizing by all of these thugs.... hahahahaha!!
If it wasn't so tragic it would be funny.
And this is why Trump will win again.
 
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
Update: Here's the suspect:
rittenhouse-1.jpg

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Liability would be very high for police if found to be giving right-wing militia members the right to kill. But let's not rush to judgment.
Details should be revealed soon:
He looks like one of those INCEL characters.

You know, I kinda thought the same thing. Especially when I saw that he was wearing Crocs. What kind of a gun owner would have a picture of them with their gun, wearing the most pussified type of footwear?

Quick question for you gun owners out there, would you be willing to have your picture taken of you holding your gun and wearing Crocs? Better question still, would any of you guys even own Crocs?

Obviously by my avatar, I have no problem being photoed with my gun. :auiqs.jpg:

Whether or not you would have a picture taken with your gun wasn't quite the question. The question is, would you have that picture taken while wearing Crocs? The follow up question to that was how many of you gun owners actually own Crocs?

That I couldn't tell you. To be totally honest, I didn't know what crocs were until this topic. This is a kid after all. When I was a kid, I wore an army jacket, tie died tee shirts, bell bottom jeans, and had hair down to my shoulders. my mother made me an elastic band for my bike to tie up my bell bottoms because they kept getting caught between the bike chain and sprockets. When the family breaks out the photo album and I see pictures of myself back then, all I can think is OMG, WTF was I thinking? LOL.

That was an issue long after bell bottom jeans. Unless you were a skate rat with skin tight jeans*

It is still unclear whether this is a right-wing militia member or a left-wing protester belonging to a group such as antifa.
Details should be revealed soon:
Are militias typically full of kids in their rank and file?

Seems pretty far fetched to me. Anyone can "claim" anything. Doesn't make it so.

Either way the left have the blood of 30+ people on their hands.

If you are 17 and carrying a gun, you are already breaking the law even if you didn't shoot anybody.

In Texas a 17 year old can own one,he just cant purchase one.

Can they carry a concealed one in public? Our law is you can't get a CCW until the age of 21.
CCW's violate the 2nd amendment,,,

The Supreme Court didn't see it that way. According to the last ruling I read, government can regulate your right to firearms, but can't prohibit it, just regulate it. I think that decision was after the national assault gun ban, but don't quote me on that.
well thats just proof they cant read simple english,,,

and saying you cant carry one without their permission is prohibiting having one,,,
just like the back ground checks,,,

its funny how it took them 200 yrs to decide that though,,almost like it was a political decision not a constitutional one,,,

It never was political until the liberals hijacked the Democrat party. Liberals are control freaks. If they don't like or want something, you shouldn't like or want it either. They want to take away our guns and police all at the same time. They want Portland and Seattle every night of the week and us not capable of defending ourselves.
by definition they arent liberals theyre marxist of one flavor or another,,

once thats understood it all makes sense,,,and also proves the ruling by the SCOTUS is worthless and I reject it,,as best I can,,

Gun rights have nothing to do with economic policy....


There are two axis. Social and economic

Actual economic marxists don't exist in america. And social marxists don't either in any numbers

To be a social marxist you'd need to support chinese style authoritarianism. Wanting state enforced equal outcomes for all demographics isn't enough.
dont believe everything you read on the internet,,that compass is wrong in this country,,,

What?

It's a political scale, it's a bit arbitrary. Social and economic policy overlap.

Oobviously if you have no currency and the state controls everything in an economic sense. Your personal liberty is going to be severely limited depending on how they do that.

But to call it wrong is absurd. It's a universal scale specifically trying to remove a variable like American culture so you don't have some twisted view where you think NYT or MSNBC employees are commies working for massive corporations.

Basically all Americans fall at the socially libertarian bottom half of the scale.


it has no meaning in this country under our constitution,,,

our scale is a straight line with total government on the left and anarchy on the right with the constitution in the middle,,,


under our constitution the economy is no business of the federal government,,,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top