Teenage Palestinian girl 'executed in cold blood,' witnesses say

Status
Not open for further replies.
Israeli police shooting and killing a 16-year-old in cold blood, who did not pose a lethal threat when she was hit with some 20 bullets, cannot be good for business. And you clowns defending this is sickening.

The above is the typical Pro Palestinian lie but what if it were the truth? If this " innocent" Palestinian was an Israeli this sick dementedposter would be handing out the Candy.

Hey, quartermaster punk, here is what your heroes do to children when they are not killing them.




Hey, You Prick. At least you didn't dispute my post. Making progress !!!!!

I didn't take it seriously, sorry.


Wasn't referring to you; Asshole
 
Get armed jews the hell off Muslim holy land before you posts again, fair?

Completely irrelevant to my comments. But, perhaps you can clarify, exactly, what land in Israel is "Muslim holy land".
East Jerusalem is Occupied Palestinian territory.



East Jerusalem was not " occupied" Palestinian territory before 1967 nor is it now

Of course it is occupied territory, asshole.
 
Get armed jews the hell off Muslim holy land before you posts again, fair?

Completely irrelevant to my comments. But, perhaps you can clarify, exactly, what land in Israel is "Muslim holy land".
East Jerusalem is Occupied Palestinian territory.



East Jerusalem was not " occupied" Palestinian territory before 1967 nor is it now

Of course it is occupied territory, asshole.
Who was occupying it before 1967, unshowered antisemtic asshole?
 
Get armed jews the hell off Muslim holy land before you posts again, fair?

Completely irrelevant to my comments. But, perhaps you can clarify, exactly, what land in Israel is "Muslim holy land".
East Jerusalem is Occupied Palestinian territory.



East Jerusalem was not " occupied" Palestinian territory before 1967 nor is it now

Of course it is occupied territory, asshole.
Who was occupying it before 1967, unshowered antisemtic asshole?

It's you people that don't shower. I'm a real American, I shower every day.
 
Completely irrelevant to my comments. But, perhaps you can clarify, exactly, what land in Israel is "Muslim holy land".
East Jerusalem is Occupied Palestinian territory.



East Jerusalem was not " occupied" Palestinian territory before 1967 nor is it now

Of course it is occupied territory, asshole.
Who was occupying it before 1967, unshowered antisemtic asshole?

It's you people that don't shower. I'm a real American, I shower every day.
Is that why you changed your picture, when I pointed out that you look like a mentally ill homeless person who hasn't showered in a month? Maybe it struck a cord of truth, eh? You aren't fooling anybody but yourself.
 
Stop the Vortex.
Shusha, you have now officially entered the twisted pretzel of Tinmore's twisted (il)logic. Let me know how it works out for you, lol. I tried once, as you were here, and never found the end of the pretzel. Because, like a pretzel, it just goes around in circles.
 
Stop the Vortex.
Shusha, you have now officially entered the twisted pretzel of Tinmore's twisted (il)logic. Let me know how it works out for you, lol. I tried once, as you were here, and never found the end of the pretzel. Because, like a pretzel, it just goes around in circles.

Oh, I know. And when the questions get real tough and real specific, he just bails.
 
Do you believe that people under military occupation should teach their children to submit to the occupation and not resist the occupier? When has it ever happened that occupied populations did not resist the occupier?
True, in a way. That is what the Native Americans did in the United States for a time. But, right or wrong, even they realized that it was better to stop the violence, make peace, settle with the land that they were alloted and preserve what they had left of their culture and their 'reservations' and learn to prosper.

Sure wish the Palestinians would learn from them before their 'reservation' is gone.
 
Do you believe that people under military occupation should teach their children to submit to the occupation and not resist the occupier? When has it ever happened that occupied populations did not resist the occupier?
True, in a way. That is what the Native Americans did in the United States for a time. But, right or wrong, even they realized that it was better to stop the violence, make peace, settle with the land that they were alloted and preserve what they had left of their culture and their 'reservations' and learn to prosper.

Sure wish the Palestinians would learn from them before their 'reservation' is gone.

The native americans did not stop resisting until their numbers were reduced, mostly by disease, to a small fraction of their original number. The Palestinians don't seem to have a problem increasing their population at a rate that will insure they will be a substantial majority over the Jews on the land contriolled by Jews within a generation or two. It is a different dynamic. Time is on the Palestinian's side.

The native americans are not prospering by any means.

"Contrary to what many Americans believe, most Native people are living in desperate conditions. Despite being given "consent" to operate casinos on their own sovereign lands, the vast majority of tribes live in a poverty that many Americans would never dream existed in their own back yards."

Native Americans can't always cash in on casinos | Barbara Wells
 
Do you believe that people under military occupation should teach their children to submit to the occupation and not resist the occupier? When has it ever happened that occupied populations did not resist the occupier?
True, in a way. That is what the Native Americans did in the United States for a time. But, right or wrong, even they realized that it was better to stop the violence, make peace, settle with the land that they were alloted and preserve what they had left of their culture and their 'reservations' and learn to prosper.

Sure wish the Palestinians would learn from them before their 'reservation' is gone.

The native americans did not stop resisting until their numbers were reduced, mostly by disease, to a small fraction of their original number. The Palestinians don't seem to have a problem increasing their population at a rate that will insure they will be a substantial majority over the Jews on the land contriolled by Jews within a generation or two. It is a different dynamic. Time is on the Palestinian's side.

The native americans are not prospering by any means.

"Contrary to what many Americans believe, most Native people are living in desperate conditions. Despite being given "consent" to operate casinos on their own sovereign lands, the vast majority of tribes live in a poverty that many Americans would never dream existed in their own back yards."

Native Americans can't always cash in on casinos | Barbara Wells

What a shame that the US does not divert the money given to the Arab-Moslem islamic terrorist welfare fraud (UNRWA) and use it at home.
 
Do you have evidence this woman did NOT have a weapon in hand?

You have to first prove she didn't "pose a lethal threat" before expressing outrage over defending the soldier's actions.

Actually evidence please. "All Jews are liars" doesn't count as evidence.

Thanks!
The burden of that proof lies with the known liars. Be serious.

Ah, so you've got nothing.

You were saying something about liars?

Pathetic.
I have a dead girl with 20 bullet holes in her. What you got?

Logical fallacy of moving the goal posts.

Again, if she had a weapon, that's hardly cold blooded murder. If she did not, which you've offered NO evidence of, we have a very different situation.

You couldn't possibly be this obtuse.
I also have a plethora of witnesses claiming she was EXECUTED IN COLD BLOOD. YOU STILL HAVE NOT SHOWN THAT SHE POSED ANY THREAT IN THE LEAST.

Pathetic.

Eyewitnesses...always spot on.

You go with that.

So it's been a while now. Did she have a weapon?
 
Ah, they must have planted a weapon on her. That's it!

Works every time...

You're quite the antisemitic asshat, aren't you?
No, not at all. I justr prefer proof as opposed to the words of people with a history of lying.

It's called common sense (although oddly, not that common).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top