Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right...you suggest forced changes to a religion.Then you missed pcs post suggesting just that, and you do not know the full context to which youre replying.No matter which religion produces the most violent attacks...Youre an idiot.
Theyre not deflections.
Theyre point proving........... double standards.
Obvious to the unbiased mind, which youre just a poser.
Im the real deal of what you pretend to be. Get to know it, rightwinger.
Well earlier this afternoon, I posted a long list of terrorist acts committed by Islamic terrorists in the last 15 years. In most of these, the terrorists took credit for the acts and justified the acts as for the glory of Allah or to avenge some insult they saw directed at their prophet or for some offense committed against Islam.
But we sure don't want a double standard. Could you please post a similar list of terrorist acts committed by Christians in the last 15 years for the glory of God or Christ or to avenge some insult they saw directed at either or for some offense committed against Christianity?
All religions are for the weak minded...
But also, all religions produce miniscule violence in relation to their followers at large.
And thats the point, isnt it.
Not a question.
It is the point.
Banning or discriminating all based on the actions of the few is brain dead drooling fucking retarded.
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all.
But when more than 90% of the terrorist attacks in the last two decades involve Islamic extremists, do you think that law enforcement and public policy should not acknowledge or address that?
If the attacks were being carried out by white supremacists by the same ratio, would you be opposed to acknowledging or addressing that? Do you think that nobody should be more suspicious of a skinhead than anybody else or such a person should not receive increased scrutiny if that was the case?
Do you think eyebrows should not be raised more when a group of Middle Eastern guys in the country on travel or education visas sign up for flying lessons than if a group of ROTC cadets did so?
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all. But to fail to see the truth for what it is does no favors to anybody because peaceful Muslims and peaceful white people also suffer when senseless acts of mass murder are carried out.
And no, im not against reasonable suspicions so long as its not an infringement on anyones liberty.
If you weren't a moron, gerb, I'd call you a liar.
But in your case, it is simple stupidity.
I said the religion requires a reformation, i.e., remove the mandate to kill those who don't agree with same.
Is that too nuanced from you to understand?
Now...get back in your little house.
Right...you suggest forced changes to a religion.Then you missed pcs post suggesting just that, and you do not know the full context to which youre replying.No matter which religion produces the most violent attacks...Well earlier this afternoon, I posted a long list of terrorist acts committed by Islamic terrorists in the last 15 years. In most of these, the terrorists took credit for the acts and justified the acts as for the glory of Allah or to avenge some insult they saw directed at their prophet or for some offense committed against Islam.
But we sure don't want a double standard. Could you please post a similar list of terrorist acts committed by Christians in the last 15 years for the glory of God or Christ or to avenge some insult they saw directed at either or for some offense committed against Christianity?
All religions are for the weak minded...
But also, all religions produce miniscule violence in relation to their followers at large.
And thats the point, isnt it.
Not a question.
It is the point.
Banning or discriminating all based on the actions of the few is brain dead drooling fucking retarded.
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all.
But when more than 90% of the terrorist attacks in the last two decades involve Islamic extremists, do you think that law enforcement and public policy should not acknowledge or address that?
If the attacks were being carried out by white supremacists by the same ratio, would you be opposed to acknowledging or addressing that? Do you think that nobody should be more suspicious of a skinhead than anybody else or such a person should not receive increased scrutiny if that was the case?
Do you think eyebrows should not be raised more when a group of Middle Eastern guys in the country on travel or education visas sign up for flying lessons than if a group of ROTC cadets did so?
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all. But to fail to see the truth for what it is does no favors to anybody because peaceful Muslims and peaceful white people also suffer when senseless acts of mass murder are carried out.
And no, im not against reasonable suspicions so long as its not an infringement on anyones liberty.
If you weren't a moron, gerb, I'd call you a liar.
But in your case, it is simple stupidity.
I said the religion requires a reformation, i.e., remove the mandate to kill those who don't agree with same.
Is that too nuanced from you to understand?
Now...get back in your little house.
Glad you admit youre fascist.
You know that religions are developed around gods, and you arent one.
You know that, right smug smiley?
Want attention? Burn your braFruit Loops of courseNah.....I won it in a cereal box.
left the door wide open on this one
Wheaties....the breakfast of champions!!
That is so Lesbo-Gay
Let me respond with the motto of the Feminist movement: THAT'S NOT FUNNY!
All you do is yapp you cornball. Save your b.s. for someone who is hungry.
Back from protesting a funeral?All you do is yapp you cornball. Save your b.s. for someone who is hungry.
Carrot, gerb?
In responding to questions about the horror that took place in Paris earlier today, Democrat/Liberal Howard Deans revealed the sort of honesty that many have come to expect from folks of his political persuasion.
"Howard Dean: Don’t Call Paris Attackers ‘Muslim Terrorists’
... former Gov.Howard Dean (D-VT) immediately dismissed the idea that Islam would be to blame for the attack.
“I stopped calling these people Muslim terrorists,” Dean said on Morning Joe. ”They’re about as Muslim as I am.”
He also said he does not believe ISIS is an “Islamic cult” and thinks it would be unwise to “accord [the gunmen] any religious respect.”
Despite Dean’s early assertions, though, one of the gunmen purportedly said ‘Allahu Akhbar’ in a videothat was released after the attack, and another was reportedly heard shouting “we have avenged the prophet.”
Howard Dean Don 8217 t Call Paris Attackers 8216 Muslim Terrorists 8217 Mediaite
And, in an earlier tale, equally reality-based...
"OBAMA: ISLAMIC STATE 'IS NOT ISLAMIC'
In his prime-time speech to the nation on the eve of the 13th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, President Obama vowed to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State insurgency in Iraq and Syria with airstrikes and 475 U.S. boots on the ground – but he also made a particular point of declaring that the Islamic State terrorists “are not Islamic.”
Obama Islamic State 8216 is not Islamic 8217
And, let's remember...."you can keep your doctor," and the ever-popular "you didn't build that!"
In responding to questions about the horror that took place in Paris earlier today, Democrat/Liberal Howard Deans revealed the sort of honesty that many have come to expect from folks of his political persuasion.
"Howard Dean: Don’t Call Paris Attackers ‘Muslim Terrorists’
... former Gov.Howard Dean (D-VT) immediately dismissed the idea that Islam would be to blame for the attack.
“I stopped calling these people Muslim terrorists,” Dean said on Morning Joe. ”They’re about as Muslim as I am.”
He also said he does not believe ISIS is an “Islamic cult” and thinks it would be unwise to “accord [the gunmen] any religious respect.”
Despite Dean’s early assertions, though, one of the gunmen purportedly said ‘Allahu Akhbar’ in a videothat was released after the attack, and another was reportedly heard shouting “we have avenged the prophet.”
Howard Dean Don 8217 t Call Paris Attackers 8216 Muslim Terrorists 8217 Mediaite
And, in an earlier tale, equally reality-based...
"OBAMA: ISLAMIC STATE 'IS NOT ISLAMIC'
In his prime-time speech to the nation on the eve of the 13th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, President Obama vowed to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State insurgency in Iraq and Syria with airstrikes and 475 U.S. boots on the ground – but he also made a particular point of declaring that the Islamic State terrorists “are not Islamic.”
Obama Islamic State 8216 is not Islamic 8217
And, let's remember...."you can keep your doctor," and the ever-popular "you didn't build that!"
I can't agree with Dean on this. It is like those silly people who say that Hitler wasn't a Christian.
No matter which religion produces the most violent attacks...Youre an idiot.who called terrorists that?
Well, with the constant deflections to Christianity that these threads have been seeing, I figured that needed to be part of the name.
And I went with "meanies", because I don't want to offend them, oh my gosh, the last thing I want to do is offend them.
.
Theyre not deflections.
Theyre point proving........... double standards.
Obvious to the unbiased mind, which youre just a poser.
Im the real deal of what you pretend to be. Get to know it, rightwinger.
Well earlier this afternoon, I posted a long list of terrorist acts committed by Islamic terrorists in the last 15 years. In most of these, the terrorists took credit for the acts and justified the acts as for the glory of Allah or to avenge some insult they saw directed at their prophet or for some offense committed against Islam.
But we sure don't want a double standard. Could you please post a similar list of terrorist acts committed by Christians in the last 15 years for the glory of God or Christ or to avenge some insult they saw directed at either or for some offense committed against Christianity?
All religions are for the weak minded...
But also, all religions produce miniscule violence in relation to their followers at large.
And thats the point, isnt it.
Not a question.
It is the point.
Banning or discriminating all based on the actions of the few is brain dead drooling fucking retarded.
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all.
t.
No matter which religion produces the most violent attacks...Youre an idiot.Well, with the constant deflections to Christianity that these threads have been seeing, I figured that needed to be part of the name.
And I went with "meanies", because I don't want to offend them, oh my gosh, the last thing I want to do is offend them.
.
Theyre not deflections.
Theyre point proving........... double standards.
Obvious to the unbiased mind, which youre just a poser.
Im the real deal of what you pretend to be. Get to know it, rightwinger.
Well earlier this afternoon, I posted a long list of terrorist acts committed by Islamic terrorists in the last 15 years. In most of these, the terrorists took credit for the acts and justified the acts as for the glory of Allah or to avenge some insult they saw directed at their prophet or for some offense committed against Islam.
But we sure don't want a double standard. Could you please post a similar list of terrorist acts committed by Christians in the last 15 years for the glory of God or Christ or to avenge some insult they saw directed at either or for some offense committed against Christianity?
All religions are for the weak minded...
But also, all religions produce miniscule violence in relation to their followers at large.
And thats the point, isnt it.
Not a question.
It is the point.
Banning or discriminating all based on the actions of the few is brain dead drooling fucking retarded.
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all.
t.
First of all, there has been a widespread effort to ban Muslims from building mosques in the US, starting with the so-called ground zero mosque.
Secondly, it's clear that these kind of attacks on Islam are designed to incite bigotry against the whole religion.
Murder comes first
Bigotry which incites murder comes next
Bigotry comes last
On a scale.
Glad i could help, mouth breather.
Gerbil trumps turnip. Sorry to go super saiyon on your ass. Dork.Murder comes first
Bigotry which incites murder comes next
Bigotry comes last
On a scale.
Glad i could help, mouth breather.
Wanna carrot, gerbil?
Get back on that wheel!
Gerbil trumps turnip. Sorry to go super saiyon on your ass. Dork.Murder comes first
Bigotry which incites murder comes next
Bigotry comes last
On a scale.
Glad i could help, mouth breather.
Wanna carrot, gerbil?
Get back on that wheel!
No matter which religion produces the most violent attacks...Youre an idiot.
Theyre not deflections.
Theyre point proving........... double standards.
Obvious to the unbiased mind, which youre just a poser.
Im the real deal of what you pretend to be. Get to know it, rightwinger.
Well earlier this afternoon, I posted a long list of terrorist acts committed by Islamic terrorists in the last 15 years. In most of these, the terrorists took credit for the acts and justified the acts as for the glory of Allah or to avenge some insult they saw directed at their prophet or for some offense committed against Islam.
But we sure don't want a double standard. Could you please post a similar list of terrorist acts committed by Christians in the last 15 years for the glory of God or Christ or to avenge some insult they saw directed at either or for some offense committed against Christianity?
All religions are for the weak minded...
But also, all religions produce miniscule violence in relation to their followers at large.
And thats the point, isnt it.
Not a question.
It is the point.
Banning or discriminating all based on the actions of the few is brain dead drooling fucking retarded.
I haven't seen anybody suggest banning or discriminating against all.
t.
First of all, there has been a widespread effort to ban Muslims from building mosques in the US, starting with the so-called ground zero mosque.
Secondly, it's clear that these kind of attacks on Islam are designed to incite bigotry against the whole religion.
Which do you find worse, 'bigotry,' or murder?
Can you work a lie into your response?
Do you realize your jokes wouldnt even be funny in the great depression funny papers?
Dont quit your dayj....erm......dont quit being an illogical anonymous message board sycophant.
Do you realize your jokes wouldnt even be funny in the great depression funny papers?
Dont quit your dayj....erm......dont quit being an illogical anonymous message board sycophant.
