🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Texas Mall Killer was a Neo-Nazi White Supremacist

Why yes!
"Another club member explained that Trump “kicked Epstein out after Epstein harassed the daughter of a member. The way this person described it, such an act could irreparably harm the Trump brand, leaving Donald no choice but to remove Epstein,” said Sarah Blaskey, a Miami Herald investigative reporter who co-wrote the book with Miami Herald journalists Nicholas Nehamas and Jay Weaver and Caitlin Ostroff of the Wall Street Journal. "

You're an uninformed ignorant idiot. Try again, fucknugget.

And I shall bitchsmack you with the truth once more if you are wrong again, I thrive on things like that. :D

Laughing...so you've moved your goal posts from 'assault on an underaged girl', to 'harassment the daughter of a member'.

If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to change your claims.

And of course, show us where the lawyer in question presented ANY such testimony of this in court.
 
Nope.....nazis are socialist to their core....

Nazism is Socialism -- F A Hayek, et al

One of the main reasons why the socialist character of National Socialism has been quite generally unrecognized, is, no doubt, its alliance with the nationalist groups which represent the great industries and the great landowners. But this merely proves that these groups too -as they have since learnt to their bitter disappointment -have, at least partly, been mistaken as to the nature of the movement. But only partly because -and this is the most characteristic feature of modern Germany – many capitalists are themselves strongly influenced by socialistic ideas, and have not sufficient belief in capitalism to defend it with a clear conscience. But, in spite of this, the German entrepreneur class have manifested almost incredible short-sightedness in allying themselves with a move movement of whose strong anti-capitalistic tendencies there should never have been any doubt.

A careful observer must always have been aware that the opposition of the Nazis to the established socialist parties, which gained them the sympathy of the entrepreneur, was only to a very small extend directed against their economic policy. What the Nazis mainly objected to was their internationalism and all the aspects of their cultural programme which were still influenced by liberal ideas. But the accusations against the social-democrats and the communists which were most effective in their propaganda were not so much directed against their programme as against their supposed practice -their corruption and nepotism, and even their alleged alliance with “the golden International of Jewish Capitalism.”

It would, indeed, hardly have been possible for the Nationalists to advance fundamental objections to the economic policy of the other socialist parties when their own published programme differed from these only in that its socialism was much cruder and less rational. The famous 25 points drawn up by Herr Feder,[2] one of Hitler’s early allies, repeatedly endorsed by Hitler and recognized by the by-laws of the National-Socialist party as the immutable basis of all its actions, which together with an extensive commentary is circulating throughout Germany in many hundreds of thousands of copies, is full of ideas resembling those of the early socialists. But the dominant feature is a fierce hatred of anything capitalistic -individualistic profit seeking, large scale enterprise, banks, joint-stock companies, department stores, “international finance and loan capital,” the system of “interest slavery” in general; the abolition of these is described as the “[indecipherable] of the programme, around which everything else turns.” It was to this programme that the masses of the German people, who were already completely under the influence of collectivist ideas, responded so enthusiastically.

That this violent anti-capitalistic attack is genuine – and not a mere piece of propaganda – becomes as clear from the personal history of the intellectual leaders of the movement as from the general milieu from which it springs. It is not even denied that man of the young men who today play a prominent part in it have previously been communists or socialists. And to any observer of the literary tendencies which made the Germans intelligentsia ready to join the ranks of the new party, it must be clear that the common characteristic of all the politically influential writers – in many cases free from definite party affiliations – was their anti-liberal and anti-capitalist trend. Groups like that formed around the review “Die Tat” have made the phrase “the end of capitalism” an accepted dogma to most young Germans.[3]

And more...

The Myth of "Nazi Capitalism" | Chris Calton

German socialism, as Mises defines it, differs from what he called “socialism of the Russian pattern” in that “it, seemingly and nominally, maintains private ownership of the means of production, entrepreneurship, and market exchange.” However, this is only a superficial system of private ownership because through a complete system of economic intervention and control, the entrepreneurial function of the property owners is completely controlled by the State. By this, Mises means that shop owners do not speculate about future events for the purpose of allocating resources in the pursuit of profits. Just like in the Soviet Union, this entrepreneurial speculation and resource allocation is done by a single entity, the State, and economic calculation is thus impossible.

“In Nazi Germany,” Mises tells us, the property owners “were called shop managers or Betriebsführer. The government tells these seeming entrepreneurs what and how to produce, at what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to whom to sell. The government decrees at what wages labourers should work, and to whom and under what terms the capitalists should entrust their funds. Market exchange is but a sham. As all prices, wages and interest rates are fixed by the authority, they are prices, wages and interest rates in appearance only; in fact they are merely quantitative terms in the authoritarian orders determining each citizen’s income, consumption and standard of living. The authority, not the consumers, directs production. The central board of production management is supreme; all citizens are nothing else but civil servants. This is socialism with the outward appearance of capitalism. Some labels of the capitalistic market economy are retained, but they signify here something entirely different from what they mean in the market economy.”
======

Nazis Were Not Marxists, but They Were Socialists | Jörg Guido Hülsmann

Nazis and marx..

Read A Pile Of Top Nazis Talking About How They Love Leftist Marxism

The Nazis were leftists. This statement is blasphemy to the academic-media complex, since everyone knows the Nazis were degenerate right-wingers fueled by toxic capitalism and racism. But evidence Adolf Hitler’s gang were men of the left, while debatable, is compelling.
The dispute on Nazi origins resurfaced through the confluence of brawling alt-right and antifa fringe movements and recent alternative histories by Dinesh D’Souza and others. The vitriol and lack of candor it produces from supposedly fact-driven academics and media is disturbing, if unsurprising. They stifle dissent on touchy subjects to maintain their narrative and enforce cultural hegemony.

However uncomfortable to opinion shapers, alternative views of the Third Reich exist and were written by the finest minds of their time. Opinions from the period perhaps carry more weight because they are unburdened by the aftermath of the uniquely heinous Nazi crimes.
------

Also, Adolf Hitler Loved Karl Marx
It wasn’t only theoretical. Hitler repeatedly praised Marx privately, stating he had “learned a great deal from Marxism.” The trouble with the Weimar Republic, he said, was that its politicians “had never even read Marx.” He also stated his differences with communists were that they were intellectual types passing out pamphlets, whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun.”

It wasn’t just privately that Hitler’s fealty for Marx surfaced. In “Mein Kampf,” he states that without his racial insights National Socialism “would really do nothing more than compete with Marxism on its own ground.” Nor did Hitler eschew this sentiment once reaching power. As late as 1941, with the war in bloom, he stated “basically National Socialism and Marxism are the same” in a speech published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Nazi propaganda minister and resident intellectual Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary that the Nazis would install “real socialism” after Russia’s defeat in the East. And Hitler favorite Albert Speer, the Nazi armaments minister whose memoir became an international bestseller, wrote that Hitler viewed Joseph Stalin as a kindred spirit, ensuring his prisoner of war son received good treatment, and even talked of keeping Stalin in power in a puppet government after Germany’s eventual triumph. His views on Great Britain’s Winston Churchill and the United States’s Franklin Delano Roosevelt were decidedly less kind.

Nazi and Communist Hatred of Each Other Was Brotherly
Despite this, there’s a persistent claim that Nazis and communists hated each other, and mention that the Nazis persecuted socialists and oppressed trade unions. These things are true, but prove little. The camps’ hatred stemmed from familiarity. It was internecine, the nastiest kind.

The Nazis and communists were not only in a struggle for street-war supremacy, but also recruits. These recruits were easily turned, because both sides were fighting for the same men. Hayek recalls

Nope...

 
That's not socialist, mary. Socialism is when the public owns industry. The government controlling industry is a Command economy."
"collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"


Your dumb ass doesn't even understand words. Why should anyone take you seriously?
 
Laughing...so you've moved your goal posts from 'assault on an underaged girl', to 'harassment the daughter of a member'.

If your argument had merit, you wouldn't have had to change your claims.

And of course, show us where the lawyer in question presented ANY such testimony of this in court.
Laughing at the fact that you got owned and shown to be an uninformed asshole yet again? Trump removed Epstein and aided his prosecution in Florida. Per the lawyers involved with that case. My sources are better than yours. Then again, you cite only yourself and the voices from your ass.
 
Laughing at the fact that you got owned and shown to be an uninformed asshole yet again? Trump removed Epstein and aided his prosecution in Florida. Per the lawyers involved with that case. My sources are better than yours. Then again, you cite only yourself and the voices from your ass.

And what evidence did the lawyer present to back the his claim that Epstein was removed for assaulting an under aged girl?

I'm all ears.
 
And what evidence did the lawyer present to back the his claim that Epstein was removed for assaulting an under aged girl?

I'm all ears.
Your ignorance and willful stupidity is your problem. Do some work. My sources are better than yours. Remember, you’re a liar who does nothing but parrot Dim talking points.
 
Your a hack and I think it's FUCKING HILARIOUS that you actually believe the garbage you're fed by your media masters.

His victims were white but he is a white supremacist..
Except for nearly the entire Cho family, dope.

 
"collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods"


Your dumb ass doesn't even understand words. Why should anyone take you seriously?

Moronic Mary, neither the public nor the government owned private industry in Nazi Germany.

:cuckoo:
 
Your ignorance and willful stupidity is your problem. Do some work. My sources are better than yours. Remember, you’re a liar who does nothing but parrot Dim talking points.

LOL

Here's your source...

71c8cTRcy1L.jpg
 
We see a lot of extreme political anger on here...and huge support for vigilantes and guns.

This is what their 'Civil War' is. Just random nut jobs attacking federal buildings, shooting up malls are attacking FBI offices.

The actual civil war was lead by the States. The MAGA 'civil war' is just hurting people.
 
Why are so many of the Right-Wing members here so determined to argue that this guy wasn't a Nazi, wasn't a White Supremacist? Who are you trying to protect? How is him being a Nazi offensive to your identity?
 
Why are so many of the Right-Wing members here so determined to argue that this guy wasn't a Nazi, wasn't a White Supremacist? Who are you trying to protect? How is him being a Nazi offensive to your identity?
How is a Mexican a White Supremacist, you absolute fucking retarded idiot?

 

Forum List

Back
Top