Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You didn’t answer my question. Why would a life long Republican insider lie under oath to make other republicans simply look bad and risk prison for perjury? Now, why would someone not under oath lie with no downside when the truth would make them look bad?You Libtard filth always want to believe the lies put out by the Democrat Dirty Tricks Department, don't you? But you always get schlonged with the truth.
View attachment 663891
Only a small portion of her testimony was hearsay.
The bulk was a firsthand account. Not hearsay.
Straight from The Nazi Playbook and The Satanic DemNazi book Rules for Radicals on how to tell lies and undermine everyone who tells the truth.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I love this bar. The DewDropInn at the corner of Cloud Cuckoo Land.
There be nutters there. But entertaining nutters.
IMHO
"attempted to walk back"?????
Ummm, nope. That is a sad mis-read of the statement. The lawyer is simply re-enforcing the fact that Ms Hutchinson made her statement under oath. The others contradicting her are refusing.....or at any rate, haven't raised their right hand to testify they are truthful.
So there is that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- And we have her publicly given statement on tape.
- AND...not unimportantly.......her's is under oath.
Globalists have no party but The Satanic Party. People lie. Liars go to Hell. Party affiliation has nothing to do with whether a person will lie or not.You didn’t answer my question. Why would a life long Republican insider lie under oath to make other republicans simply look bad and risk prison for perjury? Now, why would someone not under oath lie with no downside when the truth would make them look bad?
Thier statements have been recorded. They are UNSCOLISTITED statement's unlike Hutchenson's and are admissible in court as direct evidence... Hers, not so much..How ironic. All you have is hearsay that other people present say she lied.
Only Engel and Ornato can confirm or deny her testimony. No one else.
You didn’t answer my question. Why would a life long Republican insider lie under oath to make other republicans simply look bad and risk prison for perjury?
Now, why would someone not under oath lie with no downside when the truth would make them look bad?
It tells me that Engles probably testified to this privately but refused to do so publicly so Hutchinson did instead.So Engles has already spoken to the Committee and they chose to include that tidbit about about Trump assaulting Engles.
What does that tell you?
Like I always said, Trump makes for good TV.How long before Republicans call it fake news?
Link. Or are you lying about that too? You’ll try to simply insulting me rather than think logically.^^^Says the guy who swore Jussie Smollett and Christine Blasey Ford were telling the truth.
LOL! You fucking idiots will literally believe anything.
Nazi Piglosi hasn’t asked the Agents who debunked her lies. I wonder why…..Those directly involved are welcome to testify under oath
Hutchinson did, why won’t they?
“Peacefully and Patriotically let your voices be heard”Key testimony is that Trump was informed they were armed and refused to tone down his rhetoric and still sent them to the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying
As Trump stated, they were not after him, so why would he care?
She has been caught in multiple lies, Dumbass.Nothing she said was a lie. And any grand jury will believe her testimony. And nobody is going to perjure themselves under oath n a courtroom, to protect Trump. That’s why they don’t want to testify.
See how that works?
Perry and Jordan were also the two excluded from the committee. Now we see why."She also said she witnessed her former boss burn documents in his office following a meeting with Pennsylvania Republican Scott Perry, a far-right congressman who pushed Trump to replace Jeffrey Rosen, the acting attorney general at the time, with Jeffrey Clark, a DOJ official prepared to use the department to aid the fraudulent electors plot. (Perry was among the GOP lawmakers who sought pardons after the January 6 riot.) Hutchinson expanded on that earlier testimony Tuesday, revealing that Meadows was among those who sought a pardon from Trump after the attack."
âI Don't F--king Care That They Have Weaponsâ: White House Aide Gives Bombshell Testimony Of the Day Trump Incited the Capitol Attack
Cassidy Hutchinson testified in the January 6 committee hearing that Trump attacked his security detail, threw his lunch against the wall and raged at staff on Jan. 6 for not letting him go to the Capitol alongside rioters.www.vanityfair.com
The serial perjurer yesterday claimed he was.What Beast ride?
Trump was not in the Beast
So this is “The Gossip Committee”If she relayed gossip its not lying if the gossiper told her something false.
my my thx for proving my pointShe's not a liberal.
But the reporter you just sourced in your article is.
So apparently you do believe libs over Trump's people, when it suits you to do so.
But you are stupid enough to believe the Gateway Pundit.
www.rawstory.com
So this is “The Gossip Committee”
