Thanks to the media, the Trump lies about Russia would not have been exposed

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

Hahahahaha

Dumbasses....

Non-debate doesn't count for much.

"Debate" on this forum is equally worthless so what's your point?

 

[BWK]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! When does the "smiting" begin, oh mighty smiter of the Trump voter????? I gotta little somethin' somethin' for the leftard clown posse of frothing at the mouth, sniveling commie pussies.


(snicker)

You are too immature to debate anything. Take a hike.

Hey, you were wanting to "smite" the Trump voters, dumb ass.....so when does it begin , punkinpuss? Or were you simply all talk? I suspect that is the case. The commie leftard's reputation for being physically unimposing, effeminate and weak is well earned. You don't wish to debate, you wish to spew angst.

So, debate this, why wasn't Trump exonerated for obstruction? And where did Mueller put the investigation into Stone for coordinating with Wikileaks about getting the stolen emails to the Russian spy organization Gucifer 2.0? What about the investigation of Manafort and Gates for handing off polling data to the Russian government? Can you debate that? Were those investigations passed off to SDNY?

 

[BWK]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

Hahahahaha

Dumbasses....

Non-debate doesn't count for much.

"Debate" on this forum is equally worthless so what's your point?

The point is, you and your ilk do not debate facts. You just debate emotions.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

Hahahahaha

Dumbasses....

Non-debate doesn't count for much.

"Debate" on this forum is equally worthless so what's your point?

The point is, you and your ilk do not debate facts. You just debate emotions.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Seeing that Mueller has difficult issues understanding the law and facts as they pertain to obstruction, maybe Congress can figure it out, because Barr sure hasn't.

Translation: Even though the career prosecutor and his team of Trump haters we've been hanging our hopes on for two years failed to find any evidence of guilt so we're gonna throw him under the bus and continue with our efforts to overthrow him anyway.

Mueller refused to exonerate Trump for obstruction. Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law." There is no other way to conclude it another light.

So, what does Barr do instead of handing it off to Congress, he rules on it himself. That is a huge political mistake that will be used against Barr and Trump until this presidency is over.

And by the way, can someone tell me how it is not a conspiracy for Manafort and Gates to give polling data to the Russian government in Trump Tower? I wonder if Mueller handed that off to the other districts like Roger Stone and his stolen email dumping with Wikileaks and the Russian spy organization Gucifer 2.0?

6 posts in a row with no reply.

 

[S.J.]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

 

[BWK]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

 

[S.J.]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

That link doesn't back up your claim. Where does Barr say "a sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? You're desperate. And I'm sure you would love for Barr to recuse himself so you could have Rosenstein or some other Trump hater spin Mueller's report to your liking but Barr is not a shrinking violet like Jeff Sessions so I guess that means you're shit out of luck there. Mueller clearly said that neither Trump, nor any member of his campaign colluded with Russia. No evidence means no evidence and you can't spin that. Sucks for you, doesn't it?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

 

[BWK]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

That link doesn't back up your claim. Where does Barr say "a sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? You're desperate. And I'm sure you would love for Barr to recuse himself so you could have Rosenstein or some other Trump hater spin Mueller's report to your liking but Barr is not a shrinking violet like Jeff Sessions so I guess that means you're shit out of luck there. Mueller clearly said that neither Trump, nor any member of his campaign colluded with Russia. No evidence means no evidence and you can't spin that. Sucks for you, doesn't it?

So, you read the memo? You must be the first one?

 

[S.J.]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

That link doesn't back up your claim. Where does Barr say "a sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? You're desperate. And I'm sure you would love for Barr to recuse himself so you could have Rosenstein or some other Trump hater spin Mueller's report to your liking but Barr is not a shrinking violet like Jeff Sessions so I guess that means you're shit out of luck there. Mueller clearly said that neither Trump, nor any member of his campaign colluded with Russia. No evidence means no evidence and you can't spin that. Sucks for you, doesn't it?

So, you read the memo? You must be the first one?

I don't wanna hear your bullshit and whining, I want you to answer the question. When did Barr tell the world that "A sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? Let's see it.

 

[BWK]

Barr should be recused from anything that has anything to do with this investigation, based on Barr giving an opinion over a year ago, telling the world that a sitting president cannot be held accountable for obstruction, rendering Trump "above the law."

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

That link doesn't back up your claim. Where does Barr say "a sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? You're desperate. And I'm sure you would love for Barr to recuse himself so you could have Rosenstein or some other Trump hater spin Mueller's report to your liking but Barr is not a shrinking violet like Jeff Sessions so I guess that means you're shit out of luck there. Mueller clearly said that neither Trump, nor any member of his campaign colluded with Russia. No evidence means no evidence and you can't spin that. Sucks for you, doesn't it?

So, you read the memo? You must be the first one?

I don't wanna hear your bullshit and whining, I want you to answer the question. When did Barr tell the world that "A sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? Let's see it.

“We don't want this determination being made by the attorney general, who is appointed by this president and some could argue was appointed specifically because of his view on the expansive power of the executive and the likelihood that a president can't ever commit obstruction of justice, which we know is not true,” Cicilline said.

That is the article quoting Barr on his views about obstruction.

And did you read the memo? No! Which means you were lying. Mueller never said that Trump didn't or did collude, because we haven't read the memo yet.

What will come out of this is, he did collude, but it wasn't with a Russian government official, because they couldn't prove the lawyer was a government official working for Putin. But it maybe a different story with Manafort/Gates in the polling data scandal. Or it maybe proven with Roger Stone.

 

[Dale Smith]

Despite attacks, media will keep doing its job: Joe

We haven't even seen the memo from Mueller yet, other than the edited summary by Bill Barr, who gives his opinion. Bill Barr didn't bother to mention that Mueller said as it pertains to obstruction, "there were difficult issues with the law and facts". Meaning, that Congress would need to decide, not him. We got that quote from the media. Does that mean that Mueller is exonerating Trump for obstruction? Hell no it doesn't. That's why he said "he wasn't exonerated". But Bill Barr decided over a year ago that a president "cannot obstruct justice. " What? That's the same thing as saying Trump is above the law.

Trump paid porn stars for which that money was not reported, it was reimbursed to the guy who fronted thev money, Trump and Jr. have their names on the checks for reimbursement, and the guy who paid the money is going to jail. And the guy who should be in jail right now, plus the son, paid that money to be the president of the US, making him an illegally elected POTUS. And this person should be above the law according to Bill Barr? What kind of a Banana Republic is this?

And, in conclusion, once again, thanks to the media, we find out once again, with the hundreds of lies by the Trump administration about Russia, multiple indictments and convictions about Russia, we find out that Trump pays no consequences for obstruction of justice, for which a ruling comes from a guy who should have been recused from this investigation for stating that a sitting president is above the law.

Thank you media for the heads up, while Trump takes out vengeance for his lies the media exposed.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! When does the "smiting" begin, oh mighty smiter of the Trump voter????? I gotta little somethin' somethin' for the leftard clown posse of frothing at the mouth, sniveling commie pussies.


(snicker)

You are too immature to debate anything. Take a hike.

Hey, you were wanting to "smite" the Trump voters, dumb ass.....so when does it begin , punkinpuss? Or were you simply all talk? I suspect that is the case. The commie leftard's reputation for being physically unimposing, effeminate and weak is well earned. You don't wish to debate, you wish to spew angst.

So, debate this, why wasn't Trump exonerated for obstruction? And where did Mueller put the investigation into Stone for coordinating with Wikileaks about getting the stolen emails to the Russian spy organization Gucifer 2.0? What about the investigation of Manafort and Gates for handing off polling data to the Russian government? Can you debate that? Were those investigations passed off to SDNY?

Gucifer 2.0 was CIA allllll the way. We know this from the Vault leaks. Stone wanted to ingratiate himself with Assange and Wikileaks when the forthcoming data from the DNC server ( courtesy of Seth Rich) was to be released and it had NOTHING to do with Russian "hackers". The download speed, amount of information made it impossible to be done unless it was done BEHIND the firewall. I will accept the educated experience of someone like William Binney over DNC friendly "CrowdStrike" any day of the week. Leftards claiming that 17 three lettered alphabet agencies back the contentions of CrowdStrike will conveniently over look the fact that they based their contentions of the alleged findings of "CrowdStrike" without ever being given the DNC server themselves in order to do forensic tests on.

Hope this helps!!!!

 

[S.J.]

That's not what he said. You're either stupid or you're a liar. I think both.

Barr authored memo last year ruling out obstruction of justice - CNNPolitics You are the liar.

That link doesn't back up your claim. Where does Barr say "a sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? You're desperate. And I'm sure you would love for Barr to recuse himself so you could have Rosenstein or some other Trump hater spin Mueller's report to your liking but Barr is not a shrinking violet like Jeff Sessions so I guess that means you're shit out of luck there. Mueller clearly said that neither Trump, nor any member of his campaign colluded with Russia. No evidence means no evidence and you can't spin that. Sucks for you, doesn't it?

So, you read the memo? You must be the first one?

I don't wanna hear your bullshit and whining, I want you to answer the question. When did Barr tell the world that "A sitting President cannot be held accountable for obstruction"? Let's see it.

“We don't want this determination being made by the attorney general, who is appointed by this president and some could argue was appointed specifically because of his view on the expansive power of the executive and the likelihood that a president can't ever commit obstruction of justice, which we know is not true,” Cicilline said.

That is the article quoting Barr on his views about obstruction.

And did you read the memo? No! Which means you were lying. Mueller never said that Trump didn't or did collude, because we haven't read the memo yet.

What will come out of this is, he did collude, but it wasn't with a Russian government official, because they couldn't prove the lawyer was a government official working for Putin. But it maybe a different story with Manafort/Gates in the polling data scandal. Or it maybe proven with Roger Stone.

IOW you can't produce a link to back up your ridiculous claim. And if Barr was lying about what Mueller said in his report, why then are the two of them working together to determine how much of the report can be made public? Why don't you get back to me when you have an actual argument?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Let's see.....

We are at 2 years 2 months and.....

How are those impeachment proceedings coming ?