The ads are disgusting. WTF USMB?

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Again, a reminder, you can click off the offensive stuff.

Then they quit sending you stuff like that.

Less trouble than posting a bitch about the ads, which, btw, keep the site free.

AdBlocker saves the trouble of even doing that. I see ZERO ads.

 

[Skull Pilot]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

ad block plus.

install it and quit whining.

 

[Camp]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

 

[ChrisL]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Lol! Did you click on it?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

 

[ChrisL]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

Well, to be fair, the ad does not show her vagina or anything at all really. I do agree that it is kind of poor taste, but it is not porn. There is no sex and it shows nothing.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

You have three choices

1) keep whining
2) Install Ad Block Plus
3) Hit the bricks

Personally I'm rooting for 3

 

[Ravi]

Ad Block plus does not work on ipads to block taboola. I've found nothing that blocks taboola on my ipad.

 

[BlueGin]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Ad Block plus does not work on ipads to block taboola. I've found nothing that blocks taboola on my ipad.

Ravi , try this Weblock - AdBlock for iOS on the App Store on iTunes its worth the $1.99

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

I'm just going to put you on ignore. Life's too short.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

I'm just going to put you on ignore. Life's too short.

LOL whatever pervert

 

[Howey]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Umm...ads are based upon your own google searches.

 

[ChrisL]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Umm...ads are based upon your own google searches.

I don't think that's the case with these particular ads. I have ad blocker, but I turned it off to check out these ads, and yes, I saw the woman too.

 

[ChrisL]

A woman taking a picture of her vag? An eye socket full of thorns?

I can't respond to any post without being subjected to the most hideous images. If the idea is to get me to click on advertiser links out of intrigue, you've failed miserably. All it does is piss me off.

You should really get some more tasteful advertising.

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

What has got you so upset anyways? Why do you care if he's naked in front of his kids? I really don't see what the big deal is. Though my parents didn't walk around in front of me naked on purpose, there were times when I've seen them naked. It's not the end of the world.

 

[Judicial review]

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

What has got you so upset anyways? Why do you care if he's naked in front of his kids? I really don't see what the big deal is. Though my parents didn't walk around in front of me naked on purpose, there were times when I've seen them naked. It's not the end of the world.

Thank you. A real human ladies and gentleman.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Personally, I would not describe a woman taking a picture of her vagina to be hideous. I understand I might be being judgmental, not having seen the vagina in question, but in general, I do not find photo's of vagina's to be hideous.

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

What has got you so upset anyways? Why do you care if he's naked in front of his kids? I really don't see what the big deal is. Though my parents didn't walk around in front of me naked on purpose, there were times when I've seen them naked. It's not the end of the world.

I'm not upset, I merely think he's a pervert.

 

[ChrisL]

Neither do I, but pornography is a matter of context and this ad was designed to be sexually charged. That's not naturism, that's porn. But before you go looking for it, you don't actually see the vag. It's a side view of a woman on her back in a bathing suit with her legs spread and pulled up and her holding a cell phone facing her crotch. If people want porn they can go to a porn site. Nobody deserves to have it shoved in their faces unsolicited.

They are just catering to their behind the scenes sexting regulars. Apparently they know their audience.

And it's embarrassing they think I'm that audience. I don't look at porn, don't know how I gave them the idea that would appeal to me.

So you prance around naked in front of your kids, but don't watch porn? That's your story?

What has got you so upset anyways? Why do you care if he's naked in front of his kids? I really don't see what the big deal is. Though my parents didn't walk around in front of me naked on purpose, there were times when I've seen them naked. It's not the end of the world.

I'm not upset, I merely think he's a pervert.

Why? Nudity doesn't bother some people. I have a girlfriend who walks around naked in front of her kids. She's not a pervert. She just isn't very modest when it comes to her body.