2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,220
- 52,455
Yes, of course safe storage sounds like a great idea....as do most of the gun laws that sound nice and harmless....and then you look at what the anti gunners actually put into the law...and then you realize that the only one getting screwed by the law is the honest, innocent, law abiding citizen...while the criminals do what they want....as usual...
Here is how the great idea of safe storage laws are applied in Britain....surprise home inspections...
Brit Loses Shotgun License for Failing to Close Cabinet Lock - The Truth About Guns
What a joke...
Here is how the great idea of safe storage laws are applied in Britain....surprise home inspections...
Brit Loses Shotgun License for Failing to Close Cabinet Lock - The Truth About Guns
An inspection that could lead to firearms confiscation. In this case, centralsomersetgazette.com reports that the police entered David Robert Meek’s home “while making enquiries about a separate matter.” Does it matter? Nope. In The Land of Hope and Glory (as well as Canada), the police have the right to inspect any shotgun license holder’s home whenever they wish. And here’s what they found in Mr. Meek’s proverbial castle . . .
“When they inspected the inside of his house they found a gun cabinet with the padlock not securely clicked into place with three shotguns and a rifle inside which were therefore accessible,” he said.
“This was in contravention of the licence he held which stated that the cabinet must be locked at all times to prevent access by unauthorised people.”
Defending solicitor Gareth Webb said Meek was a self-employed lorry driver who had held shotgun licences for 40 years and considered himself a responsible person.
He said his client only used the shotguns if he went rabbit shooting but the rifle was a vastly more powerful weapon.
“If he takes it out he phones the police and gives them a long number and on September 24 he went out duck shooting and could have sworn that he closed the padlock because he remembered doing so,” he said.
“However he pushed it together and it obviously did not engage and was therefore not closed.
So the cops tugged on the lock and it opened. And Mr. Meek’s gun rights – such as they were – went out the window. In court, it turned out that the shotgun owner was Meek by name as well as nature.
“He accepts this was a serious problem because that would allow someone to go into the house and access the guns and he is a responsible member of the community who has admitted this offence.”
What a joke...