The Benghazi Timeline

[DarkFury]

Once you remove the rumors the maybe's you are let with the FACTS. Short video here puts ALL the KNOWN facts together in a time line. It's also going to leave you with a VERY strong idea of just how stupid and unable current White House leadership is.

And it speaks to the Clinton issue as to what did she know and when did she know it?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

 

[DarkFury]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

. Move on
You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

There is no need to. I know the story backwards and forwards. It's dead, Jim, just like Stevens and his team. Move on.

 

[DarkFury]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

. Move on
You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

There is no need to. I know the story backwards and forwards. It's dead, Jim, just like Stevens and his team. Move on.

Well at least you ADMIT you are to stupid to view content BEFORE comment. Next.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

. Move on
You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

There is no need to. I know the story backwards and forwards. It's dead, Jim, just like Stevens and his team. Move on.

Well at least you ADMIT you are to stupid to view content BEFORE comment. Next.

I rarely view propaganda.

 

[DarkFury]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

. Move on
You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

There is no need to. I know the story backwards and forwards. It's dead, Jim, just like Stevens and his team. Move on.

Well at least you ADMIT you are to stupid to view content BEFORE comment. Next.

I rarely view propaganda.

I guess that means when your life flashes before you, you will be changing channels?

 

[depotoo]

He asked for more security. He was denied , as well as some of what they had, was even removed.

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

 

[depotoo]

No you don't. You obviously know the altered progressive story

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

. Move on
You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

There is no need to. I know the story backwards and forwards. It's dead, Jim, just like Stevens and his team. Move on.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The graphics alone scream "Don't bother clicking on the video!"

If it were presented in a non alarmist way it might, might be worth clicking on.

It's similar to your screen name and avatar. Should angry, alarmist misanthrope and expecting to be taken seriously? What is wrong with the whole picture here?

 

[DarkFury]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Nothing partisan about that time line. Just the facts.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

Fluffers gotta Fluff

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

He asked for more security. He was denied , as well as some of what they had, was even removed.

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

you're wasting your time on this one. He imagine keeping it as a discussion on an web message board will somehow magically convert the masses into viewing the world as he does...angry and alarmed

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Nothing partisan about that time line. Just the facts.

select and cherry picked and distorted? yeah, ok

 

[jknowgood]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

No actually, it's about the lies that were told for no reason.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

The video has a headline: "Why Benghazi matters" Not about a timeline. It is about a timeline meant to show why otherwise normal people should buy into the line that the Secretary of State was to blame. "Terrorists don't kill people. The US Secretary of State does"

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

No actually, it's about the lies that were told for no reason.

Even if true, which I do not believe:
What would that have to do with the attack itself?

see?

Politically motivated witch hunt

 

[DarkFury]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Nothing partisan about that time line. Just the facts.

select and cherry picked and distorted? yeah, ok

YOU said it called out only Hillary for blame. If you had watched the video you would know that is NOT true. Which MEANS you never watched it either did you? Comment with no view of content. NEXT.

 

[DarkFury]

No actually, it's about the lies that were told for no reason.

Even if true, which I do not believe:
What would that have to do with the attack itself?

see?

Politically motivated witch hunt

Why are you AFRAID to SEE what she knew and when she knew it? Oh, she makes you look like a liar or a fool you say? A liar if you don't and a fool if you do.