The Benghazi Timeline

[tigerred59]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

Agreed, but Obama is a tool who listens to these conservative Bush generals who would die if they didn't have a war to attend.

So why vote for him?

Cause Mit Robme wasn't an option.....LOLOLOLO

 

[Claudette]

Nope you are the one who doesn't want reality. And the one who's full of shit.

Your content to believe there is no blame for Hilbat and her State Department.

Four men are dead and you could care less. Just goes to show, you can't cure stupid.

Of course the government is to blame for terrorists.

Nope Hilbat and her State Department are to blame.

They did nothing even though the ambassador, the dead ambassador, wanted more security and they had months of warnings.

The Brits and the Red Cross pulled out because of those same warnings. That's what we should have done.

The fact that you assign no blame to Hillbat and her State Department tells me that you are willing to overlook just about anything when it comes to Hilbat.

You will turn a blind eye to anything not showing that POS in a good light.

Of course if your brother had been killed at Benghazi you'd be singing an entirely different tune. You'd be screaming for answers and assigning blame where it belongs.

On that gutless wonder Hillbat and her less than competent State Department.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

It;s almost impossible to follow any argument you may be trying to make when you post in such a childish manner

 

[Claudette]

...

It;s almost impossible to follow any argument you may be trying to make when you post in such a childish manner

Its simple really and if you weren't such a rabid fan of Hillbat you'd see it no problem.

Her State Department fucked up and four men died.

The buck stops at her desk and always will.

Common sense 101.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

It;s almost impossible to follow any argument you may be trying to make when you post in such a childish manner

Its simple really and if you weren't such a rabid fan of Hillbat you'd see it no problem.

Her State Department fucked up and four men died.

The buck stops at her desk and always will.

Common sense 101.

there you go again...

most people do not listen to people when they rant in childspeak

 

[mudwhistle]

Another Timeline


September 2012 - Attack on Benghazi US Diplomatic Compound,
December 2012 - Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs report released,
April 2013 - House Committee on the Judiciary report released,
September 2013 - House Committee on Foreign Affairs report released,
September 2013 - House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform interim report released,
January 2014 - Senate Intelligence Committee report released,
February 2014 - House Committee on Armed Services report released,
November 2014 - House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report released,
June 2015 - House Select Committee on Benghazi exceeds $3.5 million in costs
August 2015 - Rep. Kevin McCarthy admits that House Select Committee on Benghazi was formed to attack Hillary Clinton,
October 2015 - Rep. Hanna confirms that House Select Committee on Benghazi was formed to attack Hillary Clinton,
October 2015 - Major Bradley Podliska reveals that House Select Committee on Benghazi was focused on politically attacking Hillary Clinton,
September 2015 - House Select Committee on Benghazi exceeds Watergate investigation length,

You left out lots of stuff.

Like all of those terrorists Obama was gonna bring to justice.

OJ said the same thing btw.

 

[Claudette]

...

It;s almost impossible to follow any argument you may be trying to make when you post in such a childish manner

Its simple really and if you weren't such a rabid fan of Hillbat you'd see it no problem.

Her State Department fucked up and four men died.

The buck stops at her desk and always will.

Common sense 101.

there you go again...

most people do not listen to people when they rant in childspeak

Oh so you think they would have wasted their ammunition and time and attacked Benghazi when there was no one there??

If that's your thought process then you truly are an idiot.

Ah Well. You can't cure stupid.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

It;s almost impossible to follow any argument you may be trying to make when you post in such a childish manner

Its simple really and if you weren't such a rabid fan of Hillbat you'd see it no problem.

Her State Department fucked up and four men died.

The buck stops at her desk and always will.

Common sense 101.

there you go again...

most people do not listen to people when they rant in childspeak

Oh so you think they would have wasted their ammunition and time and attacked Benghazi when there was no one there??

If that's your thought process then you truly are an idiot.

Ah Well. You can't cure stupid.

What are you talking about?

 

[hadit]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

JEsus you had a poor fool's habit of mistaking correlation for cause and effect

now post less, and pay attention more

So, are you saying that leaving Gaddafi in power would have had no effect on the event?

 

[hadit]

So why vote for him?

Not addressed to Dante but show you how foolish you are, Who do you think Dante voted for in 2008?

I'll let Dante address that if he/she wishes to address it. Feel free to do the same.

 

[hadit]

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

Agreed, but Obama is a tool who listens to these conservative Bush generals who would die if they didn't have a war to attend.

So why vote for him?

Cause Mit Robme wasn't an option.....LOLOLOLO

Actually, he was. You might not have liked the option, but he was an option.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

So, are you saying that leaving Gaddafi in power would have had no effect on the event?

not at all

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Right-wing version:

Stevens, who made the call, gets no blame.
Clinton, who didn't make the call, gets all the blame.
Repeat, endlessly.

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

JEsus you had a poor fool's habit of mistaking correlation for cause and effect

now post less, and pay attention more

So, are you saying that leaving Gaddafi in power would have had no effect on the event?

go back further. Using your bs method, if Bush had not caused Muammar Gaddafi to give up his nukes...

See? See how stupid your logic is?

 

[hadit]

You commented three minutes AFTER it was posted and the video is longer then that! You NEVER looked at the content. What a BOZO!

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

JEsus you had a poor fool's habit of mistaking correlation for cause and effect

now post less, and pay attention more

So, are you saying that leaving Gaddafi in power would have had no effect on the event?

go back further. Using your bs method, if Bush had not caused Muammar Gaddafi to give up his nukes...

See? See how stupid your logic is?

It was a GOOD thing that Gaddafi gave up his nukes, so I don't see your problem. IOW, we had a dictator who, while no friend of the US, feared the US. That was a good thing, yes? He was deposed with Obama's and HIllary's support, which empowered anti-US forces. That was not a good thing, no?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

In their defense, there is NOTHING new in your partisan attacks and attempt to personally blame the Secretary of State.

The Benghazi thing is not about what happened in Libya, it's about going after Hillary Clinton. Your intellectual dishonesty here is what makes you suspect when it comes to credibility and being taken seriously

Lost in the Benghazi story is this. It would not have happened had Obama (with Hillary cheering him on) uprooted Gaddafi. No one seems to remember that he gave up his nuke aspirations when he saw what happened to Saddam. It was removing him that empowered those who attacked the embassy.

JEsus you had a poor fool's habit of mistaking correlation for cause and effect

now post less, and pay attention more

So, are you saying that leaving Gaddafi in power would have had no effect on the event?

go back further. Using your bs method, if Bush had not caused Muammar Gaddafi to give up his nukes...

See? See how stupid your logic is?

It was a GOOD thing that Gaddafi gave up his nukes, so I don't see your problem. IOW, we had a dictator who, while no friend of the US, feared the US. That was a good thing, yes? He was deposed with Obama's and HIllary's support, which empowered anti-US forces. That was not a good thing, no?

There are always unintended consequences. You tried putting blame on an event on one group by going back to a particular event. Your example, it was cause and effect in a vacuum. You ignore earlier actions. Why? Only to put blame on one group. Why? An ideological/political attack.

Your example is a text book one of an argument being disingenuous

 

[Claudette]

The only fundamental thing anyone has to know is that they had months of warnings and did nothing.

Common Sense which you seem to lack.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The only fundamental thing anyone has to know is that they had months of warnings and did nothing.

Common Sense which you seem to lack.

Did nothing? There you go again...

 

[Claudette]

The only fundamental thing anyone has to know is that they had months of warnings and did nothing.

Common Sense which you seem to lack.

Did nothing? There you go again...

Of course they did nothing. That's why the ambassador and three other men are dead.

If they had done something like add more security or closed the embassy and consulate those men would still be alive.

If you can't see that then you are one dumb bastard.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The only fundamental thing anyone has to know is that they had months of warnings and did nothing.

Common Sense which you seem to lack.

Did nothing? There you go again...

Of course they did nothing. That's why the ambassador and three other men are dead.

If they had done something like add more security or closed the embassy and consulate those men would still be alive.

If you can't see that then you are one dumb bastard.

now you're arguing a political view of reality

 

[Claudette]

The only fundamental thing anyone has to know is that they had months of warnings and did nothing.

Common Sense which you seem to lack.

Did nothing? There you go again...

Of course they did nothing. That's why the ambassador and three other men are dead.

If they had done something like add more security or closed the embassy and consulate those men would still be alive.

If you can't see that then you are one dumb bastard.

now you're arguing a political view of reality

Nope. Just stating a fact.

A fact that if you weren't such a partisan hack you would see.