Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
They also could have been here a long time. And it's hidden from us.
). We also know they won't be explained. They'll remain unidentified, i.e. hidden. Isn't that what you just said? We just agreed 
.
There you go again insisting that aliens will use the same steel as humans to build some sort of craft that you imagine they would.Omg that's so funny. The jellyfish, or whowever they enslave, has to have the bone structure and dexterity to mine and construct metal tools to build a spaceship, and create the fuel.
It's not going to be a jellyfish! Lol!
How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Don't say dumb shit like this in the science section.yet we are obviously alone. Real scientists think so.
Irony personifiedDon't say dumb shit like this in the science section.yet we are obviously alone. Real scientists think so.
Troll personified.Irony personified
Must be embarrassing getting a particle physics lecture from a trollTroll personified.Irony personified
How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
God I hate to to agree with you, however you are clearly correct.How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sterile water has a zero ability to form either complicated or even very simple codes that compose lifeHow do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
Hey numbnuts tidal pools are only stable for a short period until the next high tide when they are flushed clean.How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
How do you know any of thisAnd, I dont know if there is another liquid that we know of that is better than our H2-O , being an unstable molecule it breaks down other things through oxidation to the point that organisms can feed off them. As i understand it a sea of liquid methane for example couldn't support life because its a stable molecule.
No question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
You have some weird science. Amino acids do not form in water. They were suppose to form in space due to lightning and volcanic gas mixture and fall into the oceans, lakes, and ponds in order form primordial soup, but the water dissolves them. Thus, the new theory is life formed in the air just above the water and then fell into the water. We do not see any of this happen today, nor has anyone demonstrated this via experiment. You can talk about all the DNA chains that you want, but amino acids do not form in water. Even if you did form amino acids which is doubtful, then it would be even more of a stretch for them to become proteins. Experiments have debunked formation of amino acids, but evolutionists still believe that they form in the atmosphere or geysers or air layers.
How do you know any of thisNo question, water is necessary for life, but not abiogenesis. Many times, I've had a shot of Jack for example, and a water back. Water is an universal solvent, so it works against abiogenesis. Too bad.
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
You have some weird science. Amino acids do not form in water. They were suppose to form in space due to lightning and volcanic gas mixture and fall into the oceans, lakes, and ponds in order form primordial soup, but the water dissolves them. Thus, the new theory is life formed in the air just above the water and then fell into the water. We do not see any of this happen today, nor has anyone demonstrated this via experiment. You can talk about all the DNA chains that you want, but amino acids do not form in water. Even if you did form amino acids which is doubtful, then it would be even more of a stretch for them to become proteins. Experiments have debunked formation of amino acids, but evolutionists still believe that they form in the atmosphere or geysers or air layers.
Funny, I always thought "my" science was just science! And I never knew there were volcanoes and lightning in space! And I never knew water destroyed aminos considering that half of them form in your body (mostly water) and the other half form in the foods we eat (also full of water). Boy, you are just so far ahead of the rest of us you should write a book. It was always my understanding that the first aminos likely formed in the ocean (water again) in a process involving certain types of rocks and sea water called serpentization. But what would I know, I don't have your grasp of (real) science.
. Secular science with its big bang and explanations of what happened is insufficient. It does not describe how we got to where we are today, i.e. the universe, Earth, and everything in it. Even the quantum scientists like Hawking thought we shouldn't be here. Besides abiogenesis, do you believe in multiverses, too? There is no evidence for that either. Maybe you just believe whatever the secular/atheist scientists make up (influenced by the other sky fairy, Satan).
How do you know any of this
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
You have some weird science. Amino acids do not form in water. They were suppose to form in space due to lightning and volcanic gas mixture and fall into the oceans, lakes, and ponds in order form primordial soup, but the water dissolves them. Thus, the new theory is life formed in the air just above the water and then fell into the water. We do not see any of this happen today, nor has anyone demonstrated this via experiment. You can talk about all the DNA chains that you want, but amino acids do not form in water. Even if you did form amino acids which is doubtful, then it would be even more of a stretch for them to become proteins. Experiments have debunked formation of amino acids, but evolutionists still believe that they form in the atmosphere or geysers or air layers.
Funny, I always thought "my" science was just science! And I never knew there were volcanoes and lightning in space! And I never knew water destroyed aminos considering that half of them form in your body (mostly water) and the other half form in the foods we eat (also full of water). Boy, you are just so far ahead of the rest of us you should write a book. It was always my understanding that the first aminos likely formed in the ocean (water again) in a process involving certain types of rocks and sea water called serpentization. But what would I know, I don't have your grasp of (real) science.
If you think abiogenesis is real, then you are subscribing to fake science. It has been debunked already. I just called it weird science because you believe what you described when there is no evidence and we do not see it happen. If you had something, then you would be able to describe how amino acids form in wherever you said, how it forms proteins, and how they end up becoming life. Creation scientists have explained how this happens in the cell. What do you know -- science backs up the Bible.
There should be experiments to back abiogenesis up. Instead, what us skeptics are subjected to is "faith based" science. Maybe you believe volcanoes and lightning in space. You're the one who described it as such
Experiment. Amino acids dissolve in water. Kaput. No primordial soup in the ocean. Now, Fort Fun Indiana and the atheist scientists are focusing they formed over the air just above the ocean. They believe anything their magic sky fairy Satan tells them.
Sorry, no. The fact that water is such a perfect solvent which allows a myriad chemical reactions in the first place is what allowed amino acids to form, in a world chemistry quite different from today. And the primordial soup did not occur in the ocean per se, it occurred in discrete tidal pools under fixed, stable conditions which eventually allowed the beginnings of life, the first prokaryotes to appear and eventually spread.
You have some weird science. Amino acids do not form in water. They were suppose to form in space due to lightning and volcanic gas mixture and fall into the oceans, lakes, and ponds in order form primordial soup, but the water dissolves them. Thus, the new theory is life formed in the air just above the water and then fell into the water. We do not see any of this happen today, nor has anyone demonstrated this via experiment. You can talk about all the DNA chains that you want, but amino acids do not form in water. Even if you did form amino acids which is doubtful, then it would be even more of a stretch for them to become proteins. Experiments have debunked formation of amino acids, but evolutionists still believe that they form in the atmosphere or geysers or air layers.
Funny, I always thought "my" science was just science! And I never knew there were volcanoes and lightning in space! And I never knew water destroyed aminos considering that half of them form in your body (mostly water) and the other half form in the foods we eat (also full of water). Boy, you are just so far ahead of the rest of us you should write a book. It was always my understanding that the first aminos likely formed in the ocean (water again) in a process involving certain types of rocks and sea water called serpentization. But what would I know, I don't have your grasp of (real) science.
If you think abiogenesis is real, then you are subscribing to fake science. It has been debunked already. I just called it weird science because you believe what you described when there is no evidence and we do not see it happen. If you had something, then you would be able to describe how amino acids form in wherever you said, how it forms proteins, and how they end up becoming life. Creation scientists have explained how this happens in the cell. What do you know -- science backs up the Bible.
There should be experiments to back abiogenesis up. Instead, what us skeptics are subjected to is "faith based" science. Maybe you believe volcanoes and lightning in space. You're the one who described it as such
Bond, you are just one more USMB idiot who parades himself around claiming far more than you really know.
It is pointless talking about theories of universal creation, other universes, etc., when by their very nature, one cannot "prove" other universes outside their own, it is all theory, just as is theist vs. atheist. Though I believe in God, no one can prove or disprove him. Same with YOUR theory: you can no more prove aminos formed over water than at the bottom of the ocean because that was a long time ago and those conditions don't exist anymore.
- SHOW ME where I said I believed in volcanoes and lightning in space. YOU said that.
- Show me where I said anything about Creationism.
THE ONE THING WE DO KNOW is that at one time there was no life. There was a time before there was life on this planet, then slowly, microbial life began and evolved into more complex levels, so life came from non-life. You don't have to be an atheist to know that.
That and every scientist on the planet now believes in the strong likelihood of there being life in the subsurface oceans on Europa and Enceladus, where there is no choice but it having formed in the deep ocean near smokers.
