Amelia
Rookie
- Banned
- #141
And so the semantic games continue. Did he or didn't he. The "no acts of terror" reference certainly was not direct enough for Crowley to jump in with a "correction".
And it wasn't ambiguous enough for Romney to use as an attack. Look, Romney tried it; Obama had a good counter punch. it didn't work out for Romney. Instead of blaming the moderator, you guys should pull your pants up and move on. This is a rather pathetic display.
You guys are the ones treating it like a debate gimmick. Like what matters in this situation is whether Obama scored a point or not.
This is dead serious and Obama isn't treating it that way. This is about security and about the ongoing lies by Obama and his administration. Obama's success is measured in how smoothly he pulls things over on us, and that sucks. Especially because he's not doing it smoothly at all. If he were actually going to keep a secret and not leak it to the New York Times so they could tell how wonderful he was, that would be kind of cool. I admire truly covert activity in the name of national security. But Obama isn't covert. He's coy. And his blatant lies suck.
For four years now we've dealt with Democrats taking serious matters lightly to give Obama a break and the media treating it as their privilege to cover up for him. And we've been complaining about it for four years.
This isn't about points scored in a debate. This isn't about Romney. This is about what a slimeball Obama is and how you guys are celebrating that he gets away with it.