Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do but I don't think the founding fathers meant to include nuclear arms in the 2nd.Yep. All of them and more. Do you not know what the word “arms” means?
So you get to pick and choose what parts of the Constitution are legally binding?Neither. A “well regulated militia” was the the why. It was the reason for the amendment. It is the prefatory clause and has such, has zero legal binding.
Wow! So if a SCOTUS disagrees with you they are either uneducated, dishonest, or both?That’s not even remotely true. Not true at all. That’s just the propaganda of the disingenuous left who is super pissed off the U.S. Constitution prevents them from controlling everything and everyone.
When the US Constitution was ratified, there was total agreement on what it said (just as there is today by everyone educated and honest).
Seems to me that if they could agree and the definition of 'arms' they would have included it. They choose not to.Man, you really should have read that article before posting a link to it. Because it defeated your own argument
Words have meaning. Pretending like the founders meant “muskets” when they wrote “arms” in a legally binding document is so disingenuous and unethical.
You know what it says. I know what it says. It’s time the left grew up and dropped the act.
What traditional marriage do you mean? Polygamy, 13-year-old brides, wives that could not inherit or own property?So progressive policy supports traditional marriage? Because traditional marriage is traditional American culture and values.
Most Americans support gay marriage so it is now an American tradition.Good, glad we agree that there is no place in society for gay marriage!
If I bought one in Pakistan you'd be OK with me importing it?It does. Not remind me again which company manufactures nuclear missiles and how much they sell for?
Oh yeah - not a single company in the US sells nuclear missiles. So I guess that desperate stretch isn’t a real concern for you after all, uh?
Hypocrite! Where is your indignation over Soros's campaign donations? Gates? Bezos? Zuckerberg? Yeah, those are actual people that are part of that 1% in your partisan cartoon. LMAO. Democrats.
I said what I said--They were DEMOCRATS. Why are you being so evasive in admitting it.Are you saying the Dixiecrats were not White, not Conservative, not Southern, and not Christian?
You are the poster child for CRT.
If you were capable, you can find plans for one in any library and have been able to for at least 40 years.If I bought one in Pakistan you'd be OK with me importing it?
You really have a problem with your attempts to spin reality in your inept attempts to justify your degenerate point of view. Tsk tsk tsk. Sucks to be you.What traditional marriage do you mean? Polygamy, 13-year-old brides, wives that could not inherit or own property?
I never said any different but you seem to have trouble accepting that was only one part of them and not even the most important part.I said what I said--They were DEMOCRATS. Why are you being so evasive in admitting it.
I'm fine accepting reality, it is you who have only a distant, fleeting relationship with it.You really have a problem with your attempts to spin reality in your inept attempts to justify your degenerate point of view. Tsk tsk tsk. Sucks to be you.
You have avoided that admission in every post while trying to make republicans out to be boogey men. You are very transparent.I never said any different but you seem to have trouble accepting that was only one part of them and not even the most important part.
I didn't claim that "traditional" marriage included polygamy and 13 year old wives. Naw, you don't attempt to spin reality. You wouldn't do that, would you? BULLSHIT.I'm fine accepting reality, it is you who have only a distant, fleeting relationship with it.
Oh, I get it, only your traditions are real traditions. Other people's traditions are perversions, even if they were the norms in different times and different places.I didn't claim that "traditional" marriage included polygamy and 13 year old wives. Naw, you don't attempt to spin reality. You wouldn't do that, would you? BULLSHIT.
I didn't dispute the Democrats/Dixiecrats historically being the party of slavery and never mentioned Republicans whereas you avoided admitting the Dixiecrats were also White, Conservative, Southern, and Christian.You have avoided that admission in every post while trying to make republicans out to be boogey men. You are very transparent.
When you show that the majority of traditional marriages are polygamy, or child brides, or degenerate homosexuals or transconfused then they will become traditional. They are fringe at best and never even scratch the surface of mainstream. Many people practice the tradition of drinking their own urine for health reasons--would you consider this traditional?Oh, I get it, only your traditions are real traditions. Other people's traditions are perversions, even if they were the norms in different times and different places.
Because it is irrelevant to the discussion in the OP. Are you trying to claim that there are no white, southern, Christian progressives? Keep digging that hole or try to remember the subject of the OP.I didn't dispute the Democrats/Dixiecrats historically being the party of slavery and never mentioned Republicans whereas you avoided admitting the Dixiecrats were also White, Conservative, Southern, and Christian.
Polygamy was a tradition of Mormons for a time. I'd say same-sex marriage is now a traditional value in the US.When you show that the majority of traditional marriages are polygamy, or child brides, or degenerate homosexuals or transconfused then they will become traditional. They are fringe at best and never even scratch the surface of mainstream. Many people practice the tradition of drinking their own urine for health reasons--would you consider this traditional?
And it was specifically outlawed in the US. Again, a fringe of the overall population EVER practiced it.Polygamy was a tradition of Mormons for a time.
And you would be wrong. Less than 1/2 of 1% of all marriages in the US are between same sex couples. Yup, another fringe. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ne-percent-of-all-married-couples-in-the-u-s/I'd say same-sex marriage is now a traditional value in the US.
So are Democrats progressives or conservatives? Is slavery a tradition you want to preserve or bring back? HintBecause it is irrelevant to the discussion in the OP. Are you trying to claim that there are no white, southern, Christian progressives? Keep digging that hole or try to remember the subject of the OP.
Please show me where I intimated that I supported slavery. Quite the contrary, throughout this thread I have shown you that slavery was the exclusive policy of DEMOCRATS. All progressives are DEMOCRATS. No progressives are conservatives. You embrace progressives AND democrats, so I would be more inclined to believe that you support slavery by extension. This should clear things up for you but I'm not holding out much hope.So are Democrats progressives or conservatives? Is slavery a tradition you want to preserve or bring back? Hint
