The Clinton Exodus Begins

[Bush92]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

Independent voters breaking For Trump by double digits.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Read more: TargetSmart/William & Mary Florida Poll of Early and Likely Voters
https://www.scribd.com/document/329...-Mary-Florida-Poll-of-Early-and-Likely-Voters

TargetSmart/William & Mary Release Florida Poll of Early and Likely Voters
Source: TargetSmart/William & Mary


CONTACT: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
11/1/16

Coleman Bass TargetSmart Communications, LLC (443) 676-1803 [email protected]
TargetSmart/William & Mary Release Florida Poll of Early and Likely Voters
-Clinton Buoyed by Early Vote-

Hillary Clinton’s strength with the early vote in Florida is propelling her to a lead in the key battleground state, according to a new poll released today by TargetSmart and William & Mary. In the poll, Clinton holds a 48 to 40 percent lead over Donald Trump in the Sunshine State, a more advantageous position for Clinton than most other publicly available polling has suggested in the last week or so. As of the morning of November 1st , 2016, TargetSmart tracks that 3,695,359 people have already cast their votes in Florida.

 

[Billy000]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

And you for some reason think these independents think Trump's numerous scandals aren't all that bad?

 

[Coyote]

This is Michele Obama's twitter page. It's true. Warren, Obama and Michele are no longer following Hillary. You must have gotten bad information. Were you going by Snopes? They are known for getting it wrong. Snopes is probably trying to do damage control for the Clinton's. There are people tweeting on Michele Obama's twitter. It's active and Hillary isn't mentioned other than that she was removed by Warren, Obama and Michele and people are talking about it.

Snopes isn't attached to Clinton. In fact Snopes hadn't said anything when I posted. But, now they have: FALSE: Michelle Obama Scrubbed Hillary Clinton from Her Twitter Accounts

False.

I wasted some braincells and joined Twitter. The image you posted exists only in one twitter feed claiming what you are claiming. I can't find any credible sources supporting the OP's claim.

In fact, here is another article talking about this particular piece of fake news and fake news in general that the rightwing seems particularly susceptible to.

The progression of events illustrates how fake news stories expand and spread from fringe web sites to nationally syndicated radio shows with millions of listeners. In this case, the fake news originated on a dubious site called "Your News Wire," which publishes a mix of true, slanted and made-up news. Then, like a game of telephone, by the time the story got to Hannity, even the fake facts were wrong.


The site wrongly claimed that "Michelle Obama has scrubbed all references to Hillary Clinton from both of her Twitter accounts" and implied that it was the result of FBI investigations into Clinton.


A thicket of far-right-wing web sites picked up the story and ran with it. Red State Watcher said the news was "breaking!" and News Ninja 2012 said it was "suspicious." "The rats are jumping ship," The Gateway Pundit wrote.

Pro-Trump social media users tweeted about it, further amplifying the falsehood. And a contributor to a relatively credible web site, ForexLive.com, posted an item asking "Is the First Lady distancing the Obamas from the Clintons?"


Then new characters were added to the fake storyline. "Elizabeth Warren just unfollowed Hillary, and Michelle Obama deleted all her tweets about Hillary," Jack Posobiec, who calls himself a "recovering political operative," tweeted at 2 p.m. Tuesday. He kept going, adding President Obama's name to the list, without any evidence to back it up.


President Obama's @POTUS timeline includes recent tweets like "Couldn't be more proud of @HillaryClinton."


By 4 p.m., the made-up claims were on "The Sean Hannity Show."


First Hannity brought up the Gateway Pundit blog post -- which was predicated on a hoax -- and asked if it was true: "It says that Michelle Obama had deleted Hillary tweets from her timeline. Did you ever check that out?" The question is apparently directed at his producer.


Later in the hour, Hannity brought it up again. He was talking about revelations from the Wikileaks trove of stolen Clinton campaign emails when he began to read information about Warren and Obama, then said "What?"


A female voice chimed in to report: "Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren have both unfollowed Hillary Clinton, as well as scrubbing their timeline of tweets about her."


"Wow," Hannity said, and paused. "That means they know it's huge. You know why? Because Obama's implicated! He's implicated here, and he's pissed. You know what his legacy might be? Jail."


Some of Hannity's listeners believed him -- they shared the fake news via Twitter and Facebook. "wow this is getting good!" one Hannity fan tweeted.


Hannity did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the error.


But he tweeted after his show, "Correction. Live on radio I read a gateway pundit report that @MichelleObama had deleted mentions of HRC. And a listener said BHO and. Elizabeth Warren did same. Fact is they didn't. I humbly apologize. Live radio."


Then he emailed CNNMoney this explanation: "I received an e-mail LIVE ON THE AIR that linked a Gateway Pundit article. I questioned the accuracy of it on the air. I asked my producer on the air if it was true. She said it was. I also received a listener IM saying that they saw the same. Then THE listener mentioned that there was a report about the other 2."


Hannity continued: "Bottom line it was brought up in an insignificant way, I was dealing with more important issues like HRC crimes and lies and how CNN has been colluding with the Clinton campaign and CHEATING Bernie Sanders." ​

Isn't Snopes heavily funded by George Soros? Soros is backing Clinton.

No. It's only funding is through advertising revenues: http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asphttp://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

Also, this article debunks some of the rumors: Fact Check: So who's checking the fact-finders? We are

Who's check the fact-finders who are checking the fact-finders? Eh? Didn't think of that one, did ya'?

Homerun, Aaron.

Snopes isn't attached to Clinton. In fact Snopes hadn't said anything when I posted. But, now they have: FALSE: Michelle Obama Scrubbed Hillary Clinton from Her Twitter Accounts

False.

I wasted some braincells and joined Twitter. The image you posted exists only in one twitter feed claiming what you are claiming. I can't find any credible sources supporting the OP's claim.

In fact, here is another article talking about this particular piece of fake news and fake news in general that the rightwing seems particularly susceptible to.

The progression of events illustrates how fake news stories expand and spread from fringe web sites to nationally syndicated radio shows with millions of listeners. In this case, the fake news originated on a dubious site called "Your News Wire," which publishes a mix of true, slanted and made-up news. Then, like a game of telephone, by the time the story got to Hannity, even the fake facts were wrong.


The site wrongly claimed that "Michelle Obama has scrubbed all references to Hillary Clinton from both of her Twitter accounts" and implied that it was the result of FBI investigations into Clinton.


A thicket of far-right-wing web sites picked up the story and ran with it. Red State Watcher said the news was "breaking!" and News Ninja 2012 said it was "suspicious." "The rats are jumping ship," The Gateway Pundit wrote.

Pro-Trump social media users tweeted about it, further amplifying the falsehood. And a contributor to a relatively credible web site, ForexLive.com, posted an item asking "Is the First Lady distancing the Obamas from the Clintons?"


Then new characters were added to the fake storyline. "Elizabeth Warren just unfollowed Hillary, and Michelle Obama deleted all her tweets about Hillary," Jack Posobiec, who calls himself a "recovering political operative," tweeted at 2 p.m. Tuesday. He kept going, adding President Obama's name to the list, without any evidence to back it up.


President Obama's @POTUS timeline includes recent tweets like "Couldn't be more proud of @HillaryClinton."


By 4 p.m., the made-up claims were on "The Sean Hannity Show."


First Hannity brought up the Gateway Pundit blog post -- which was predicated on a hoax -- and asked if it was true: "It says that Michelle Obama had deleted Hillary tweets from her timeline. Did you ever check that out?" The question is apparently directed at his producer.


Later in the hour, Hannity brought it up again. He was talking about revelations from the Wikileaks trove of stolen Clinton campaign emails when he began to read information about Warren and Obama, then said "What?"


A female voice chimed in to report: "Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren have both unfollowed Hillary Clinton, as well as scrubbing their timeline of tweets about her."


"Wow," Hannity said, and paused. "That means they know it's huge. You know why? Because Obama's implicated! He's implicated here, and he's pissed. You know what his legacy might be? Jail."


Some of Hannity's listeners believed him -- they shared the fake news via Twitter and Facebook. "wow this is getting good!" one Hannity fan tweeted.


Hannity did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the error.


But he tweeted after his show, "Correction. Live on radio I read a gateway pundit report that @MichelleObama had deleted mentions of HRC. And a listener said BHO and. Elizabeth Warren did same. Fact is they didn't. I humbly apologize. Live radio."


Then he emailed CNNMoney this explanation: "I received an e-mail LIVE ON THE AIR that linked a Gateway Pundit article. I questioned the accuracy of it on the air. I asked my producer on the air if it was true. She said it was. I also received a listener IM saying that they saw the same. Then THE listener mentioned that there was a report about the other 2."


Hannity continued: "Bottom line it was brought up in an insignificant way, I was dealing with more important issues like HRC crimes and lies and how CNN has been colluding with the Clinton campaign and CHEATING Bernie Sanders." ​

Isn't Snopes heavily funded by George Soros? Soros is backing Clinton.

No. It's only funding is through advertising revenues: http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asphttp://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

Also, this article debunks some of the rumors: Fact Check: So who's checking the fact-finders? We are

I prefer to do my own fact checking and in the case of Obama and Michele going silent on Twitter this is what I found:

I also checked Elizabeth Warren's Twitter and she hasn't mentioned her since October 26 which in 2 hours is a full week. Before that she was tweeting daily about Hillary. Something has changed.

The ONLY place on Twitter I found that image was on one feed making that claim. I will look further.

That feed you mention is Barack Obama's official Twitter page. Check the month of October. He hasn't mentioned her in a month. Not once.
Elizabeth Warren was tweeting daily about Clinton up until a week ago and then total silence. No more tweets. Michele Obama's official Twitter page has stories about Obama's and Warren removing Hillary but no other mentions that I saw. I didn't check as far back on Michele's Twitter page as I did Barack Obama's.

A question - you repeatedly post that image - where does it come from? How do you view who follows who - and - which twitter account does it attach to? The Obama's, Warren, Clinton have multiple twitter accounts.

I looked at one of Obama's: Barack Obama (@BarackObama) | Twitter
Nothing about Clinton there. But nothing about Clinton a month ago either...so in this account he clearly didn't use it for discussing her or for that matter any political candidates - either recently or further back.

So I looked for Elizabeth Warren, found two accounts. The latest tweet in Elizabeth Warren (@elizabethforma) | Twitter

Elizabeth Warren ‏@elizabethforma Oct 26
Great day in Pittsburgh to get out the vote for @KatieMcGintyPA & @HillaryClinton!

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

 

[Coyote]

No. It's only funding is through advertising revenues: http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asphttp://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

Also, this article debunks some of the rumors: Fact Check: So who's checking the fact-finders? We are

And of course YOUR source of truth is truer than the OTHER sources of truth.

Thus far, your source hasn't proven it's case, particularly when multiple sources indicate quite the opposite.

And of course YOUR source of truth is truer than the OTHER sources of truth.

In this case, yes. I made the effort to actually sign up on Twitter and look for myself.

I did too, but now what do I do??? Of course I am clueless, I don't even have a facebook account....I talk to my friends on the phone...or in person....I like to talk, what can I say???

but, what am I suppose to do....select who I want to follow? And then what???? Is there some course I could take on this...???

Bwhaaaaaaa

Don't you kind of feel like Alice gone down the rabbit hole?

I'm not sure but...I don't think I'm going to do anything with it after today!

 

[charwin95]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

Who is Doug again? How many republicans current and retired that ditched and blasted Trump?

 

[Scorpion]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

And you for some reason think these independents think Trump's numerous scandals aren't all that bad?

Compared to national security and pay to play?
Yeah.

 

[Coyote]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

There is a breaking point with Trump as well.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Dems anxious over tightening race
Democrats are nervous.

Moody's Analytics election model predicts Clinton win
Source: Reuters

Low gas prices and President Barack Obama's high approval ratings are key factors that favor Democrat Hillary Clinton winning the White House in next week's election, according to a model from Moody's Analytics that has accurately predicted the last nine U.S. presidential contests.

Clinton is forecast to pick up 332 Electoral College votes against 206 for Republican Donald Trump, Moody's Analytics predicted on Tuesday in the final update of its model before Election Day on Nov. 8. That would match Obama's margin of victory over Republican challenger Mitt Romney in 2012.

The Reuters-Ipsos States of the Nation project also predicts a Clinton win, with a 95 percent probability of her winning at least 278 electoral votes. A candidate needs to win at least 270 electoral votes to be elected president.

The Moody's Analytics model is based on a combination of state-level economic conditions and political history, and has correctly called the outcome of each presidential election since Republican Ronald Reagan unseated Democrat Jimmy Carter in 1980.

Read more: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN12W56J

 

[Mrs. M.]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

Thus far, your source hasn't proven it's case, particularly when multiple sources indicate quite the opposite.

And of course YOUR source of truth is truer than the OTHER sources of truth.

In this case, yes. I made the effort to actually sign up on Twitter and look for myself.

I did too, but now what do I do??? Of course I am clueless, I don't even have a facebook account....I talk to my friends on the phone...or in person....I like to talk, what can I say???

but, what am I suppose to do....select who I want to follow? And then what???? Is there some course I could take on this...???

Bwhaaaaaaa

Just google the name of the person and put Twitter behind it. Their page will come up for you.

but then what Mrs.M? Can you give me a brief on how it all actually works?

Ok, I google a name, put twitter at the end and I will get whomever I am interested in and go to their twitter page....am I suppose to select follow? And what does "follow" give me? Their comments and messages they post? Can I answer what they have posted or comment on their post, where they will see me responding or do they have to follow me in order for them to see me responding??????????????????? HELPPPPPPPP!

I have no idea.....and how do I even respond to their post? And how do I start a post of my own?

Crud, I am exhausted just thinking about having to figure this out!

Type into the search engine Barack Obama Twitter you'll see official link and click that, then read the page and scroll down to read more. You don't have to join unless you want to see who he is following and he's following far too many people to find Hillary. You'd be looking for days. I would not join facebook. Steer clear of it. Once you join they keep you signed up even after you ask to be removed. There is way too many horror stories about facebook. I would not have anything to do with that site.

Twitter is alright. I had an account and then canceled it after too many people started following me (thousands). It felt overwhelming - like I was in a room with thousands of strangers watching every word I wrote. It felt creepy. My computer tech told me that was the idea - gain a lot of followers. I told him I don't like that idea - please get me out of there now!

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Even Michelle Obama is Ditching Hillary ...Oh wait it was just More Bull Shit Mountain stew

Hannity Tweets Apology for Sharing False Report on Michelle Obama Deleting Clinton Tweets
Source: Mediaite

Sean Hannity has recently started to indulge more in what one might call tabloid conspiracies, but today he did apologize after sharing one.

See, Hannity keeps up with the site The Gateway Pundit, and one of the posts up earlier today was titled “Rats Jump Ship=> Michelle Obama Did Scrubs Hillary Clinton from Twitter History?”

WOW WHAT A BOMBSHELL except for the fact that this didn’t happen.

What was the evidence of this? That @MichelleObama apparently hasn’t tweeted anything since early 2013. The only problem here is that the main Twitter account the FLOTUS uses is, well, @FLOTUS.

Read more: Hannity Tweets Apology for Sharing False Report on Michelle Obama Deleting Clinton Tweets

 

[tyroneweaver]

Obama fails to repeat the line that Comey is interfering in the election, Michelle Obama unfollows HRC on Twitter and deleted all her Tweets about her, Elizabeth Warren follows suit and unfollows HRC, Sanders Tweets are very vague and no endorsement of Clinton. This is just the tip of the ice berg as more and more dems abandon Clinton.

Dems are looking to regroup for 2020 and do everything they can for a failed Trump Presidency at this point. The exodus has begun and expect more fallout as WikiLeaks exposes more Clinton/DNC/Media corruption this week. The best is yet to come.

As a side note: There's a video of Chris Matthews in what appears to be him endorsing Trump but I have no context for it right now so I can't be certain of that one. Perhaps someone can clear that up, but it does appear that he flips on Clinton.

Comey told Obama to back off because it's going to get ugly. Why else would he not scream foul?

Where was this?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

a guy named "Doug" ditches Hillary
Oh Wait 28 percent of Republicans are "Puking on Trump"

28% republicans voted for Hillary - Twitter Search

 

[Lewdog]

Lord I can't wait for this election to be over.

 

[Mrs. M.]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

There is a breaking point with Trump as well.

There is a breaking point for everyone. The problem with Clinton is that she got away with so much for so long that people are offended and very angry. It's easier to take a city with bars on the gates than retake that kind of ground. She is in a no win situation. Hillary has plenty of money and two lovely grandchildren. She should resign, write a book or two and enjoy her family. No one ever said on their death bed, I wish I would had worked more, I wish I would have spent less time with my children and grandchildren. Bill doesn't want 4 more years in the White House. He's worn out. Look at him.

 

[g5000]

I just checked the entire month of October on Obama's Twitter account and there is nothing there about Hillary Clinton. Not one word. Not even on the 26th which was Hillary's birthday. I'm checking Michele's now.

Hey retard. Please read posts 30, 39, and post 61.

Idiot.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Lord I can't wait for this election to be over.

 

[Coyote]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

15-20% are independent.
THEY decide the election.
There's a breaking point with the Clintons.
America may have reached that limit.

There is a breaking point with Trump as well.

There is a breaking point for everyone. The problem with Clinton is that she got away with so much for so long that people are offended and very angry. It's easier to take a city with bars on the gates than retake that kind of ground. She is in a no win situation. Hillary has plenty of money and two lovely grandchildren. She should resign, write a book or two and enjoy her family. No one ever said on their death bed, I wish I would had worked more, I wish I would have spent less time with my children and grandchildren. Bill doesn't want 4 more years in the White House. He's worn out. Look at him.

Thing is - I could say the same about Trump. He's angered and offended many and he doesn't have the temperment for the office.

It just sucks that we have crap choices.

 

[Mrs. M.]

Lol you people are blowing this way out of proportion. This update has come too little too late. Hillary has her share of scandals, but Trump's far outweigh hers. It's hurt her poll numbers no doubt, but she will still win. Mitt Romney's polling average was lower than her at this point. Hillary will win.

She is on a downward spiral. Doug Shoen who has been with the Clinton's since 94' just announced he is no longer supporting Clinton and won't vote for her due to the FBI investigation being re-opened.

So she is in a downward spiral because some guy named Doug is ditching her?

Look, at this late in the game, people have already made up their minds about who they will vote for. There isn't very many undecided voters left. Some of them may have been turned off by this scandal, but that doesn't mean they will just jump over to Trump.

No. She isn't in a downward spiral over Doug Shoen. She is in a downward spiral over the news coming out this morning.
Wiles - a writer for American Thinker reported the following news:

Not only is the probe reopened, it has been upgraded and expanded. It has been upgraded from a preliminary inquiry to a formal criminal investigation with grand jury power. That also means that, at least at the level of the federal grand jury itself, assistant U.S. attorneys assigned to that grand jury are now for the first time formally involved.

Who is being investigated? Hillary Clinton. It's very serious. She's not going to survive this one.